Pedagogical Potential of the Philosophy of Atheistic Existentialism and Humanistic Psychoanalysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v26i2.1000Keywords:
philosophy of pedagogy, atheistic existentialism, religious existentialism, existential (humanistic) psychoanalysis, postmodernism, post-postmodernism, atheism, romanticismAbstract
The study assesses the relevance of developing the worldview of modern pedagogy and presents the main criteria that can be followed when choosing philosophical concepts and pedagogical teachings. The authors conduct an academic analysis of the current state of philosophy associated with the postmodern approach to equalizing subjectively significant aspects. Based on the analysis of philosophical works of the 20th century, they substantiate the French atheistic existentialism and existential (humanistic) psychoanalysis as philosophical concepts that form a productive worldview of modern people. It is concluded that atheistic existentialism and humanistic psychoanalysis are among the most important trends in philosophy, especially in the 20th century. The above-mentioned philosophical concepts can influence education by promoting a more holistic approach to teaching and learning that considers the intellectual, emotional, and ethical aspects of human experience. These perspectives can help educators create a learning environment that promotes personal growth, self-awareness, and critical thinking, as well as foster the development of more empathetic, responsible, and engaged citizens.
Downloads
References
Adams, M. V., & Clarke, S. (Eds.) (2016). Mirrors of the mind: Metaphorical narratives in adult learning. London: Routledge.
Berdyaev, N. (1993). O naznachenii cheloveka (On the mission of a person, in Russian). Moscow: Izd-vo Respublika.
Bogdanova, O. A. (2016). Krizis identichnosti lichnosti v kulture postmoderna (The crisis of personal identity in postmodern culture, in Russian). Nauchnaya mysl Kavkaza (Scientific Thought of the Caucasus, in Russian), 2, 26-31.
Bokov, G. E. (2015). Filosofskoe nasledie Fridrikha Nitsshe i teologiya ìsmerti Bogaî (The philosophical legacy of Friedrich Nietzsche and the theology of the ìDeath of Godî, in Russian). Filosofskii zhurnal (Philosophical Journal, in Russian), 8(1), 67-87.
Bultmann, R. (1992). Novyy Zavet i mifologiya. Problema demifologizatsii novozavetnogo provozvestiya (New testament and mythology: The problem of demythologizing the new testament proclamation, in Russian). Voprosy filosofii (Questions of Philosophy, in Russian), 11, 86-114.
Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays. New York: Knopf.
Camus, A. (1991). The rebel: An essay on man in revolt. New York: Vintage Books.
Dolin, V. A. (2013). Kontsept ìsmert subektaî v sovremennoi filosofii (The concept of ìdeath of the subjectî in modern philosophy, in Russian). Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Culture and Art History. Questions of Theory and Practice, in Russian), 4-2(30), 56-61.
Frankl, V. E. (1984). Manís search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Freud, S. (1961). The future of an illusion. New-York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Fromm, E. (1990). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Garin, I. (1992). Voskreshenie dukha (Spirit resurrection, in Russian). Moscow: Terra.
Heidegger, M. (2006). Nitsshe i pustota (Nietzsche and emptiness, in Russian). Moscow: Eksmo.
Heine, H. (1958). K istorii religii i filosofii v Germanii (On the history of religion and philosophy in Germany, in Russian). In N. Ya. Berkovsky, V. M. Zhirmunsky, & Ya. M. Metallov (Eds.), Sobraniye sochineniy: v 10 tomakh (The collection of works: In 10 volumes, in Russian) (Vol. 6, pp. 13-139). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel'stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury.
Jaspers, K. (1994). Nitsshe i khristianstvo (Nietzsche and Christianity, in Russian). Moscow: Medium.
Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Either/or: A fragment of life. Kjobenhavn: C.A. Reitzel.
