The Philosophy of the Concept “Privacy” in English and Chinese Linguoculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1017Keywords:
privacy, concept, linguophilosophy, intimacy, freedom, property, personalityAbstract
The current article is devoted to the study of the linguophilosophical concept “Privacy” in English and Chinese linguocultures, which plays a vital role in the formation of the meaning of life for any individual and the major axiological functions of personality.
The aim of the study is to give a complete characteristic of the philosophical concept “Privacy” in English linguocultures.
The novelty of this work is determined by representing the construction of the model of as a linguocultural concept, as well as defining its socio-psychological, cultural, philosophical and linguistic characteristics. This study is also important in identifying the ways of expressing “Privacy” in the lexical-phraseological system of language and communicative behavior.
The material for the study is presented by linguistic units, found in dictionaries, reference books and popular literature.
Downloads
References
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
James, H. (2009). The Bostonians. Oxford Worldís Classics: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199539147.003.0010
Karasik, V. I. (2001). O kotegoriyakh lingvokulíturologii (On Linguistic Cultural Genetics, in Russian). In Yazykovaya lichností; Kulíturnye kontsepty (Linguistic Personality; Cultural concept, in Russian) (pp. 3-16). Volgograd, Arkhangelsk.
Magnusson, L. (1999). Shakespeare and social dialogue: Dramatic language and elizabethan letters. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483745
Murdoch, I. (1984). The sacred and profane love machine. London: Penguins Book
Murdoch, I. (2001). The bell. London: Penguin Books.
Privacy (2018). In Standford encylopedia of philosophy. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/privacy/
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Terpstra, R. H., & Holt, D. H. (1995, April). Pre-post tiananmen square; Changing values of chinese managers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 12(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733968
Salinger, J. D. (2001). Franny and Zooey. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
Schafer, A. (2011). Privacy: A philosophical overview. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from https://umanitoba.ca/faculties/arts/departments/philosophy/ethics/media/privacy_-_a_philosophical_overview.pdf
Schoeman, F. (1992). Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solove, J. D. (2006). A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(3), 477-564. https://doi.org/10.2307/40041279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40041279
Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Wong, Y. T. E. (2001). The Chinese at work: Collectivism or individualism? (HKIBS Working Paper Series 040-001). Retrieved April 20, 2023, from http://commons.ln.edu.hk/hkibswp/31
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gevorg Grigoryan, Ning Huichun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
