The Political Impact of Digitalization on the Judicial Method of Protection of Rights in the EAEU Countries

Authors

  • Ekaterina RUSAKOVA Law Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-0754

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1090

Keywords:

e-court, e-litigation, e-CELL, e-mediation, legislation, Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Belorussia

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the process of digital transformation of the judicial method of protecting rights and legitimate interests in the EAEU countries. The judicial form of protection of rights has undergone fundamental changes as one of the main forms of protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and business entities through the creation of digital platforms, electronic courts and the integration of information and telecommunication technologies into the process of consideration and resolution of disputes. For effective legal regulation of public relations arising under the influence of digital technologies in the course of judicial proceedings, it is necessary to theoretically develop the concept of a new type – “electronic” civil proceedings and improve the current legislation. In world practice, there are already a number of countries and integration associations that have successfully integrated digital and electronic legal proceedings, so some EAEU countries have taken the path of borrowing their positive experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bashilov, B.†I., & Berman, A.†M. (2022). Procedural documents in the era of new technologies: How legal design has changed the legal world. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 288, 261-270. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8_28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8_28

Burdina, E.†V. (2021). Novyye organizatsionnyye formy otpravleniya pravosudiya: opyt sudov Respubliki Kazakhstan (New organizational forms of administration of justice: Experience of courts in the Republic of Kazakhstan, in Russian). Rossiyskiy sud'ya (Russian judge, in Russian), 1, 49-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2021-1-49-53

Fedotov, O.†O. (2012). Elektronnoye pravosudiye v Respublike Belarus' (Electronic justice in the Republic of Belarus, in Russian). Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://busy-lawyer.livejournal.com/779.html

Frolova, E. E., & Rusakova, E. P. (2021). Trends in the development of alternative ways of dispute resolution of neo industrialization subjects. In E.G. Popkova, & B. S. Sergi (Eds.), Modern global economic system: Evolutional development vs. revolutionary leap. ISC 2019. Lecture notes in networks and systems (vol. 198, pp. 1842-1849). Springer: Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_203

Frolova, E.†E. (2020). Novaya ekosistema finansovogo yevropeyskogo rynka Soyuza: tsifrovizatsiya i ustoychivost' (The new European Union financial market ecosystem: Digitalization and sustainability, in Russian). RUDN Journal of Law, 24(3), 673-694. doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2020- 24-3-673-694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-3-673-694

Gronic, I. A. (2022). On some aspects of case management in electronic courts of Indonesia. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 288, 193-199. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8_21

Guryeva, E. A. (2022). Informatsionno-pravovyye osnovy perekhoda k elektronnomu pravosudiyu (Information and legal foundations of the transition to electronic justice, in Russian). In Teoretiko-prikladnyye perspektivy pravovogo obespecheniya razvitiya ekonomiki: materialy mezhdunar. kruglogo stola (Theoretical and applied prospects of legal support of economic development: Materials of the international round table, in Russian), Minsk, October 21, 2022, (pp. 91-97). Minsk: Belarusian State University.

Hakobjanyan, A. V. (2022). Prospects for the development of electronic justice in the Republic of Armenia. Region i mir (Region and the World, in Russian), 26, 31-35.

Kosarenko, N.†N. (2023). Filosofsko-pravovoye ponimaniye iskusstvennogo intellekta. Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata (Philosophical and legal understanding of artificial intelligence, in Russian). Uchenyye trudy Rossiyskoy akademii advokatury i notariata (Scientific works of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notariat, in Russian), 1(68), 39-43.

Kozhokar, I. P., & Rusakova, E. P. (2023). Pravorealizatsionnaya yuridicheskaya tekhnika i tsifrovoe pravosudie (Law-implementing legal engineering and digital justice, in Russian). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki (Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, in Russian), 1(59), 121-141. doi: 10.17072/1995-4190- 2023-59-121-141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2023-59-121-141

Kudryavtseva, E.†V. (2021). Vzglyad iz proshlogo i nastoyashchego v budushcheye graficheskogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva (A look from the past and present into the future of the development of event legislation, in Russian). Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika (Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, in Russian), 9, 10-13.

Kukeev, A. K. (2021). Konstitutsionno-pravovyye osnovy organizatsii sudoproizvodstva v Respublike Kazakhstan (Constitutional and legal foundations of the organization of electronic legal proceedingsin the Republic of Kazakhstan, in Russian). In Tekhnologii XXI veka v yurisprudentsii : Materialy Tret'yey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Technologies of the XXI century in jurisprudence : Materials of the Third International Scientific and Practical Conference, Yekaterinburg, May 21, 2021, in Russian) (pp. 261-271). (D. V. Bakhteev, Ed.). Yekaterinburg: Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education ìUral State Law Universityî.

Kuznetsova, O.†A. (2022). Forms of protection of civil rights: The need for a new approach. The penitentiary system and society: Interaction experience: Collection of materials of the IX International scientific and practical conference, Perm, April 06ñ08, 2022. (Vol. 1, pp. 224-227) Perm: Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service.

Leshkevich, M. N. (n.d.). Aktual'nyye voprosy razvitiya elektronnogo sudoproizvodstva v Respubliki Belarus' (Topical issues of the development of electronic legal proceedings in the Republic of Belarus, in Russian). Retrieved August 10, 2023, from http://edoc.bseu.by:8080/bitstream/edoc/96380/3/Leshkevich_76_81.pdf

Miashchanava, M. V. (2022). International cooperation in the field of economic and legal regulation of end-to-end Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 254, 79-91. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_7

Rusakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Current problems of digital justice in the BRICS countries. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 254, 143-153. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_12

Semenov, N. S. (2022). Pravovyye problemy informatsionnykh informatsionnykh otnosheniy v elektronnom pravosudii Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki (Legal problems of establishing information relations in electronic justice of the Kyrgyz Republic, in Russian). Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiyskogo Slavyanskogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University, in Russian), 22(3), 104-110. doi: 10.36979/1694-500X-2022-22-3-104-110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36979/1694-500X-2022-22-3-104-110

Stepanov, O. V. (2018). Teoretiko-prikladnyye problemy razvitiya sudoproizvodstva v belorusskom grazhdanskom protsesse (Theoretical and applied problems of the development of electronic legal proceedings in the Belarusian civil process, in Russian). Aktual'nyye problemy gumanitarnykh i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh nauk (Actual problems of humanities and socioñeconomic sciences, in Russian), 12(5), 122-126.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

RUSAKOVA, E. (2023). The Political Impact of Digitalization on the Judicial Method of Protection of Rights in the EAEU Countries. WISDOM, 28(4), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1090

Issue

Section

Philosophy of Law

Most read articles by the same author(s)