Exploring the Origin of the Present-Day Human Self on the Fringes of Linguistic Advancement
Keywords:present-day human self (PHS), software archaeology, fringe-mind/mentality, bicameral mind/mentality (BM), propositional attitudes (PA), linguistic advancement, PHM-concepts, bicameral concepts
The paper explores the possibility of the evolution of the present-day adult human self (PHS) with linguistic advancements. Considering fringe mentality as a genuine issue during the evolution of PHS, the paper favours that there can be various types of mentalities associated with various kinds of minds, among which present-day adult human mind (PHM) having PHS is only one kind. It explores the logical possibility of a different mentality in our remote ancestors to broaden the contours of the concept of self and mind. Part one is expository in nature and discusses the distinctive features of the present-day adult human self (PHS). Following Sleutels’s (2013) approach, the second part analyses the assumption that the PHS is an innately given inner experience by positing the ‘fringe mind’ problem. Julian Jaynes’s (1976) claim is approached with the help of the linguistic mechanism involved in the emergence of propositional attitudes (PA) to argue that PHS can also be a matter of linguistic advancement rather than mere biological or psychological adaptive advancement. An attempt to address Sleutels (2006) less developed notion of B-mind and A-mind is also made.
Albahari, M. (2006). Analytical Buddhism: The two-tiered illusion of self. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bermúdez, J. L. (2003). Thinking without words. Oxford University Press. Retrieved May 13, 2021, from https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159691.001.0001/acprof-9780195159691
Block, N. (1977). Review of Julian Jaynes, Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicam-eral Mind. Boston Globe. Retrieved May 13, 2021 from https://philpapers.org/rec/BLOROJ-2
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00038188
Davidson, D. (1999). The emergence of thought. Erkenntnis, 51(1), 7-17.
Dennett, D. (1986). Julian Jaynes’s software archeology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadi-enne, 27(2), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080051
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. William Morrow & Co.
Humberstone, I. L. (1992). Direction of fit. Mind, 101(401), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/101.401.59
Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson, D. M. (2003). How history made the mind: The cultural origins of objective thinking. Open Court.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914
Parfit, D. (1971). Personal identity. The Philosophical Review, 80(1), 3-27. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184309
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Rochat, P. (2003). Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Consciousness and Cog-nition, 12(4), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00081-3
Ryle, G. (1951). The concept of mind. Hutchinson’s University Library. http://archive.org/details/conceptofmind032022mbp
Sleutels, J. (2006). Greek zombies. Philosophical Psychology, 19(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500462412
Sleutels, J. (2013). Fringe mind strategies. AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, IV(2), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.12849/40202013.0709.0004
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 scientific journal WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.