International Legal and Philosophical Aspects of the New Protection Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind
Philosophical and Legal Worldview
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v15i2.330Keywords:
protection of human rights, common heritage of mankind, international law, philosofical worldview, air and space law, sea law, legal existenceAbstract
The article is devoted to the systematize the characteristics of objects of the common heritage of mankind, to study the historical origins and connections of the concept of the common heritage of mankind with other legal categories and worldview systems, to determine the prospects of application of the concept in its legal and worldview aspects. The work is based on a set of approaches united in sociological legal consciousness, primarily historical, communicative and psychological ones, and on the methodological basis of I. Kant’s philosophy. The concept of the common heritage of mankind in the context of trans-historical development of social consciousness as an important system-making factor of societies of macro-level scales for the first time is investigated in the research. Mankind should return to its social consciousness an intersubjective relation to its planetary natural environment, that is, its inclusion in its multilevel diversity and recognition of its “subjectivity”, if not in a legal sense, then in the awareness of its complexity, self-regulatory properties, the need for its constant cognition in feedback mode – this idea should be the main new concept of protection of the common heritage of mankind.
Downloads
References
Antselevich, G. A., & Radzivill, A. A. (1997). Razvitie pravovykh voprosov (The Development of Antarctic Legal Issues by the UN General Assembly Resolutions, in Russian). In Antarktika: istoriya, sovremennost, perspektivy (Antarctica: history, modernity, prospects, in Russian) (pp. 102-119). ?yiv: Naukova dumka.
Balard, M., & Ducellier, A. (1998). Le partage du monde: échanges et colonisation dans la Méditerranée médiévale. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
Barberis, J. A. (1980). Los recursos naturales compartidos entre estados et el derecho internasoinal. Revue internationale de droit comparé, 32(3), 648-649.
Baskin, Iu. Ia., & Feldman, D. I. (1990). Istoria mezhdunarodnogo prava (History of International Law, in Russian). Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniya.
Bidler, R. B. (1976). The Settlement of International Evironmental Disputes. In Wisconsin Sea Grant College Program, Technical Report 231. Madison: University of Wisconsin University.
Cocca, A. A. (1981). The Advances in International Law. Through the Law of Outer Space. Journal of Space Law, 9(1), 13-21.
Colombos, C. J. (1967). The International Law of the Sea (6th rev. ed.). London: London Longmans.
Dillon, M., & Chadwick, N. (1967). The Celtic Realms (History and Civilisation). London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson; N.Y.: New American Library.
Grotius, H. (1916). The Freedom of the Seas. New York, Oxford University Press, American Branch. Retrieved March 31, 2020 from: https://archive.org/details-/freedomofseasorr1916grot/page/n5/mode/2up.
Grotius, H. (2014). The Rights of War and Peace. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Retrieved March 31, 2020 from: https://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/grotius-war-peace.
Herdegen, M. (2013). Principles of International Economic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X12001362.
Kant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. D. Wood, Trans. and Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved March 31, 2020 from: http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf.
Kant, I. (1784). Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View (Lewis White Beck, Trans.). From Immanuel Kant, “On History”. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Co. Retrieved March 31, 2020 from: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/-kant/universal-history.htm.
Kant, I. (1795). Toward Perpetual Peace (H. Reiss, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge nd University Press.
Kiss, A. Ch. (1983). La nation de patrimoine commun de l’humanite. Recueil des Cour, 175, 99-256.
Kofanov, L. L. (Ed.). (2002). Digesty Yustiniana (Justinian Digest, in Russiam), Vol. 1. Moscow: Statut.
Larsen, S. (Ed.). (2004). Tragediya soobshchestv: obshchie resursy i individual’nyie interesy (The Tragedy of Communities: Shared Resources and Individual Interests, in Russian). In Teoriya I metody v sotsyalnyh naukah (Theory and Methods in the Social Science) (pp. 206-225). Moscow: MGIMO. ROSSPEN.
Lukashuk, I. I. (1997). Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Osobiennaya chast’ (International Law. Special part, in Russian). ?oscow: BEK.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (D. Kellne, Ed.). London, New York: Routledge Classics. Retrieved March 31, 2020 from: https://libcom.org/files/Marcuse,%20H%20-%20OneDimensional%20Man,%202nd%-20edn.%20(Routledge,%202002).pdf.
Morozova, L. A. (1999). Antropologiya mirovoy pravovoy mysli. Yevropa V- ?VII vv (Anthology of World Legal Thought. Europe V-XVII Centuries, in Russian), Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl’.
OSCE. (2011). OSCE Human Dimension Commitments. Thematic Compilation, 1 (3rd Ed.). War-saw, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Retrieved March 31, 2020 from: https://www.osce.org/odihr/76894?download=true.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1986). Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. London: Fontana Press.
Prudchenko, Ye. V. (Ed.). (2007). Kopengagenski kriterii (Copenhagen criteria, in Russian). Dnipropetrovsk: Tsentr Yevropeyskoi informatsii. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from: http://ukrcei.org/uploads/files/default/kopengagenskie_kriterii.pdf.
Radzivill, O. A. (2017). Pravo narodiv vid neolitu do Novogo chasu (The right of peoples from the Neolithic to modern times, in Ukrainian), Vol. 1. Kyiv: NAU.
Radzivill, O., & Pyvovar, Y. (2019). Philosophical and Legal Concepts in the Context of Regulating National and International Public Order. In I. Sopilko (Ed.), Jurisprudence in the Modern Information Space (pp. 40-54). ?anada, Hamilton: Accent Graphics Communcations & Publishing.
Radzivill, O., Pyvovar, Y., Sopilko, I., & Pyvovar, I. (2018). Coordination of Fragmentation within the International Air Law. International Journal of Engineering & Technology (UAE), 7(3.30), 280-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18260.
Rao, K. (1981). Common Heritage of Mankind and the Moon Treaty. Indian Journal of International Law, 21(2), 275-278.
Reale, J., & Anticery, D. (2003). Ot romantizma do nashih dnei. V Zapadnaia filosofia oy istokov do nashih dnei (From Romantisism to Present Day. In Western Philosophy from its Origins to the Present Day, in Russian), Vol. 4.Saint Petersburg: Pnevma.
Rulan, N. (2000). Yuridicheskaya antropologiya (Legal Anthropology, in Russian). Moscow: Norma.
Shchiptsov, A. A., & Iefremov, V. S. (1997). Osvoieniye Antarktiki (Exploration of the Antarctic, in Russian). In Antarktika: istoriya, sovremennost, perspektivy (Antarctica: History, Modernity, Prospects) (pp. 27-39). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1955). The phenomenon of man. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Tuskoz, Zh. (1998). Mezhdunarodnoie pravo (International Law, in Russian). ?yiv: ArtEK.
United Nations (n.d.). Oceans and the Law of the Sea. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from: https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/oceans-and-law-sea/index.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.