Demonolexis In Mykola Gogol’s Works: Philosophical and Linguocultural Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.386Keywords:
demonological lexis, demon name, anthroponym, onym, philosophical aspect, linguoculturological aspect, paganism, mythological system, personification, ChristianityAbstract
The peculiarities of functioning of demonological lexis in the works of Mykola Gogol in the philosophical and linguocultural perspectives are considered in the article. Demonological lexis is determined to be one of the essential segments of ethnocultural representation. It is projected on linguistic culture and creates a peculiar semiotic culture of a particular ethnic group. Ukrainians’ belief in non-Christian culture various mystical forces along with sincere faith in one God, promotes active development of their spiritual culture and philosophical worldview. It is reflected in the artistic heritage.
The purpose of the article is the analysis of Ukrainian demonology in Mykola Gogol’s works.
The subject of the research is demonological lexis in Mykola Gogol’s works.
The methods such as analysis and synthesis, descriptive, observation, contextual-interpretive, linguistic-stylistic were used for achieving the goal.
Ukrainian demonology is proved to be a part of Slavic mythology identity and its attributive element. The philosophical aspect of the article is realized in demonological magic, the connection of the corporeal, spiritual, soul with the body, psychophysiological phenomena, altered states of reality etc. The authors analyzed the existing classifications of demonological lexis and defined that the Ukrainian demonological lexis forms structural, impaired, open microsystem in its constant development.
Downloads
References
Abayev, V. I. (1958). Obraz Vija v povesti N. V. Gogolya (The Image of Wii in the Novel by N. V. Gogol). In Russkiy fol’klor. Materialy i issledovanija (Russian Folklore. Materials and Research, in Russian) (Vol. 3) (pp. 303-307). Moscow-Leningrad: Akademiya Nauk USSR.
Bulgakov, S. N. (1953). Filosofiya imeni (Philosophy of the Name, in Russian). Pariz: Ymca-Press.
Chubynsky, P. (1995). Mudrist vikiv. Ukrainoznavstvo u tvirchiy spadschyni Pavla Chubynskogo (Wisdom of Centuries. Ukrainian Linguistics in Pavlo Chubynsky’s Work in 2 books, in Ukrainian) (Book 1.). Kyiv: Mystetstvo.
Filin, F. (1982). Ocherki po teorii yazikoznaniya (Essays on the Theory of Linguistics, in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.
Florensky, P. A. (1998). Imena: Sochineniya (Names. Writings, in Russian). Moscow: CJSC Edition EXMO-PRESS.
Gogol, N. V. (1989). Vechera na khutore bliz Dykanka (Evenings in Khutir Near Dykanka, in Russian). Mirgorod, Kharkov: Prapor.
Gogol, ?. (2008). Zibrannya tvoriv (Collection of Works in 7 volumes, in Ukrainian). (Vol. 2). (M. G. Zhulinskiy, Ed.). Kyiv: NVP “Publishing House “Naukova dumka”.
Gritsenko, O. (1998). “Svoya mudrist”: Natsionalni mifologii ta “gromadyanska religia” v Ukraini (Own Wisdom: National Mythology and “Civil Religion” in Ukraine, in Ukrainian). Kyiv: UCKD.
Humboldt, V. (1984). Izbrannye trudy po yazikoznaniyu (Selected Works on Linguistics, in Russian). Moscow: Progress.
Khudash, M. A. (1977). Z istorii ukrainskoyi antroponoponimii (From the History of the Ukrainian Antroponymy, in Ukrainian). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
Krasnykh, V. (2003). “Svoi” sredi “chuzhikh”: mif ili realnost (“Just One” among “Strangers”: Myth or Reality, in Russian). Moscow: ITDK “Gnosis”.
Losev, A. F. (1990). Filosofiya imeni (Philosophy of the Name, in Russian). Moscow: Publishing House MGU.
Lukinova, T. (1981). Davnoslov’yanski viruvannya v dzerkali leksiki slov’yanskih mov (do etymologii sliv upyr, netopyr) (Ancient Slavic Beliefs in the Mirror of the Slavic Languages Vocabulary (to Etymology of the Words Ghoul, Bat), in Ukrainian). Linguistics, 6, 56-68.
Melnychuk, A. (1970). Ponyatie sistemy i struktury yazika v svete dialekticheskogo materializma (voprosy yazikoznanya). (Notion of the Language System and Structure in the Light of Dialectical Materialism, in Russian). Linguistic Issues, 1, 26-31.
Merezhkovsky, D. (2007). Gogol. Tvorchestvo, zhyzn i religiya (Gogol. Work, Life and Religion, in Russian). Moscow: Biblioteka “Vehi”. Retrieved from: http://-www.vehi.net/merezkovsky/gogol/01.html.
Mify narodov mira (1980). (Myths of Nations of the World in 2 volumes, in Russian). (Vol. 1). Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya.
Nechuy-Levytsky, I. (1993). Svitoglyad ukrainskogo narodu. Eskiz ukrainskoyi mifologii. (Worldview of the Ukrainian People. Sketch of the Ukrainian Mythology, in Ukrainian). (2nd ed.). Kyiv: JSC “Oberegy”.
Ogienko, I. (Ilarion Mytropolyt) (1992). Dohrystyanski viruvannya ukrayinskogo narodu. Istorychno-religiyna monografiya. (Pre-Chrisitan Beliefs of the Ukrainian People. Historical-Religious Monograph, in Ukrainian). Kyiv: Oberegy.
Potebnya, A. (1958). Iz zapisok po russkoy grammatike (From Notes on Russian Grammar in 4 volumes, in Russian). (Vol. 1/2). Moscow: Uchpedgiz. Prosveschenie.
Potebnya, A. (1989). Slovo I mif (Word and Myth, in Russian). Moscow: Pravda.
Scherba, L. V. (1957). Izbrannye raboty po russkomu yazyku (Selected works in the Russian Language, in Russian). Moscow: Uchpedgiz.
Sumtsov, N. (1891). Kolduny, vedmy i upyri (Sorcerers, Witches and Ghouls, in Russian). Collection of Kharkov Historical-Philological Society. Bibliographic Index (Vol. 3, pp. 229-278). Kharkov: Printing House K. P. Schasny.
Superanskaya, A. V. (1988). K probleme tipologii antroponimicheskih osnov (On the Problem of Typology of Antroponymic Foundations, in Russian). In Onomastics. Typology. Stratigraphy. Collection of articles (pp. 8-18). Moscow: Nauka.
Tyapkina, N. I. (2006). Demonologichna leksyka ukrainskoyi movy (Demonolexics of the Ukrainian Language, in Ukrainian): Thesis for the Candidate Degree in Philology. Zaporizzya.
Vasilyev, S. (1992). Poetika “Viy”: N. V. Gogol, problemy tvorchestva (Poetics “Viy”: N. V. Gogol, Problems of the Work, in Russian). St. Petersburg: Obrazovanie.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.