Keywords:theory of cognition, axiomatic system, definitions of concepts, proof of theorems
This article is the first complete axiomatic presentation of the theory of cognition (epistemology). It presents the axioms of the theory of cognition, the definitions of the concepts and categories used in the text of the theory, and also provides detailed proofs of the propositions (theorems) arising from them. Based on this axiomatic system, evidence-based solutions to the problems (aporias) of the theory of cognition are proposed. This system of axiomatic epistemology can serve as a step in building a rigorous scientific theory of human cognition. The axioms of the proposed system follow the Aristotelian general understanding of the essence of human cognition.
Aristotle. Metaphysics. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.html
Aristotle. On the soul. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.html
Bacon, F. (1620). The New Organon. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from https://constitution.org/2-authors/bacon/nov_org.htm
Capps, J. (2019). The pragmatic theory of truth. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Re-trieved January 20, 2023 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/truth-pragmatic/
Darwin, Ch. (2001/1859). On the origin of species. Harvard Paperbacks.
David, M. (2022). The correspondence theory of truth. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/truth-correspondence/
Djidjian, R. (2004). Your way to great discoveries. Yerevan: Yerevan State University Press.
Djidjian, R. (2016). Paradoxes of human cognition. WISDOM, 7(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v7i2.137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v7i2.137
Djidjian, R., & Hovhannisyan, H. (2020). Axioms of philosophy in Aristotleís Metaphysics. WIS-DOM, 16(3), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.395
Fortunato, S. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185
Halbach, V., & Leigh, G. E. (2022). Axiomatic theories of truth. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/truth-axiomatic/
Hilbert, D. (1999/1899). Foundations of Geometry. (2nd ed). Open Court.
Hintikka, J. (2011). What is axiomatic method? Synthese, 183(1), 69-857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9668-8
Hovhannisyan, H. (2008). Argumentation and meta-argumentation. News and Views, 18, 22-25.
Hovhannisyan, H. (2014). Metaargumentation from the perspective of metaphilosophy. WISDOM, 2(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v2i1.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i2.47
Hovhannisyan, H. (2015). Meta-argumentation as an argumentation metatheory. Metaphilosophy, 46(3), 479-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12143
Hovhannisyan, H., & Djidjian, R. (2017). Building a general theory of meta-argumentation. Metaphilosophy, 48(3), 354-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12242
Kleene, S. K. (1952). Introduction to metamathematics. Ishi Press.
Lavenda, B. H. (2012). A new perspective on relativity: An odyssey in non-euclidean geometries. World Scientific Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/8083
Lobachevsky, N. (2010). Pangeometry. Heritage of european mathematics series. (Vol. 4). European Mathematical Society.
Lukasiewicz, J. (1957). Aristotle's syllogistic from the standpoint of modern formal logic. (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Munafo, M. (2017). Metascience: Reproducibility blues. Nature, 543(7647), 619-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/543619a
Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12(1878), 286-302.
Rav, Y. (2008). The axiomatic method in theory and in practice. Logique et Analyse, NOUVELLE SERIE, 51(202, Juin), 125-147.
Rogge, E. (1950). Axiomatik alles moglichen philosophierens. Meisenhelm/Glan.
Sen, P. (1996). Axiomatic philosophy. New Age International.
Stove, D. (1991). The Plato cult and other philosophical follies. Oxford: Blackwell.
The 2009 PhilPapers survey. Results, analysis and discussion. (2009). PhilPapers. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from https://philpapers.org/surveys/
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Robert DJIDJIAN, Hasmik HOVHANNISYAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.