Trinitary Approach as a Methodological Principle of Transcendental Psychology


  • Gor YESAYAN Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University, Yerevan, Armenia
  • Ruben NAGHDYAN International Scientific Educational Centre, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia



philosophy of psychology, philosophy, transcendental psychology, metaphysica, trinitarity, methodology of psychology


At present, according to many psychologists, the methodology of psychology is in a state of crisis, the reasons for which are quite deep and go beyond psychology. It is becoming increasingly clear that psychology and the methodology of psychology, in particular, cannot do without turning to philosophy when tackling its issues, hoping that it is the philosophical analysis of the universal laws of nature that will allow the methodology of psychology to be built on a more fundamental basis.

This article is one of such attempts that shows the possibility of applying a trinitarian approach to solve some problems in psychology.

To demonstrate the universality of the manifestations of the principle of trinity in nature and cognition, the article, as far as its scopes allow to, provides examples of the manifestation of triads in philosophy, physics, mathematics, anatomy, physiology, and in the psychological concepts of B. Skinner, S. Freud, C. G. Jung, E. Bern and M. Erickson.

The possibility of using trinitarity as a methodological principle of psychology is shown in the example of the analysis of the mechanisms of the generative process of perception studied in transcendental psychology.


Download data is not yet available.


Akopov, G. A. (2014). Sozertsaniye v kategorialnoy sisteme sovremennoy psikhologii (Contempla-tion in the categorical system of modern psychology, in Russian). Samara: VEK#21 Pub-lishing House.

Barantsev, R. G. (2005). Stanovleniye trinitarnogo myshleniya (The formation of trinitarian thoght, in Russian). Izhevsk: RKHD Publishing House.

Berne, E. (2009). Transaktsionnyy analiz v psikhoterapii (Transactional analysis in psychotherapy, in Russian). Moscow: Eksmo Publishing House.

Bloom, F., Lazerson, A., & Hofstadter, L. (1998). Mozg. razum i povedeniye (Brain, mind, and be-havior, in Russian). Moscow: ìMirî Publishing House.

Carlson, D. (2007). Commentary on Hegelís Science of Logic. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI:

Erickson, M. (1980). The nature of hypnosis and suggestion (Collected papers of Milton H. Erick-son). (Vol. 1). New York: Publisher Irvington Pub

Freud, S. (2000). Tolkovaniye snovideniy (The interpretation of dreams, in Russian). Minsk: ìPopurriî Publishing Hous.

Freud, S. (2014). Ya i Ono (The Ego and the Id, in Russian). Moscow: ìAzbuka-klassikaî Publish-ing Hous.

Ginzburg, M., & Yakovleva, E. (2008). Eriksonovskiy gipnoz: sistematicheskiy kurs (Ericksonian hypnosis: A systematic course, in Russian). Moscow: Psychological and Social Institute Publication.

Hegel, G. (1929). Obyektivnaya logika (The objective logic, in Russian). In Nauka logiki (The sci-ence of logic, in Russian) (First part. Book one). Moscow: Publisher Institut krasnoy professury.

Hegel, G. (1970). Nauka logiki (The science of logic, in Russian). (Vol. 1). Moscow: ìMyslî Pub-lishing House.

Hjelle, L., & Ziegler, D. (2009). Teorii lichnosti (Personality theories, in Russian). (3rd ed.). Saint Petersburg: ìPeterî Publishing House.

Ilyin, E. (2001). Emotsii i chuvstva (Emotions and feelings, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: ìPeterî Publishing House.

Izard, C. (2006). Psikhologiya emotsiy (The psychology of emotions, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: ìPeterî Publishing House.

Jung, C. K. (2008). Struktura i dinamika psikhicheskogo (The structure and dynamics of the psyche, in Russsian). Moscow: ìCogito-Tsentrî Publishing Hous.

