The Philosophy of the Concept “Privacy” in English and Chinese Linguoculture


  • Jingjing SHI Institue of International Communication, Taizhou Vocational And Technical College, Zhejiang Province, China; Universiti Teknologi Mara (UITM), Selangor, Malaysia
  • Gevorg GRIGORYAN PhD
  • Huichun NING Jiangxi Tellhow Animation Vocational College



privacy, concept, linguophilosophy, intimacy, freedom, property, personality


The current article is devoted to the study of the linguophilosophical concept “Privacy” in English and Chinese linguocultures, which plays a vital role in the formation of the meaning of life for any individual and the major axiological functions of personality.

The aim of the study is to give a complete characteristic of the philosophical concept “Privacy” in English linguocultures.

The novelty of this work is determined by representing the construction of the model of as a linguocultural concept, as well as defining its socio-psychological, cultural, philosophical and linguistic characteristics. This study is also important in identifying the ways of expressing “Privacy” in the lexical-phraseological system of language and communicative behavior.

The material for the study is presented by linguistic units, found in dictionaries, reference books and popular literature.


Download data is not yet available.


Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). DOI:

James, H. (2009). The Bostonians. Oxford Worldís Classics: Oxford University Press. DOI:

Karasik, V. I. (2001). O kotegoriyakh lingvokulíturologii (On Linguistic Cultural Genetics, in Russian). In Yazykovaya lichností; Kulíturnye kontsepty (Linguistic Personality; Cultural concept, in Russian) (pp. 3-16). Volgograd, Arkhangelsk.

Magnusson, L. (1999). Shakespeare and social dialogue: Dramatic language and elizabethan letters. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Murdoch, I. (1984). The sacred and profane love machine. London: Penguins Book

Murdoch, I. (2001). The bell. London: Penguin Books.

Privacy (2018). In Standford encylopedia of philosophy. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Terpstra, R. H., & Holt, D. H. (1995, April). Pre-post tiananmen square; Changing values of chinese managers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 12(1), 1-20. DOI:

Salinger, J. D. (2001). Franny and Zooey. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

Schafer, A. (2011). Privacy: A philosophical overview. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from

Schoeman, F. (1992). Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Solove, J. D. (2006). A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(3), 477-564. DOI:

Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.

Wong, Y. T. E. (2001). The Chinese at work: Collectivism or individualism? (HKIBS Working Paper Series 040-001). Retrieved April 20, 2023, from




How to Cite

SHI, J., GRIGORYAN, G., & NING, H. (2023). The Philosophy of the Concept “Privacy” in English and Chinese Linguoculture. WISDOM, 28(4), 80–88.



Philosophy of Language