Axioms of Philosophy in Aristotle’s Metaphysics

Authors

Robert DJIJIAN Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University
Hasmik HOVHANNISYAN Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.395

Keywords:

axiom, the axiom of philosophy, the choice of an axiom, the set of axioms, the priority of ontology

Abstract

The goal of this article is to study Aristotle’s concept of philosophical principles. Metaphysics required from a philosopher to reveal the axioms of his teaching. It declared the law of contradiction as the most certain of all principles and axioms. This article proves that Aristotelian definition of truth makes it necessary to accept the ontological formulations of all the three main laws of thought as axioms of first philosophy. This article points out the absence of any reference in Metaphysics on Categorias and vice versa. This circumstance questions if could Aristotle be the author of the both works? Authors of this article underline that the modern trend of meta-philosophical studies requires investigating the possibility of building the system of axiomatic philosophy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Robert DJIJIAN, Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Philosophy) is Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Logic Named after Academician Georg Brutian at Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University, Yerevan, Armenia. Member of the Editorial board of WISDOM journal. His areas of interest include metaargumentation, independent thinking, artificial intelligence. R. Djidjian is the author of 8 monographs and about 60 scientific articles. Recent publications: “The Secret of Geniality”, “Getting Ready for Great Discoveries”, “Optimal Sociology”, “Building the General Theory of Metaargumentation”, “A System of Artificial Intelligence”.

Hasmik HOVHANNISYAN, Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Philosophy) is the Head of the Department of Philosophy and Logic Named after Academician Georg Brutian at Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University, Yerevan, Armenia; Editor in Chief of WISDOM journal. Her areas of interest include logic, argumentation theory, metaargumentation, philosophy for children, critical thinking. Hovhannisyan is the author of 5 monographs and 54 scientific articles. Recent publications: “Argumentation and Meta-argumentation”, “Metaargumentation as a Metatheory of Argumentation”, “Building the General Theory of Metaargumentation”, “Problems of Argumentation in Medieval Armenian Philosophy”, “Problems with Teaching Critical Thinking”, “Independent Thinking is a Challenge to the Modern Education System”.

References

Anagnostopoulos, G. (Ed.) (2009). A Companion to Aristotle. Chichester: Wiley-Black well.

Aristotle. Categories. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/categories.html.

Aristotle. Metaphysics. The internet classics archive: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle-/metaphysics.html.

Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. The internet classics archive: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/pos teri-or.html.

Aristotle. Prior Analytics. The internet classics archive: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/prior.ht ml.

Bell, I. (2004). Metaphysics as an Aristotelian Science. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.

Djidjian R. & Hovhannisyan, H. (2019). Opyt aksiomaticheskogo postroeniya teorii poznaniya (Building an Axiomatic System of Epistemology, in Russian). Bulletin of Moscow City Pedagogical University, series Philosophical sciences, 1 (29), 31-40. doi: 10.25688/2078-92382019.29.1.04.

Fraser, K. (2002). Demonstrative Science and the Science of Being qua Being. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 22, 43-82.

Gill, M. (2006). First Philosophy in Aristotle. In M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin, A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (pp. 347-373). Malden: Blackwell.

Gill, M.-L. (2005). Aristotle’s Metaphysics Reconsidered. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 43, 223-251.

Hovhannisyan, H., & Djidjian, R. (2018). Aksiomatizaciya gumanitarnikh nauk – imperativ epokhi tsifrovykh tekhnologii (Axiomatization of Humanitarian Sciences – Imperative of the Epoch of Digital Technologies, in Russian). Bulletin of Moscow City Pedagogical University, series Philosophical Sciences, 3(28), 47-57. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35617771.

Hovhannisyan, H. (2007). Argumentation and Meta-Argumentation. In G. A. Brutian (Ed.), Philos-ophy and Meta-philosophy, Book 1 (pp. 64-67).

Hovhannisyan, H. (2008, April). Argumentation and Meta-Argumentation. News and Views, 18, 22-25.

Hovhannisyan, H. (2014). Meta-Argumentation from the Perspective of Metaphilosophy. Wisdom, 1(2), 80-89.

Hovhannisyan, H. (2015). Meta-Argumentation as an Argumentation Metatheory. Metaphilosophy, 46(3), 479-487.

https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12143.

Hovhannisyan, H., & Djidjian, R. (2017). Building a General Theory of Meta-Argumentation. Metaphilosophy, 48(3), 354-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12242.

Kotwick, M. (2016). Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Berkeley. Re-trieved from: https://www.lulu.com/shop/mirjam-kotwick/alexander-of-aphrodisias-and-the-text-of-aristotles-metaphysics.

Lazerowitz, M. (1970). A Note on “Metaphilosophy”. Metaphilosophy, 1(1), 91.

Lukasiewicz, J. (1951). Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Makin, S. (2003). What Does Aristotle Mean by Priority in Substance? Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24, 209-238.

Marsoobian, A. (2007). Metaphilosophy. In J. Lachs & R. Talisse (Eds.), American Philosophy: An Encyclopedia (pp. 500-501).

Matthews, G. (2009). Aristotelian Categories. In G. Anagnostopoulos (Ed.), A Companion to Aris-totle (pp. 144-161). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P., & Burwood, S. (2013). An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge University Press.

Peramatzis, M. (2011). Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rogge, E. (1950). Axiomatik Alles Moglichen Philosophierens. Meisenheim/Glan: Westkulturverlag, A. Hain.

Russell, B. & Whitehead, A. (1911-1913). Principia Mathematica. (Vol. 1-3). Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Sharples, R. W. (2010). Peripatetic Philosophy, 200 BC to AD 200: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge University Press.

Shields, Chr. (2016). Aristotle. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/aristotle.

Stough, C. (1972). Language and Ontology in Aristotle’s Categories. Journal of the History of Phi-losophy, 10, 261-272.

van Inwagen, P. & Sullivan, M. (2018). Metaphysics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclope-dia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/-archives/spr2018/entries/metaphysics.

Wedin, M. (2002). Aristotle’s Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wedin, M. (2009). The Science and Axioms of Being. In G. Anagnostopoulos (Ed.), A Companion to Aristotle (pp. 125-143). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Yu, J. (2003). The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-25

How to Cite

DJIJIAN, R., & HOVHANNISYAN, H. (2020). Axioms of Philosophy in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. WISDOM, 16(3), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.395

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2020): 3-2020

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.