Formation of Thought Style in Organizing the Educational Process and Training of Medical Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v26i2.998Keywords:
science, philosophy of science, philosophy of education, science education, paradigm, thought style, thought collective, gestaltAbstract
The purpose of the paper is to analyze thought style as a foundation for understanding the operation of scientific education. The theoretical and methodological basis of the work is formed by the concepts of development of science through paradigm shifts, philosophical analysis of thought style, and heuristic capabilities of philosophical comparativism in combination with the hermeneutic method of text interpretation as applied to the sociocultural paradigm of science. The training of a specialist in any scientific field is realized in the framework of the given thought style because the style directs the perception and determines the nature of work with the empirical material and the form of solving problematic situations. Training provides not only an increment of specialized knowledge but also a projection of a general cultural communicative orientation. Thus, the construction of how one should perceive, understand, evaluate, and apply can be viewed as the construction and implementation of an appropriate educational strategy. The concept of thought styles is one of the most successful methodologies for explaining not only the movement of science but also the implementation of education in science.
Downloads
References
Andersen, H. (2001). On Kuhn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Beatty, J. E., Leigh, J. S. A., & Lund Dean, K. (2020). Republication of: Philosophy rediscovered: Exploring the connections between teaching philosophies, educational philosophies, and philosophy. Journal of Management Education, 44(5), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920912915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920912915
Ciesielska, M., & Jarnicki, P. (2021). Ludwik Fleck ñ Mikrobiolog i filozof (Ludwik Fleck - Microbiologist and philosopher, in Polish). Warsaw: Publishing House of the Warsaw University of Technology.
Cohen, R. S., & Schnelle, T. (1986). Cognition and fact. Materials on Ludwik Fleck. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4498-5
Fleck, L. (1999). Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: Vvedenie v teoriiu stilia myshleniia i myslitelnogo kollektiva (Genesis and development of a scientific fact: Introduction to the theory of thought style and thought collective, in Russian). Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noy knigi.
Flecksikon. (n.d.). Fleck Glossar Version 0.2/Stand4.9.06/. Retrieved February 25, 2023, from http://ludwik-fleck-kreis.org/uploadfiles/documents/1909_015340_Flecksikon
Garcia Sanchez, C. (2021). Ludwik Fleck: La teoria de los estilos de pensamiento y de los colectivos de pensamiento (Ludwik Fleck: The theory of thinking stylesand thinking collective, in Spanish). Revista Colombiana De Filosofia De La Ciencia, 20(41), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v20i41.1985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v20i41.1985
Haynes, B. (2020). Can creativity be taught? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 34-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1594194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1594194
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1989). Von Wissenschaftsentwicklung und Wirklichkeit in der Teorie Thomas S. Kuhns (Of science development and reality in Thomas S. Kuhnís theory, in German). Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie, 37(6), 510-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/dzph.1989.37.6.508
Khadzharov, M. Kh. (2010). Stilí nauchnogo myshleniya v sotsiologii znaniya (Style of scientific thinking in the sociology of knowledge, in Russian). In S. F. Martynovich (Ed.), Filosofiya nauki v informatsionnom obshchestve: Aktualínye problemy. Materialy Pervoi mezhvuzovskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Philosophy of science in the information society: Actual problems. Proceedings of the First interuniversity scientific conference, in Russian) (pp. 87-89). Saratov: Izdatel'stvo ìSaratovskiy istochnikî.
Koyre, A. (1939). Etudes Galileennes. Paris: Hermann & Cie.
Kuhn, T. (1999). Predislovie k angliiskomu perevodu (Preface to the English translation, in Russian). In L. Fleck, Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: Vvedenie v teoriyu stilya myshleniya i myslitelínogo kollektiva (Genesis and development of a scientific fact: Introduction to the theory of thought style and thought collective, in Russian) (pp. 20-21). Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noy knigi.
Kuhn, Th. S. (1963). The functions of dogma in scientific research. In A. C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific change: Symposium on the history of science, University of Oxford, 9-15 July 1961 (pp. 347-369). London: Heinemann.
Kuhn, Th. S. (2003). Struktura nauchnykh revoliutsii (The structure of scientific revolutions, in Russian). Moscow: OOO ìIzdatelístvo ACTî.
Lorenzano, C. (2004). Los ancestros de Thomas Kuhn (Homenaje a Ludwik Fleck) (The ancestors of Thomas Kuhn (Homage to Ludwik Fleck), in Spanish). In R. A. Martins, L. A. C. P. Martins, C. C. Silva, & J. M. H. Ferreira (Eds.), Filosofia e historia da ciencia no Cone Sul: 3oEncontro (pp. 91-101). Campinas: AFHIC.
Martins, A. F. P. (2020a). A obra aberta de Ludwik Fleck (Ludwik Fleckís open work, in Portuguese). Brazilian Journal of Research in Science Education, 20, 1197-1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u11971226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u11971226
Martins, A. F. P. (2020b). Terraplanismo, Ludwik Fleck e o mito de Prometeu (Flat-Earthism, Ludwik Fleck and the Myth of Prometheus, in Portuguese). Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Fisica Journal, 37(3), 1193-1216. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2020v37n3p1193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2020v37n3p1193
Meyerson, E. (1930). Identitat und Wirklichkeit (Identity and reality, in German). Leipzig: Akad. Verlagsgesellschaft.
Olesko, K. M. (2020). Ludwik Fleck, Alfred Schutz, and trust in science: The public responsibility of science education in challenging times. HoST - Journal of History of Science and Technology, 14(2), 50-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/host-2020-0014
Parhusip, A. (2020). Modern educational philosophies. In Proceedings of the 1st International conference on education, society, economy, humanity and environment (ICESHE 2019) (pp. 22-24). Atlantis Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200311.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200311.005
Pena-Guzman, D. M. (2020). French historical epistemology: Discourse, concepts, and the norms of rationality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 79, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.01.006
Peters, M., Neilson, D., & Jackson, L. (2022). Post-marxism, humanism and (post)structuralism: Educational philosophy and theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(14), 2331-2340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1824783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1824783
Pozdniakov, A. A. (2014). Stilí nauchnogo myshleniya: Epokhalnaya ili distsiplinarnaya kontseptsiya? (A style of scientific thinking: An epochal or a disciplinary concept?, in Russian). Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 39(1), 191-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201439117
Pruzhinin, B. I. (2011). ìStilí nauchnogo myshleniyaî v otechestvennoi filosofii nauki (ìStyle of scientific thoughtî in Russian philosophy of science, in Russian). Problems of Philosophy, 6, 64-74.
Sak, J., & Pawlikowski, J. (2012). Medicine and thought-styles: On the 50th anniversary of the death of Ludwik Fleck (1896-1961). The Israel Medical Association Journal, 14(4), 214-218.
Sankey, H. (2021). Realism and the epistemic objectivity of science. Kriterion ñ Journal of Philosophy, 35(1), 5-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/krt-2021-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/krt-2021-0002
Shepetiak, O., & Shepetiak, O. (2020). Ludwik Fleck: A philosopher forgotten in Ukraine. Idei, 1(15)-2(16), 18-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34017/1313-9703-2020-1(15)-2(16)-18-28
Solska, E. (2015). Ludwik Fleck: A message to start a new discourse. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 28(1), 60-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cipms-2015-0045
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Elena Shadrina, Zakir KULIEV, Elena SCHASTLIVTSEVA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
