Bidirectional Interaction: Prerequisite Knowledge and Quantum Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v10i1.202Keywords:
premise knowledge, quantum mechanics, scientific dynamics, bidirectional InteractionAbstract
The generation of any kind of theory cannot be separated from its specific social background, and it will certainly be marked by the era. Social factors restrict the existence and development of scientific theory and these factors do not directly affect scientific theory. Their influence on the production and development of scientific theory is realized through the intermediary of prerequisite knowledge. This paper aims to analyze the two-way interaction between knowledge of premises and quantum theory in the process of development of quantum theory from “classical” to “semi-classical” to “Non-Classical”. Therefore, it points out how to break the shackles of the original “premise knowledge” in a timely and conscious manner, and how to construct its exploration of scientific work with the most appropriate background knowledge.
Downloads
References
Guy, P. (2005). Weimar Culture: a Short and Bright Cultural Legend. (L. Senyao Trans.). Hefei: Anhui Education Press.
Heisenberg, W. (1985). Development and Society of Atomic Physics. China Social Sciences Press.
Kraft, P., & Krose, P. (1984). Adaption of Scientific Knowledge to an Intellectual Environment. Paul Forman's 'Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918-1927'. Analysis and Criticism. Centaurus, 27(1), 76-99.
Kuhn, Th. S. (2003). The Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Maxwell, J. C. (1855). On Faraday’s Lines of Force. In W. Niven (Ed.), The Scientific Papers of Jame Clerk Maxwell (pp. 155-229). Paris: Librairie Scientifique J. Hermann.
Mutian, S. (1996). Outline of the Third Kind of Knowledge. Dialectics of Nature Communication, No. 1.
Mutian, S. (2007). On the Two Convergence of Scientific Dynamics - a Comparison between Western and Russian (Soviet) Philosophy of Science. Dialectics of Nature Communication.
Pinson, K. S. (1987). Modern German History: Its History and Culture (Vol. II). (V. Deryi, Trans.) Beijing: Comercial Press.
Stepin, V. S. (1987). Nauchnye revolyutsii kak «tochki» bifurkatsii v razvitii znaniya (Scientific Revolutions as “Points” of Bifurcation in the Development of Knowledge). In V. S. Stepin (Ed.), Nauchnye revolyutsii v dinamike kul'tury (Scientific Revolutions in the Dynamics of Culture, in Russian). Minsk.
Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.