Magnitov, S., & Tatur V. (2003). Trinitarizm kak nauchnaya doktrina noosfery (Trinitarian as a sci-entific doctrine of the noosphere, in Russian). Minsk. Slavyanskoye Veche, 2, 202-205.

Mirakyan, A. I. (1999). Kontury transtsendentalnoy psikhologii (Outlines of transcendental psy-chology, in Russian). (Book 1.). Moscow: Publisher IPRAS.

Mirakyan, A. I. (2004). Kontury transtsendentalnoy psikhologii (Outlines of transcendental psy-chology, in Russian). (Book 2.). Moscow: Publisher IPRAS.

Mirakyan, A. I. (2010). Osnovaniya transtsendentalnoy psikhologii vospriyatii (Foundations of transcendental psychology of perception, in Russian). In A. I. Mirakyan i sovremennaya psikhologiya vospriyatiya (A. I. Mirakyan and modern psychology of perception, in Rus-sian) (pp. 61-89). Moscow: Publisher ìPsychological Instituteî RAE.

Mirakyan, A. I. (1992). Printsipy porozhdayushchego protsessa vospriyatiya (Principles of the gen-erating process of perception, in Russian). Moscow: Publisher ìPsychological Instituteî RAE.

Naghdyan, R. M. (2018). Printsip trinitarnosti v transtsendentalnoy psikhologii (The trinitarian principle in transcendental psychology, in Russian). Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik (Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, in Russian), 6(105), 229-240.

Naghdyan, R. M. (2022). V poiskakh ontologii psikhicheskogo. Transtsendentalnaya psikhologiya. Metafizika. Fizika (In search of an ontology of the psychic. Transcendental psychology. Metaphysics. Physics, in Russian). Yerevan: Author's Publisher.

Naghdyan, R. M. (2017). Zagadki psikhiki: Transtsendentalnaya psikhologiya i metafizika (The mystery of the psyche: Transcendental psychology and metaphysics, in Russian). Yerevan, Lusabats Publishing Hous.

Panov, V. I. (2014). Ekopsikhologiya: Paradigmalnyy poisk (Ecopsychology: In search of a para-digm, in Russian). Msscow, Saint Petersburg, Psychological Institute RAE: Nestor-Istoriya Publishing Hous.

Porshnev, B. F. (1974). O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii (On the beginning of human history, in Russian). Moscow: ìMislî Publishing Hous.

Porshnev, B. F. (1979). Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i istoriya (Social psychology and history, in Rus-sian). Moscow: ìNaukaî Publishing Hous.

Raushenbakh, B. V. (2000). Triyedinstvo pronizyvayet prirodu (Trinity permeates nature, in Rus-sian). Moscow: ìVeraî Publishing Hous.

Selye, H. (1983). Stres arants distres (Stress without distress, in Armenian). Yerevan: ìHayastanî Publishing Hous.

Skinner, B. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Published Alfred A. Knopf.

Vladimirov, Yu. S. (2012). Printsip trinitarnosti v fizike. filosofii i religii (The principle of trinity in physics, philosophy and religion, in Russian). Metafizika (Metaphysics) Scientific Journal, 1(3), 121-139.

Yesayan, G. S. (2018). Osobennosti printsipa trinitarnosti v transtsendentalnoy psikhologii (Specif-ics of the trinitarian principle in transcendental psychology, in Russian). In Materials of the National Scientific and Practical Internet Conference with International Participation (pp. 25-29). Yaroslavl: ìYaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinskyî

Yesayan, G. S. (2017). Printsipy transtsendentalnoy psikhologii v kontekste trinitarnogo myshleniya (The principles transcendental psychology in the context of trinitarian thought, in Russian). Metodologiya sovremennoy psikhologii (Methodology of modern psychology, in Russian), Collection of articles, 7, 94-110. Yaroslavl: YAGPU, RAS, IAPS.




How to Cite

YESAYAN, G., & NAGHDYAN, R. (2023). Trinitary Approach as a Methodological Principle of Transcendental Psychology. WISDOM, 25(1), 31–41.