Genetic Determinism and the Problem of Moral Responsibility or is Morality Possible Without Freedom?

Authors

  • Anastasiya ABRAMOVA Plekhanov Russian University of Economics; Pirogov Russian Research Medical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-7503
  • Viktoria ABRAMOVA Pirogov Russian Research Medical University
  • Vladimir VETROV Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences
  • Oksana ALESHINA Tula State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.949

Keywords:

morality, ethics, evolutionary ethics, bioethics, determinism, moral responsibility, genetic reductionism, ethical principles, freedom and subordination

Abstract

The research devoted to freedom and responsibility proceeds only “inside” philosophical knowledge, and therefore there is a certain limitation. Only the synthesis of ideological positions will allow to open the veil of secrets of human actions. The article states that there are two clearly expressed positions regarding the causes of human behavior: the first is based on the theory of the synthetic evolution and emphasizes its biological (genetic) origin; the second rejects the biological conditionality of actions, because deterministic statements make people perceive their genome as an inescapable fate.

To agree with the lack of freedom means to accept the lack of moral responsibility. Without asserting the truth of the predestination of human behavior, the authors believe that such “philosophical perseverance” can not only lead scientists to a dead end, but also slow down the development of those studies that are associated with the introduction of new technologies, including medical ones based on discoveries in the field of genetics. Therefore, in order to “remove” ethical restrictions, the authors attempted to prove the possibility of freedom even within the framework of deterministic behavior by clarifying the essence of “subordination to the principle”, with which moral responsibility is associated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apresyan, R. G. (2001). Otvetstvenností. In E`tika. E`nciklopedicheskij slovar` (Responsibility in Ethics Encyclopedia, in Russian) (R. G. Apresyan, & A. A. Guseynov, Eds.). Moscow: Gardariki.

Bromberg, E. (2016). The evolution of ethics: An introduction to cybernetic ethics. United States: Dianic Publications.

de Melo-Martin, I (2005). Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: Bioethics and genetic determinism. Journal of Med Ethics, 31(9), 526-530. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.008417

Esposito, M. (2017, April). Expectation and futurity: The remarkable success of genetic determinism. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci, 62, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.01.001

Fixte, I. G. (2000). Faktyí soznaniya. Naznachenie cheloveka. Naukouchenie (Facts of Consciousness. Significance of Man. Scientific Study, in Russian). Minsk: Xarvest, Moscow: ACT.

Keller, E. F. (2000). The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039438

Hartman, N. (2002). Etika (Ethics, in Russian). Moscow: Vladimir Dal`.

Jirtle, R. L., & Skinner, M. K. (2007). Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev Genet, 8(4), 253-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2045

Jonas, G. (2004). Princip otvetstvennosti. Opy`t etiki dlya texnologicheskoj civilizacii (Principle of Responsibility. Ethics Experience for Technological Civilization, in Russian). Moscow: Ajris-press.

Kay, L. E. (1993). The molecular vision of life. Oxford University Press, NY.

Lazarus, R. S., & Lazarus, B. N. (1994). Passion and reason making sense of our emotions. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mcafee, K. (2003). Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum, 34, 203-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00089-1

Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (2004). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6769

Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information. Developmental systems and evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220mm5

Sabatello, M, & Juengst, E. (2019, May). Genomic essentialism: Its provenance and trajectory as an anticipatory ethical concern. In Hastings Cent Rep., 49(Suppl 1), 10-18. doi: 10.1002/hast.1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1012

Sheler, M. (1994). Ordo amoris. Moscow: ìGnozisî Publication.

Sartre, J. P. (1989). E`kzistencializm ñ e`to gumanizm (Existentialism is Humanism, in Russian). Moscow: Politizdat.

Van Regenmortel, M. H. (2004). Reductionism and complexity in molecular biology. Scientists now have the tools to unravel biological and overcome the limitations of reductionism. EMBO Rep., 5(11), 1016-1020. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400284

Vasiliev, V. V. (2016). V zashhitu klassicheskogo kompatibilizma (In Defense of Classical Compatibilism, in Russian). Voprosy filosofii (Questions of Philosophy, in Russian), 2, 64-76.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-25

How to Cite

ABRAMOVA, A., ABRAMOVA, V., VETROV, V., & ALESHINA, O. (2022). Genetic Determinism and the Problem of Moral Responsibility or is Morality Possible Without Freedom?. WISDOM, 24(4), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.949

Issue

Section

Articles