Contemporary Art vs Totalitarian Art: Semiotic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v23i3.821Keywords:
avant-garde, contemporary art, totalitarian art, mass culture, semiotic approach, postmodernismAbstract
The article provides a semiotic analysis of the types of totalitarian culture and its manifestation in art, both classical and modern. On the basis of totalitarian culture semiotic analyses, it is shown that mass culture (and its attributes) may be considered a modern type of totalitarian culture. Particularly, the antidogmatic and antitotalitarian essence of the contemporary art phenomenon is highlighted. Based on the semiotic methodology, a key moment of demarcation between contemporary art and the ‘totalitarian’ one has been emphasized. The conclusion about the inconsistency of signs and symbols of contemporary as compared to totalitarian art has been drawn. Contemporary art could be referred to as a tool for tracing, revealing and even combating totalitarianism in culture and life.
Downloads
References
Antonyan, Y. (2016). Issledovaniye totalitarizma (The investigation of totalitarianism, in Russian). Moscow: Yurlitinform.
Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism: New eition with added prefaces. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Bychkov, V. (2008). Postneklassicheskaya estetika: K voprosu o sovremennom esteticheskom znanii (Post-non-classical aesthetics: On the question of the formation of modern aesthetic knowledge, in Russian). Filosofskiy zhurnal (Philosophical Magazine, in Russian), 1, 90-108.
Bychkov, V. (2015). Khudozhestvennost' kak sushchnostnyy printsip iskusstva (Workmanship as an essential principle of art, in Russian). (Voprosy filosofii Questions of Philosophy, in Russian), 3, 3-14.
Bychkov, V. (2018). O dukhovnosti v iskusstve (On the spirituality in art). Voprosy Filosofii (Problems of Philosophy, in Russian), 5, 76-87.
Dunayevskiy, I. (2017, June 16). Putin rasskazal o svoyem otnoshenii k Stalinu (Putin spoke about his attitude towards Stalin, in Russian). Rossiyskaya Gazeta (Russian Gazette, in Russian). Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://rg.ru/2017/06/16/putin-rasskazal-o-svoem-otnoshenii-k-stalinu.html
Eco, U. (1968). La struttura assente. La ricerca semiotica e il metodo strutturale (The absent structure. Se-miotic research and the structural method, in Italian). Milan: Bompiani.
Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Friedrich, C. J., & Brzezinski, Z. K. (1965). Totalitarian dictatorship and autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Golomshtok, I. (1994). Totalitarnoye iskusstvo (Totalitarian art, in Russian). Moscow: Galart.
Griffin, R. (2007). Modernism and fascism: The sense of a beginning under Mussolini and Hitler. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596122
Groys, B. (2015). Sotsialisticheskiy fol'klor (Socialistic folklore, in Russian). Iskusstvo kino (Film Art, in Russian), 5, 57-72.
Gutov, D. (2007). Marksistsko-leninskaya estetika v postkommunisticheskuyu epokhu. Mikhail Lifshits (Marxist-Leninist aesthetics in the post-communist era. Mikhail Lifshits, in Russian). Svobodnaya mysl' (Free Thought, in Russian), 2, 125-141.
Hitler, A. (2009). Mein Kampf (My struggle, in Russian). (M. Ford, Trans.). Camarillo, California: Elite Minds.
Kablukov, E. (2020). Iosif Stalin i Vladimir Putin: Praktiki postroyeniya obraza politicheskogo lidera v diskurse sovetskikh i rossiyskikh SM (Joseph Stalin & Vladimir Putin practices of the image construction of a political leader in the discourse of Soviet and Russian media, in Russian). Przeglad Wschodnioeuropejski (East European Review, in Polish), 11(2), 73-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.6490
Kandinsky, W. (1946). On the spiritual in art. New York: Solomon R. Guggemheim Foundation.
Kemenov, V. S., & Sarabyanov, D. V. (Eds.). (1957). Istoriya russkogo iskusstva (The history of Russian art, in Russian). (Vol. 11). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Kosuth, J. (1993). Art after philosophy and after: Collected writings. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press.
