Integration Political and Legal Analysis of Dispute Resolution and Prospects for Digitalization of Justice in the Eurasian Economic Union

Authors

  • Tatsiana MIKHALIOVA Faculty of International Relations, Belarusian State University; Law Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-7624
  • Gregory VASILEVICH Law Faculty, Belarusian State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1089

Keywords:

administration of justice, arbitration, Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, digitalization, dispute settlement, Eurasian Economic Union, mediation, ODR, integration policy, regional integration

Abstract

The article refers to a system of dispute resolution in the Eurasian Economic Union, tendencies of its reforming and prospects for digitalization as a fundamental feature of regional integration policy improvement. A complex variety of disputes in an integration association is considered: interstate, supranational vertical, supranational horizontal, and cross-border. The appropriate mechanisms for each of them and rationale to enhance integration are discussed. The authors suggest amendments for enhancing the cooperation of the EAEU Court with national courts, as well as evolving other mechanisms (arbitration and mediation). Digitalization of justice is an important element of effective regional policy. Digitization elements, including the Court’s e-cabinets for the parties, electronic signature, digital documents’ circulation, make regional justice accessible, it contributes to peoples’ loyalty for integration decisions. The article proves the necessity to harmonize approaches to online dispute settlement in a transboundary context in the EAEU; the authors draw attention to low-cost cross-border disputes in this context and consider an opportunity of creating online dispute resolution platform driven by the Commission. Improvements in regional system of dispute resolution are proved necessary to sustain integration economic and political processes in Eurasia, to promote transparency, accessibility of justice as an element of regional integration policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alekseev, G. V., & Gapeev, A. A. (2019). Integratsionnoye pravosudiye: Juzhnoaerikanskiy opyt (Integrational justice: South Americaís experience, in Russian). Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 2, 41-48.

Begichev, A. V. (2022). Rolí tsifrovizatsii vo vzaimodejstvi sudebnyh i notarialnyh organov v primenenii primiritelnyh protsedur (The role of digitalization on the interaction of judicial and notarial authorities in conciliation, in Russian). RUDN Journal o Law, 26(2), 485-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2022-26-2-485-500

Chernyshov, A. G. (2018). Strategija i filosofija tsifrovizatsii (Strategy and philosophy of digitalization, in Russian). Power, 26(5), 13-21.

Diyachenko,†E., & Entin,†K. (2017). Kompetentsiya Suda Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: mify i realíností (Competence of the Eurasian Economic Union Court: Myths and realities, in Russian).†Mezhdunarodnoe Pravosudie (), 3, 76-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21128/2226-2059-2017-3-76-95

Donskaya, D. S. (2021). Uslovija dopustimosti predvaritelnyh soglashenij ob onlain arbitrazhe transgranichnyh potrebitelskih sporov v amerikanskoj I evropejskoj praktike (Conditions of an access of preliminary agreements on online arbitrage trounsboundary consumer dicputes in American and European practice, in Russian). Vestnik Universiteta im? Kutafina (Bulletin of Rutafin University, in Russian), 3(79), 235-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.79.3.235-242

Drabo, F. (2021). The Digitazation of Court Processes in African Regional and Subregional Judicial Institutions. PhD dissertation, Walden University. Retrieved May 20, 2023 from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11691&context=dissertations

Emerging Technologies and Judicial Integrity in ASEAN: Judicial Integrity Network ASEAN. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2022-03/UNDP-RBAP-Emerging-Technologies-and-Judicial-Integrity-in-ASEAN-2021.pdf

Frolova, E. E., & Ermakova, E. P. (2022). Using artificial intelligence in dispute resolution. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 254, 131-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_11

Haas, E. (1958/2004). The Uniting Europe: Political, social and economic forces 1950-1957. Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press.

Inshakova, A. O., & Goncharov, A. I. (2023). Mezhgosudarstvennoje regulirovaniye primenenija tsifrovykh tekhnologij industrii 4.0 v EAES i BRICS (Interstate regulation of application of digital technologies in Industri 4.0 in the EAEU and the BRICS, in Russian). Law and Administration, XXI Century, 1(66), 15-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2023-1-66-15-22

Iskakov, I.†Zh. (2014). Politicheskie protsessy i politicheskij landshaft sovremennoj Evrazii: evrazijskaja integratsija (Political processes and political landscape of modern Eurasia: Eurasian integration, in Russian). Izvestija AltGU, 4, 273-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2014)4.2-40

Ispolinov, A. S., & Kadysheva, O. V. (2016). Praktika promenenija dosudebnogo poriadka rassmotrenija sporov v sudah evrazijskoj integratsii (Practice of application of the pretrial consiferation of disputes in the courts of Eurasian integration, in Russian). Law, 10, 120-126.

