The “Yin” and “Yang” Ancient Chinese Philosophy and its Practical Application to Body Treatment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.948

Keywords:

dialectical relationship, yin and yang theory, human body

Abstract

The birth of the theory of yin and yang is the result of a long process of reflecting and generalizing the practice of the Chinese people in ancient times. The original meaning of the theory of yin and yang was only an expression of the contrast between light and darkness. Its development has become a theory to explain the laws of nature, society and thought. In this article we will focus on clarifying the relationship of yin and yang theory on the human body through the relationships of the above, below, left and right, inside and outside, diagonal in the body position. To have a solid basis for this determination, we have conducted an evaluation at a health clinic from June 2005 to September 2022 with 2,402 people. The determination of the yin-yang relationship on the human body is conducted and recorded in a scientific and objective manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhadra, N. K. (2019). A human is a miniature of universe. IOSR Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 5, 56-73. doi: 10.9790/264X-0505015673

Chen, G.-M. (2008). Bian (Change): A perpetual discourse of I Ching. Intercultural Communication Studies, 17(4), 7-16.

Chen, M.-J. (2002). Transcending paradox: The Chinese ëmiddle wayí perspective. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3), 179-199. doi: 10.1023/A:1016235517735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016235517735

Chen, M.-J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 288-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492607312577

Chuang Tzu (2008). Basic writings. Hanoi: Culture Publishing House.

Cooper, J. C. (1990). Taoism: The way of the mystic. Wellingborough, UK: Aquarian Press.

Fang, T. (2003). A critique of Hofstedeís fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3), 347-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595803003003006

Fang, T. (2012). Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(01), 25-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x

Fletcher, R., & Fang, T. (2006). Assessing the impact of culture on relationship creation and network formation in emerging Asian markets. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 430-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610648138

Fung, Y.-L. e. B. D. B. (1948). A short history of Chinese philosophy. New York: MacMillan.

Fung, Y. L. (1952). A history of Chinese philosophy, Vol. 1. Translated and edited by Derk Bodde. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Unschuld, P., & Tessenow, H. (2011). Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen (1st ed.). University of California Press. Retrieved November 7, 2022 from https://www.perlego.com/book/551348/huang-di-nei-jing-su-wen-pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520948181

Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211

Lee, Y.-T. (2000). What is missing in Chinese-Western dialectical reasoning? American Psychologist, 55(9), 1065-1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.9.1065

Lee, Y.-T., Han, A.-G., Byron, T. K., & Fan, H.-X. (2008). Daoist Leadership: Theory and application. In C.-C. Chen, & Y.-T. Lee (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories and practices (pp. 83-107). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753763.005

Li, P. P. (1998). Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19(5), 829-861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900506

Li, P. P. (2008). Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 413-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00120.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00120.x

Li, P. P. (2011). The rigour-relevance balance for engaged scholarship: New frame and new agenda for trust research and beyond. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.550718

Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741

The Su Wen of the Huangdi Neijing (Inner classic of the yellow emperor) (n.d.). In Library of Congress. Retrieved November 10, 2022, from https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.wdl/wdl.3044

Vo, V. D. (2020). The theory of yin and yang and its significance for modern medicine. Hue University Publisher.

Wang, R. R. (2013). Understanding of yin yang. Religion Compass, 7(6), 214-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12047

Xinyan Xinyan (2013). Chinese dialectical thinking - the Yin Yang model. Philosophy Compass, 8(5), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12035

Xu, Y. (2002). The annotation and explication of discussions of the states (rev. ed.). (Compilation). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-25

How to Cite

VAN VO, D., & XUAN CAO, L. (2022). The “Yin” and “Yang” Ancient Chinese Philosophy and its Practical Application to Body Treatment. WISDOM, 24(4), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.948

Issue

Section

Articles