Philosophical and Theoretical Aspects of Court-Notary Interaction: Current Relationships in the Provision of Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1038Keywords:
competence of the court, justice, notary, providing evidence, notarial procedureAbstract
The article examines the modern relationship between the interaction of the court and the notary when taking measures to ensure evidence. In particular, it is indicated that when providing evidence, these bodies are guided by the norms of civil procedural legislation and implement similar goals aimed at fixing factual circumstances of legal significance in a procedural form. It is emphasized that their competence touches, moreover, the notary, as it were, replaces the court in the implementation of interim measures. One of the tasks of the effective activity of the notary is to relieve the judicial system from the consideration of local and time-consuming issues, which are solved, as a rule, without the application of the principle of adversarial parties, including the provision of evidence on the Internet. Thus, the potential of unloading the court is excluded from its competence to solve problems that do not relate to the administration of justice.
Downloads
References
APK Rossijskoj Federacii (The APC of the Russian Federation, in Russian) (2002, July 29). Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, in Russian), No. 30, Article 3012.
Begichev, A. V. (2015). Sushchnost' pravozashchitnoj deyatel'nosti notariata v sisteme social'noj funkcii gosudarstva (The essence of the notaryís human rights activity in the system of the social function of the state, in Russian). Notariat (Notary, in Russian), 5, 26-29.
Degtyarev, S. L. (2006). Vzaimootnosheniya sudebnoj vlasti s organami notariata (The relationship of the judiciary with the bodies of the notary, in Russian). Notariat (Notary, in Russian), 5, 12.
Frolova, E. E., & Rusakova, E. P. (2022). Razvitie cifrovyh tekhnologij dlya razresheniya sporov hozyajstvuyushchih sub"ektov kak sredstvo povysheniya ekonomicheskoj stabil'nosti (Development of digital technologies for dispute resolution of economic entities as a means of increasing economic stability, in Russian). Dostizheniya v oblasti issledovanij rossijskogo biznesa i menedzhmenta (Advances in Research on Russian Business and Management, in Russian), 2022, 65-73.
GPK Rossijskoj Federacii (The CPC of the Russian Federation, in Russian) (2002, November 18). Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, in Russian), No. 46, Article 4532.
Kleandrov, M. I. (2022). Spravedlivost' i pravosudie: monografiya (Justice and justice: Monograph, in Russian). Moscow: Publishing House NORM: Infra-M.
Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii (The Constitution of the Russian Federation, in Russian) (1993, December 25). Rossiyskaya Gazeta (Russian newspaper, in Russian), No. 237.
Mikhailova, E. V. (2022). Sud i notariat: perspektivy ontologicheskogo edinstva (Court and notary: Prospects of ontological unity, in Russian). Gosudarstvo i pravo (State and Law, in Russian), 12, 38-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520023348-3
Mizintsev, E. N. (2012). O sootnoshenii notarial'noj i sudebnoj deyatel'nosti (On the relationship of notarial and judicial activities, in Russian). Rossijskij sud'ya (Russian Judge, in Russian), 4.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii (The Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 57, in Russian) (2017, 26 December). Retrived May 20, 2023, from www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_286321/?ysclid=lm7nrw1s6o966834444
Prikaz Ministerstva yusticii Rossijskoj Federacii (The Order of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation No. 156, in Russian) (2017, August 30). Retrived May 20, 2023, from www.pravo.gov.ru
Puchinsky, V. K. (2022). Iz tvorcheskogo naslediya: Sbornik trudov (From the creative heritage: A collection of works, in Russian). Moscow: Gorodets.
Reshenie Suda po intellektual'nym pravam (The Intellectual Property Rights Court Ruling. No. C01-244/2017 in case No. A43-4569/2016, in Russian) (2017, 29 March). Retrived May 20, 2023, from www.base.garant.ru/71645232/?ysclid=lm7kssccrv199045559
Rozhkova, M. A., Glazkova, M. E., & Savina, M. A. (2015). Aktual'nye problemy unifikacii grazhdanskogo processual'nogo i arbitrazhnogo processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: monografiya (Actual problems of unification of civil procedural and arbitration procedural legislation: Monograph, in Russian). (M. A. Rozhkova, Ed.). Moscow: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation.
Svedeníya o notariate v Rossiiskoi federacii za 2022 god (Information about the notary of the Russian Federation for 2022, in Russian) (2022). Retrived May 20, 2023, from https://minjust.gov.ru/ru/pages/svedeniya-o-notariate-v-rossijskoj-federacii-za-2022-god/
?snovy zakonodatel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii o notariate (The Fundamentals of the Legislation of the Russian Federation on the Notary, in Russian) (1993, March 11). Vedomosti S"ezda narodnyh deputatov Rossijskoj Federacii i Verhovnogo Soveta Rossijskoj Federacii (Vedomosti of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation, in Russian), No. 10, Article 357.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander BEGICHEV, Evgenia FROLOVA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