Kleandrov, M.†I. (2000). Kakie mezhdunarodnyje sudy nuzhny dlia SNG? (What international courts are necessary for the CIS?, in Russian). Moscow Journal of International Law, 4, 21-34.

Kurbanov, R. A., & Naletov, K. I. (2018). Pravovyje aspekty obespechenija konkurentosposobnosti rissijskoj ekonomiki s ispolzovaniem preimuschestv evrazijskoj integratsii (Legal aspects of support of the competitiveness of the Russian economy with the use of the advantages of the Eurasian integration, in Russian). Economy. Law. Society, 2, 10-14.

Lagiewska, M. (2023). The new landscape of arbitration in view of digitalization. In S.Lalani, & S.G. Shapiro (Eds.), The Impact of Covid on International Disputes (pp. 208-217). Brill: Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514836_013

Mikhaliova, T. (2022). Ugrading legal regulation in the context of digital economy : The Eurasian Economic Union agenda. In A. O. Inshkova, & E. E.Frolova (Eds.), Smart Technologies for the Digitalisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment (pp. 213-226). Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_18

Mikhaliova, T. N. (2023). Rolí aktov Suda EAES v razvitii evrazijskogo prava (The role of the judicial acts in the development of the Eurasian Law, in Russian). In Regulirovanije pravootnoshenij v sfere publichnogo upravlenija: voprosy teorii i praktiki (k 25-letiju Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta prvosudija, sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, 21 aprelia 2023) (Regulation of legal relations in the sphere of public administration: issues of theory and practice (to the 25th anniversary of the Russian State University of Justice, collected writings of the International scientific conference, 21 April 2023), in Russian) (pp. 14-18). Saint Petesburg: Asterion.

Peters, S. (2021). The evolution of alternative dispute resolution and online dispute resolution and online dispute resolution in the European Union. Revista CES Derecho, 12 (1), 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21615/cesder.12.1.1

Pisarevskiy, D. Yu. (2018). Razvitie prava stran EAES v oblasti mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha (MKA) kak mera obespechenija ekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti uchastnikov kommercheskogo oborota stran EAES (Development of the law of the EAEU member-states in the field of international commercial arbitration (ICA), in Russian). International cooperation of Eurasian States: Politics, Economy, Law, 2, 16-26.

Rusakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Digital disputes in the new legal reality. RUDN Journal of Law, 26(3), 695-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2022-26-3-695-704

Shinkaretskaya, G. G., & Berman, A. M. (2019). Tsifrovizatsia kak instrument razvitija regionalnyh integratsionnyh objedinenij (Digitalization as an instrument for development of the integration associations, in Russian). Education and Law, 7, 262-269.

Stepanov, O. A., Pechegin, D. A., & Diakonova, M. O. (2021). K voprosu o tsifrovizatsii sudebnoy deyatel'nosti (Towards the Issue of Digitalization of Judicial Activities, in Russian). Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki (Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, in Russian), 5, 4-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2021.5.4.23

Vasilevich, G. A. (2020). Rolí sudebnoy vlasti v uslovijah evrazijskoy integratsii (The role of the judiciary in the context of the Eurasian economic integration, in Russian). In Piatí let Dogovoru o Evrazijskov ekonomicheskom sojuze: rolí Suda: Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsija, 19-20 sentiabria 2019 (Fifth Anniversary of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union: the Role of the Court: International Conference, 19-20 September 2019, in Russian) (pp. 176-181). Minsk: Sud EAES

Vinogradova, E. V., & Oganezova, A. V. (2020). Alíternativnoje razreshenije sporov v stranah Evrazijskogo ekonomicheskogo sojuza: mediacija (Alternative dispute resolution in the countries of the Eurasian economic union: mediation, in Russian). Eurasian Advocacy, 1(44), 51-56.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

MIKHALIOVA, T., & VASILEVICH, G. (2023). Integration Political and Legal Analysis of Dispute Resolution and Prospects for Digitalization of Justice in the Eurasian Economic Union. WISDOM, 28(4), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1089

Issue

Section

Philosophy of Law