Socio-Ecological Effect of Public Management of Green Development in the Context of the Philosophy of Modern Ecology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24231/wisdom.v19i3.493

Keywords:

philosophy, socio-ecological effect, ecology public administration, environmental protection

Abstract

In recent years, the idea of Green economy has been widely discussed by experts in environmental economics and in various political forums. Many countries use various tools and principles of Green economy in their national policies and growth strategies. However, some countries fear that the transition to a Green economy model may hamper their development in the context of the philosophy of modern ecology. That is why the formation of a clear methodology for the Green economy is essential today. The article discusses the prerequisites for implementation, the basic principles of Green economy into the pub- lic administration system, and provides a system for modelling ways to implement the principles of Green economy using the IDEF0 methodology in the context of the philosophy of modern modern philosophy ecology. This methodology allows seeing clearly the ways and means of achieving this goal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Myroslav KRYSHTANOVYCH, Lviv Polytechnic National University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Public Administration) is Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Innovative Education, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine. His areas of interest include philosophy, socio-ecological effect, ecology, public administration, environmental protection. Myroslav Kryshtanovych is the author of 80 scientific articles.

Valeriia GOLUB, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Public Administration) is Professor of the Department of Public Social Development and Social-Power Relations, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. Her areas of interest include philosophy, socio-ecological effect, ecology, public administration, environmental protection. Valeriia Golub is the author of 70 scientific articles.

Volodymyr KОZAKOV, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Public Administration) is Professor of the Department of public social development and Social-Power Relations, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. His areas of interest include philosophy, socio-ecological effect, ecology, public administration, environmental protection. Volodymyr Kоzakov is the author of 60 scientific articles.

Tetyana PAKHOMOVA , CAFERDA of Regional Policy and Public Administration of ORIGU NAGU under the President of Ukraine

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Public Administration) is Professor, Head of the CAFERDA of Regional Policy and Public Administration of ORIGU NAGU under the President of Ukraine. Her areas of interest include philosophy, socio-ecological effect, ecology, public administration, environmental protection. Tetyana Pakhomova is the author of 40 scientific articles.

Oleg POLOVTSEV, Kherson National Technical University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Public Administration) is Professor of the Department of Public Administration, Kherson National Technical University, Kherson, Ukraine. His areas of interest include philosophy, socio-ecological effect, ecology, public administration, environmental protection. Oleg Polovtsev is the author of 10 scientific articles.

References

Ahlert, G., & Meyer, B. (2013). Synopsis of approaches to welfare and of green economy concepts currently under discussion. Institute of Economic Structures Research. Osnabruck: GWS.

Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L.H., Mumford, K., & Oleson, K. (2012). Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environment and Development Economics, 17(3), 317-353.

Berezhnaya, Yu. (2019). Ponyattya ìzelena ekonomikaî: mizhnarodnyy aspekt (The concept of ìGreen economyî: International aspect, in Ukrainian). Scientific Notes Tauride National University Named after Vernadsky. Series: Jurisprudence, 1, 210-215.

Bowen, A. (2012). ëGreení growth, ëgreení jobs and labor markets. Working Paper. Grantham Research Institute. London, UK. Retrieved July 2, 2013 from http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publications/WorkingPapers/Papers/70-79/WP76-green-growth-green-jobs-labour-markets.pdf.

Breitschopf, B., Nathani, C., & Resch, G. (2012). Methodological guidelines for estimating the employment impacts of using renewable energies for electricity generation. ìEconomic and Industrial Developmentî EID - EMPLOY. Final report Task 1. Study commissioned by IEA-RETD (Renewable Energy Technology Deployment). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260434928_Methodological_guidelines_for_estimating_the_employment_impacts_of_using_renewable_energies_for_electricity_generation

Chmyr, A., & Zakharkevich, N. (2020). Zelena ekonomika: sutnistí, tsili ta osnovni pryntsypy (Green economy: Essence, goals and basic principles, in Ukrainian). Economic Bulletin of Donbass, 3(33), 54-62

Deschenes, O. (2010). Climate policy and labor markets. NBER Working Papers, No. 16111. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Grubler, A. (2018). A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5C target and sustainable development goals without negative emissions technologies. Nature Energy, 3, 515-527.

Khutorova, N. (2019). Ecological modernization - from theory to practice. Forest Herald, 2(4), 33-40

Kuhnhenn, K. (2018). Economic growth in mitigation scenarios: A blind spot in climate science. Berlin: Heinrich Boll Foundation.

Low, L. (2011). Green economy: Implications for development planning. London: Climate and Development Knowledge Network.

Lutsko, V. (2019). Vlada, tekhnolohichno ekolohichna bezpeka ta prava lyudyny (Power, technologically ecological security and human rights, in Ukrainian). In Proceedings of National Conference ì50 Anniversary of the General Declaration of Human Rightsî (pp. 161-165). Lviv UAD publishing.

OíNeill, D. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88-95.

Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 63-73.

Pidlisnyuk, V., Zagirnyak, M., & Irkova, I. (2020). Stratehiya zelenoyi ekonomiky ta zminy klimatu (Strategy for Green economy and climate change). Kremenchug: Kremenchug Publishing house ìScherbatykhî.

Prakash, A., & Potoski, V. (2006). The voluntary environmentalists: Green clubs, ISO 14001, and voluntary environmental regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Satbyul, K., Ho, K., & Yeora, C. (2014, November). A new approach to measuring Green economy: Application to the OECD and Korea. Futures, 63, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.002

Vanieva, A. (2020). Stvorennya ta poshuk perspektyvnykh pryrodnykh resursiv na osnovi vtorynnykh resursiv (Creation and search for promising natural resources based on secondary resources, in Ukrainian). (Electronic resource). Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/14_ENXXI_2013/Economics/13_136553.doc.htm

Volkery, A., & Rouabhi, S. (2015). Green economy and sustainable development. A historical account of the discourse around sustainable development and green economy, KNOSSOS policy briefings: green economy, discussion paper, UNEP, IEEP, GLOBE-EU, Topic. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/research4policy/policybriefs/tabid/78428/Default.aspx

Zervas, E. (2012). Green economy versus sustainable development. In S. Eslamian (Ed.), Recent advances in energy, environment and economic development. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Development, Energy, Environment, Economics (DEEE 12) December 2-4 (pp. 399-404). Paris, France. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313665528_Green_Growth_Versus_Sustainable_Development

Downloads

Published

2021-09-25

How to Cite

KRYSHTANOVYCH, M., GOLUB, V., KОZAKOV V., PAKHOMOVA , T., & POLOVTSEV, O. (2021). Socio-Ecological Effect of Public Management of Green Development in the Context of the Philosophy of Modern Ecology. WISDOM, 19(3), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.24231/wisdom.v19i3.493

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2021): 3-2021

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Author and scientific journal WISDOM

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)