Updating Social Theory: Redefinition of Modernization

Authors

Vardgues POGOSYAN Russian State Social University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5985-7162

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.486

Keywords:

modernization, European Modernity, exogenous impact, complex system, innovation adoption

Abstract

The article considered a critical appraisal of the modernization theory in its mono-paradigm frames and offers a heterodox conceptual meaning of modernization. Obviously, the varieties of methodological ap- proaches to that important theoretical topic would have to be much more comprehensive than con- temporary interpretations of linear pattern mainstream theories propose. Rethinking the conceptual foun- dations of the existing interpretation of the very concept is the model of adaptive modernization. Protect- ing its own matrix core, the system carries out partial correction of specific parameters, in which there is a lag, to increase their own vitality. Constructive changes are intra-systemic and occur within the existing order, without destroying its foundations, main institutional structures, and preserve the generic socio- cultural genotype Modernization, as reception of foreign cultural innovations (technical and technological) with their appropriate adaptation to the endogenous conditions, is an adequate adaptive response of a so- cial system to external risks or exogenous origin impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vardgues POGOSYAN, Russian State Social University

(PhD in Social Philosophy and Philosophy of History, Dr. of Science in Sociology) is Professor of Sociology at Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia. The area of his professional interests includes social theory, social philosophy, historical sociology, social anthropology. Pogosyan has about 100 scientific and educational publications. He is the author/co-author of 6 monographs, 4 textbooks and 32 articles in referred journals. Recent publications: Sociocultural Determinism and Order Parameters; Change and Variability of Phenomena in Complex Social Systems; Philosophies of Social Behavior Research: Meta-Analytic Review; Institutional Reconstruction: Complete Alteration?

References

Alexander, J. C. (2003). The meanings of social life. A cultural sociology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Arnason, J. (2010). The cultural turn and the civilizational approach. European Journal of Social Theory 13(1), 67-82. doi: 10.1177/1368431009355866

Boas, F. (1940). Race, language, and culture. New York: The Macmillan Co.

Collier, J. (2010). A dynamical approach to identity and diversity in complex systems. In P. Cilliers & R. Preiser (Eds), Complexity, difference and identity. issues in business ethics (Vol. 26, pp. 79-93). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9187-1_5

Diamond, J. (2017). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking.

Eisenstadt, S. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1-30.

Fouracre, P. (2013). Frankish history: Studies in the construction of power. Variorum collected studies series. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.

Frank, A. G. (1998). ReOrient: Global economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Harris, M. (1979). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. New York: Random House.

Heylighen, F. (2008). Complexity and self-organization. In M.†J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (Vol. 2., pp. 1215-1224). Oxford: Taylor and Francis.

Lempert, D. (2019). Is modernization really unique in the history of human development (Or just another approach that will self-destruct)? Journal of Globalization Studies, 10(1), 27-43. doi: 10.30884/jogs/2019.01.03

Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of society. (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Pogosyan, V. (2018). Philosophies of social behavior research: Meta-analytic review. Wisdom, 11(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v11i2.212

Pogosyan, V. (2019). Change and variability of phenomena in complex social systems. Wisdom, 13(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v13i2.276

Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by Genes Alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Rousseau, D. (2015). General systems theory: Its present and potential. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 32(5), 522-533. Special Issue: ISSS Yearbook: Learning across Boundaries https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2354

Rueschemeyer, D. (1976). Partial modernization. In J. J. Loubser, R. C. Baum, A. Effrat, & V. Lidz (Eds.), Explorations in general theory in social science: Essays in honor of Talcott Parsons (Vol. 2., pp. 756-772). New York: Fress Press.

Subrt, J. (2017). The perspective of historical sociology: The individual as homo-sociologicus through society and history. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

Touraine, A. (1995). Critique of modernity. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

Urry, J. (2005). The complexities of the global. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(5), 235-254.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-25

How to Cite

POGOSYAN, V. (2021). Updating Social Theory: Redefinition of Modernization. WISDOM, 19(3), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.486

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2021): 3-2021

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.