Lavrentyev, A. (2007). Istoriya dizayna: uchebnoye posobiye (History of design: Study guide, in Russian). Moscow: Gardariki.
Lifshitz, M. (1978). Iskusstvo i sovremennyy mir (Art and the modern world, in Russian). Moscow: Izobrazitel'noye iskusstvo.
Lindinger, H. (1991). The nation of functionalism. In C. Pirovano (Ed.), The dominion of design. History of industrial design 1919-1990 (pp. 79-124). Milan: Electa.
Losev, A. (2005). Ob iskusstve (On art, in Russian). Saint-Petersburg: Art-SPb.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1983). Answering questions: What is postmodernism? In S. Hassan, & I. Hassan (Eds.), Innovation/Renovation: New perspectives on the humanities (pp. 329-345). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Marcuse, H. (2002). One-dimensional man. London; New York: Routledge.
Matveeva, Y. (2010). Nonkonformisty v kollektsii Moskovskogo muzeya sovremennogo iskusstva (Nonconformists in the collection of the Moscow Museum of Modern Art, in Russian). Dialog iskusstv (Dialogue of Art, in Russian), 2, 30-33.
Melikyan, M. A. (2016). Filosofema sovershennogo cheloveka: istoriya i sovremennost' (Philosopheme of the perfect man: History and modernity, in Russian). Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (seri-ya “Gumanitarnyye nauki”) (Bulletin of the Ivanovo State University (series “Humanities”)), 2(16), 55-68.
Moroz, E. (2006). Evolyutsiya amerikanskoy istoriografii totalitarizma (1930-ye – konets 1980-kh gg.) (The evolution of American historiography of totalitarianism (1930s - late 1980s), in Russian). Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya (Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, in Russian), 5(1), 67-75.
Postoutenko, K. (Ed.). (2010). Totalitarian communication hierarchies, codes and messages. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839413937
Preda, C. (2017). Art and politics under modern dictatorships: A comparison of Chile and Romania. New York: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57270-3
Sers, P. (2004). Totalitarizm i avangard. V preddverii zapredel’nogo (Totalitarianism and avant-garde. In anticipation of the beyond, in Russian). Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.
Shokarev, S. (2017). Prezident Vladimir Putin ob “izvrashcheniyakh” nashey istorii (President Vladimir Putin about the “perversions” of our history, in Russian). Istoricheskaya ekspertiza (Historical Expertise, in Russian), 4(13), 142-144.
Siladi, A. (1994). Totalitarnyye kul'tury XX veka: religiya i rynok (The totalitarian countries of the XX century: Religion and market, in Russian). Obshchestvennyye nauki (Social Sciences, in Russian), 3, 151-166.
Smirnov, D. (2016). Simvolicheskaya politika: teoreticheskiye i metodologicheskiye aspekty (Symbolic politics: Theoretical and methodological aspects, in Russian). Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki (Bulletin of the Ivanovo State University, Series: Humanities, in Russian), 2(16), 5-16.
Ukhov A. (2017). Antitotalitarnyy smysl sovremennogo iskusstva (Antitotalitarian sense of contemporary art) In Ye.Vityuk, A.A.Maltseva, Y.S.Lundina (Eds.), Aktual'nyye problemy arkhitektury i dizayna: ma-terialy Vseros.nauch.konf.s mezhdu-nar.uch.(26-29 sentyabrya 2017g.) (Actual problems of architecture and design: materials of the All-Russian scientific conference international study (September 26-29, 2017)). Eka-terinburg: UrGAKhU. с.pp.453-458.
Warhol, A. (1975). The philosophy of Andy Warhol: From A to B and back again. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Yakovlev, E. (2011). Estetika: ucheboe posobie (Aesthetics: Tutorial, in Russian). Moscow: Knorus.
Zhdanov, A. (1976). From Andrei Zhdanov’s speech. In J. Bowlt (Ed.), Russian art of the avant-garde: Theory and criticism (pp. 292-294). London: Thames and Hudson.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Artem UKHOV, Eleonora SIMONYAN , Susanna MURADYAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