Lipskii, E. B. (2012). Post-postmodern: Kontseptualizatsiya idei sovremennogo iskusstva (Post-postmodern: Conceptualizing the idea of contemporary art, in Russian). Vestnik SPbGU. Filosofiya, kulturologiya, politologiya, pravo (Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Philosophy, Culturology, Political Science, Law, in Russian), 6(2), 42-48.
Locke, J. (1693). Some thoughts concerning education. London: Printed for Awnsham and John Churchill, at the Black Swan in Pater-noster-Row. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00016977
Loifman, I. Y. (2002). Mirovozzrencheskiye shtudii: Izbrannyye raboty (Worldview studies: Selected works, in Russian). Yekaterinburg: Bank of Cultural Information.
Marcel, G. (2007). Prisutstviye i bessmertiye: izbrannyye raboty (Presence and immortality: Selected works, in Russian). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Theology, and History of St. Thomas.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Some educational implications of the humanistic psychologies. Harvard Educational Review, 38(4), 685-696. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.38.4.j07288786v86w660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.38.4.j07288786v86w660
Maslow, A. H. (1998). Toward a psychology of being. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
Mounier, E. (1995). Nadezhda otchayavshikhsya: Mal'ro. Kamyu. Sartr. Bernanos: Ocherki (The hope of the despairing: Malraux, Camus, Sartre, Bernanos: Essays, in Russian). Moscow: Iskusstvo.
Mounier, E. (1999). Manifest personalizma (Personalism manifesto, in Russian). Moscow: Respublika.
Mozheiko, M. A. (2012). Ot postmoderna k post-postmodernu: Sovremennye sotsiokulturnye transformatsii i noveishie tendentsii v filosofii yazyka (From postmodern to post-postmodern: modern sociocultural transformations and the latest trends in the philosophy of language, in Russian). Journal of Art and Language, 1(1), 71-86. doi: 10.7816/idil-01-01-05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7816/idil-01-01-05
Richard, H. L. (2014). Religious syncretism as a syncretistic concept: The inadequacy of the ìWorld religionsî paradigm in cross-cultural encounter. International Journal of Frontier Missiology, 31(4), 209-215.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). Emile ou, De l'education (Emile, or on education, in French). Paris: Defer de Maisonneuve.
Rozin, V. M. (2007). Filosofiya obrazovaniya: Etyudy-issledovaniya (Philosophy of education: Etudes and studies, in Russian). Moscow: Izd-vo MPSI.
Sartre, J.-P. (2001). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. London: Routledge.
Schneider, K. J., Pierson, J. F., & Bugental, J. F. T. (Eds.) (2015). The handbook of humanistic psychology: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387864
Schwieler, E. (Ed.) (2017). The return of practice in higher education: New directions in teaching philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shchittsova, T. V. (2006). Ekzistentsialnaya terapiya, ili kak praktikuyut filosofiyu (k aktualnosti Kirkegora v sovremennuyu epokhu) (Existential therapy, or how philosophy is done (on the relevance of Kierkegaard in the modern era), in Russian). Logos, 6, 84-99.
Skoropanova, I. S. (2000). Russkaya postmodernistskya literature (The Russian postmodern literature, in Russian). Studentís textbook. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.
Yudin, K. A. (2017). Epistemologicheskaya kritika falsifikatsii nauchnogo ateizma, ili Metamorfozy ìreligioznogo renessansaî vsovremennoi Rossii (The epistemological criticism of the falsifications of scientific atheism, or the metamorphoses of the ìReligious Renaissanceî in modern Russia, in Russian). Vestnik SPbGU. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya (Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Philosophy and Conflictology, in Russian), 33(1), 85-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.109
Znakov, V. V. (2016). Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka (Psychology of understanding the human world, in Russian). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Natalia SHAFAZHINSKAYA, Natalia BONDARENKO , Irina POLOZHENTSEVA , Irma MOLCHANOVA , Vladimir KOZLOV , Alexey ALESHKOV , Said-Umar VOZKAEV
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.