Political and Philosophical Analysis of the Interpenetration of Public-Law And Private-Law Spheres of Regulation in the Activities of the Eurasian Economic Union


  • Maryia MIASHCHANAVA Law Institute, Peoples‟ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); Law Faculty, Belarusian State University (BSU University); National Centre of Legislation and Legal Research of the Republic of Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8895-851X
  • Evgenia FROLOVA Law Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); Law School, Far Eastern Federal University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1852-0085




common (single) market, customs union, freedom of establishment, freedom to provide services, private law, public law, competing federalism, free market access


The research objective of this article is to analyse the interpenetration of private law and public law regulation carried out within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union. It is noted that in the sphere of private law, the EAEU has virtually no powers to unify / harmonise the national legislation of member states, but achieving the goals of building a common (single) market is often impossible without the elimination of private law barriers. This phenomenon is discussed using the example of restrictions on the freedom of establishment (in terms of opening branches of foreign organisations) and digitalisation of public procurement within the EAEU. It is argued that the phenomenon of “privatisation” of state functions, characteristic of the period of so-called globalisation, cannot be a distinctive feature of a multipolar world order. It seems more correct to speak of a close interrelation and interpenetration of private and public legal regulation of social relations.


Download data is not yet available.


Barnard,†C. (2007). The substantive law of the EU. The four freedoms. (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Barriers in States. Portal of general information resources and open data of the EAEU (n.d.). Retrieved September 5, 2023, from https://barriers.eaeunion.org/en-us/Pages/obstacle-barriers.aspx

Basedow, J. (2016). Pravo otkrytyh obshchestv ñ chastnoe i gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij: obshchij kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava (The Law of Open Societies†ñ Private Ordering and Public Regulation of International Relations: General Course on Private International Law, in Russian). Moscow: Norma.

Bertalanffy,†L.†V. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, I(2), 134-165.

Blauberg,†I.†V. (1997). Problema celostnosti i sistemnyj podhod (The problem of integrity and systems approach, in Russian). Moscow: Editorial URSS.

Charny,†D. (1991). Competition among jurisdictions in formulating corporate law rules: An American perspective on the ìRace to the Bottomî in the european communities. Harvard International Law Journal, 32, 422-428.

European Court Reports 197900649. Case 120/78. Cassis de Dijon. ECLI:EU:C:1979:42. Retrieved September 5, 2023, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61978CJ0120&qid=1682435472438

European Court Reports 1995 I-04165. Case C-55/94. Gebhard v. Consiglio dellíOrdine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano. ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1995:411. Retrieved September 5, 2023, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61994CJ0055&qid=1682436232811

Inshakova,†A.†O., Frolova, E.†E., Rusakova, E.†P., & Kovalev, S.†I. (2020). The model of distribution of human and machine labor at intellectual production in industry 4.0. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 601-622.

Miashchanava,†M.†V. (2010). Pravovoe regulirovanie vnutrennego rynka Evropejskogo Soyuza: ucheb. posobie (Legal regulation of the internal market of the European Union: Textbook, in Russian). (H.†Herrmann, S.†A.†Balashenko, T.†Borich, Eds.). Minsk: Zorny Verasok.

Miashchanava,†M.†V. (2017). Sistemností v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave : monografiya (Consistency in private international law: Monograph, in Russian). Minsk: Chetyre chetverti.

Mills, A. (2023). The privatisation of private (and) international law. Current Legal Problems, XX, 1-54.

Semyakin,†M.†N. (2014). Chastnoe pravo: filosofskie i istoricheskie osnovaniya i problemy sovremennoj civilisticheskoj doktriny: monografiya (Private Law: philosophical and historical foundations and problems of modern civil doctrine: Monograph, in Russian). Moscow: Yurlitinform.

Semyakin,†M.†N. (2016). Problemy sovremennogo ponimaniya metodologii civilisticheskogo pravovedeniya (Problems of modern understanding of the methodology of Civil Law, in Russian).In Chastnoe pravo. Preodolevaya ispytaniya: K 60-letiyu B.†M.†Gongalo (Private Law. Overcoming trials: To the 60th anniversary of B.†M.†Gongalo, in Russian) (pp. 111-119). Moscow: Statut.

Shershenevich,†G.†F. (1995). Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava (po izdaniyu 1907 g.) (Textbook of Russian civil law (According to the edition of 1907), in Russian). Moscow: Spark.

The World Bank. Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) (n.d.). (Figures in current US$). Retrieved September 5, 2023, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD

Tiebout,†C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-435.




How to Cite

MIASHCHANAVA, M., & FROLOVA, E. (2023). Political and Philosophical Analysis of the Interpenetration of Public-Law And Private-Law Spheres of Regulation in the Activities of the Eurasian Economic Union. WISDOM, 28(4), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1073



Philosophy of Law