A Comparative Study of Political Process: Theoretical and Methodological Issues


  • Emil ORDUKHANYAN Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law of NAS RA




comparative analysis, theoretical approach, methodological approach, discourse, political culture, political process


The political process, as one of political science primary categories, is an important basis for political analysis. The political reality is created as a result of human activity, and it is connected with interrelated political interests' realization aiming to achieve predefined goals.

The article explores the theoretical and methodological foundations of political process based on the analysis of relevant works in this field of study. The institutional, behavioral, structural-functional approaches as well as conflict, discourse, and other methods of political process analysis are examined.  

Summing up the results of explored issues, we concluded that political process is a dynamic and nonlinear political phenomenon that can vary in time, taking into account the impact of various direct or indirect factors.

A comparative analysis of political process research approaches has shown that any particular approach can be efficient only in an appropriate situation and political time. In case of other circumstances' presence, the same approach cannot be applied efficiently to a precise political process. It is also necessary to consider the peculiarities of political process due to the political culture model, dominant in the given society.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Emil ORDUKHANYAN, Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law of NAS RA

(PhD in Political Science) is Senior Researcher in the Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law of NAS RA; Associate Professor of Yerevan Brusov State University of Languages and Social Sciences. His areas of interest include political culture, political discourse, political process and institutions. Ordukhanyan is the author of 5 monographs (4 co-authored), 2 handbooks and 34 articles. Recent publications: “Evaluating Political Regime through Discourse Measurement of Political Culture: The Case of the Republic of Armenia”, “A Comparative Analysis of Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Political Culture”.


Averyanov, Y. (1993). Politologiya: Entsiklopedicheski slovar' (Political Science: Encyclopedic Vocabulary, in Russian). Moscow: Moscow Commercial University Publishing.

Baranov, N., & Pikalov, G. (2003). Teoriya politiki: Politicheski proces (Theory of Politics: Political Process, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: BGTU publishing. Retrieved September 21, 2018, from http://politics.ellib.org.ua/pages-164.html.

Caren, N. (2007). Political Process Theory. Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Retrieved May 1, 2018 from: http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405124331_chunk_g978140512433122_ss1-41.

Dahrendorf, R. (1972). Konflikt und Freiheit. München: Thomas Haker GmbH & Co. KG.

Dahrendorf, R. (1988). The Modern Social Conflict. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Dahrendorf, R. (1990). Doroga k svobode: demokratizatsiya i ee problemi v Vostochnoi Evrope (Road to Liberty: Democratisation and Its Problems in Western Europe, in Russian). Questions of Philosophy, 9, 69-75.

Dahrendorf, R. (1993). Ot social'nogo gosudarstva k civilizovannomu soobshestvu (From Social State to Civilised Community, in Russian). Polis journal, 5, 31-35.

Degtyarev, A. (1998). Osnovi politicheskoi teorii (Foundations of Political Theory, in Russian). Moscow: Visshaya Shkola.

Durkheim, E. (1990). Les règles de la method sociologique. Paris: Puf.

Easton, D. (1953). The Political System. An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Knopf.

Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Easton, D. (1997). The Future of the Postbehavioural Phase in Political Science. In K. Monroe (Ed.), Contemporary Empirical Political Theory (pp. 13-46). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. (2004). Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Gumplowicz, L. (1999).The Outlines of Sociology. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Isayev, B. (2013). Vvedeniye v politicheskuyu teoriyu: osnovniye teoreticheskie podkhodi k issledovaniyu politicheskogo procesa (Introduction to Political Theory: Main Theoretical Approaches to Political Process Research, in Russian).Saint Petersburg: SPB.

Laslett, P., & Fishkin, J. (1979). Philosophy, Politics, and Society. Yale: Yale University Press.

Le Bon, G. (1910). La Psychologie politique et la défense sociale. Paris: E. Flammarion.

Mannheim, K. (1950). Freedom, Power, and Democratic Planning. New York: Oxford University Press.

McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1996). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource Mobilisation and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. AmericanJournal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.

Meleshkina, Y. (2001). Politicheski proces: osnovnye aspekti i sposobi analiza (Political Process: Main Aspects and Methods of Analysis, in Russian). Moscow: Ves Mir.

Merriam, C. (1931). The Making of Citisens: A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merriam, C. (1997). Noviye aspekti politiki (New Aspects of Politics, in Russian). In G. Semigin (Ed.), Anthology of World Political Thought. Foreign Political Thought of 20th Century (pp. 176-183). Moscow: Misl’.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ordukhanyan, E. (2010). Ishxanut’yan & y’nddimut’yan qaghaqakan xosuyt’i verluc’ut’yun (The Discourse Analysis of Power and Opposition, in Armenian). Yerevan: Limush.

Pareto, V. (1961). On Logical and Non-Logical Action. In T. Parsons (Ed.), Theories of Society; Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory (pp. 1061-1062). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

Parsons, T. (1975). The Present Status of ‘Structural-Functional’ Theory in Sociology. Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. New York: The Free Press.

Parsons, Т. (1966). Societies: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Parsons, Т. (1997). O ponyatii “politicheskoi vlasti” (On the Notion of “Political Power”, in Rus-sian). In G. Semigin (Ed.), Anthology of World Political Thought. Foreign Political Thought of 20th Century (pp. 479-486). Moscow: Misl’.

Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1978). Poor People’s Movements: Why they Succeed, How they Fail. New York: Vintage Books.

Pocock, J. (1985). Virtue and History. Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteen Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rose, J. (1971). Introduction to Sociology. Michigan: Rand McNally.

Shutov, A. (1994). Politicheskii proces (Political Process, in Russian). Moscow: Moscow University Publishing.

Skinner, Q. (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Solovyev, A. (2000). Politologiya. Politicheskaya teoriya. Politicheskie tekhnologii (Political Science. Political Theory. Political Technologies, in Russian). Moscow: Aspect Press.

Tarde, G. (2000). Les lois sociales. Esquisse d'une sociologie (1898). (H. C Warren, Trans). Kitchener: Batoche Books.

Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Mass Politics in the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilisation to Revolution. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Tilly, C. (1995). Contentious Repertories in Great Britain, 1758-1834. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action (pp. 15-42). Durham: Duke University Press.

van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




How to Cite

ORDUKHANYAN, E. (2019). A Comparative Study of Political Process: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. WISDOM, 13(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v13i2.246




Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.