Complex Regional Unification of Private International Law Rules on the Base of a Three-Part Structure: Political and Legal Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1091Keywords:
regional unification, complex unification, three-part structure, private international law, international civil procedure, conflict of laws rulesAbstract
This article examines the theoretical and legal framework of a complex regional unification of private international law rules on the basis of a three-part structure. The authors analyzed reasons for spread of trends to regional unification of private international law. Special attention in the article is given to the definition of the content and essence of a complex regional unification. The authors define acts of complex unification as acts structured according to the principle of a consistent response to the questions of applicable law, jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions in the regulated area. The article identifies the key advantages and disadvantages of a complex unification of private international law based on a three-part structure. The authors conclude that, to date, the adoption of acts of complex unification based on the three-part structure is one of the key trends in the unification of private international law.
Downloads
References
Block-Lieb, S., & Halliday, C. T. (2015). Less is more in international private law. Nottingham Insolvency & Business Law e-Journal, 3, 43-58.
Burman, H. (2008). Private international law. International Legal Developments in Review, 43(2), 741-757.
Ermakova, E. P., Frolova, E. E., & Sitkareva, E. V. (2021). International economic integration and the evolution of the principles of civil procedure. Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap. Institute of Scientific Communications Conference, 1589-1597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_175
Frolova, E. E., & Tsepova, E. A. (2021). Controlled foreign companies of russian residents in the context of world trends. RUDN Journal of Law, 25(4), 814-830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-4-814-830
Inshakova, A. O., Frolova, E. E., Rusakova, E. P., & Galkina, M. V. (2020). Development of social market economy under the influence of noneconomic factors: Modeling and regulation. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40, 239-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2020-0067
Loon, J. H. A. van. (2008). Remarks on the needs and methods for governance in the field of private international law ñ at the global and the regional levels. Making European Private Law ñ Governance Design, 197-200.
Oppong, R. F. (2006). Private international law and the African economic community: A plea for greater attention. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(4), 911-928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei134
Wilets, D. J. (2010). A unified theory of international law, the state, and the individual: transnational legal harmonization in the context of economic and legal globalization. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 31, 753-825.
Yiannopoulos, A. N. (1961). Conflict of laws and unification of law by international convention: The experience of the brussels convention of 1924. Louisiana Law Review, 21(3), 553-585.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alisa BERMAN, Nikita ERSHOV
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
