Formation of Thought Style in Organizing the Educational Process and Training of Medical Students


  • Elena SHADRINA I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
  • Zakir KULIEV I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
  • Elena SCHASTLIVTSEVA Vyatka State University (VyatSU), Kirov



science, philosophy of science, philosophy of education, science education, paradigm, thought style, thought collective, gestalt


The purpose of the paper is to analyze thought style as a foundation for understanding the operation of scientific education. The theoretical and methodological basis of the work is formed by the concepts of development of science through paradigm shifts, philosophical analysis of thought style, and heuristic capabilities of philosophical comparativism in combination with the hermeneutic method of text interpretation as applied to the sociocultural paradigm of science. The training of a specialist in any scientific field is realized in the framework of the given thought style because the style directs the perception and determines the nature of work with the empirical material and the form of solving problematic situations. Training provides not only an increment of specialized knowledge but also a projection of a general cultural communicative orientation. Thus, the construction of how one should perceive, understand, evaluate, and apply can be viewed as the construction and implementation of an appropriate educational strategy. The concept of thought styles is one of the most successful methodologies for explaining not only the movement of science but also the implementation of education in science.


Download data is not yet available.


Andersen, H. (2001). On Kuhn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Beatty, J. E., Leigh, J. S. A., & Lund Dean, K. (2020). Republication of: Philosophy rediscovered: Exploring the connections between teaching philosophies, educational philosophies, and philosophy. Journal of Management Education, 44(5), 543-559. DOI:

Ciesielska, M., & Jarnicki, P. (2021). Ludwik Fleck ñ Mikrobiolog i filozof (Ludwik Fleck - Microbiologist and philosopher, in Polish). Warsaw: Publishing House of the Warsaw University of Technology.

Cohen, R. S., & Schnelle, T. (1986). Cognition and fact. Materials on Ludwik Fleck. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI:

Fleck, L. (1999). Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: Vvedenie v teoriiu stilia myshleniia i myslitelnogo kollektiva (Genesis and development of a scientific fact: Introduction to the theory of thought style and thought collective, in Russian). Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noy knigi.

Flecksikon. (n.d.). Fleck Glossar Version 0.2/Stand4.9.06/. Retrieved February 25, 2023, from

Garcia Sanchez, C. (2021). Ludwik Fleck: La teoria de los estilos de pensamiento y de los colectivos de pensamiento (Ludwik Fleck: The theory of thinking stylesand thinking collective, in Spanish). Revista Colombiana De Filosofia De La Ciencia, 20(41), 147-167. DOI:

Haynes, B. (2020). Can creativity be taught? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 34-44. DOI:

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1989). Von Wissenschaftsentwicklung und Wirklichkeit in der Teorie Thomas S. Kuhns (Of science development and reality in Thomas S. Kuhnís theory, in German). Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie, 37(6), 510-511. DOI:

Khadzharov, M. Kh. (2010). Stilí nauchnogo myshleniya v sotsiologii znaniya (Style of scientific thinking in the sociology of knowledge, in Russian). In S. F. Martynovich (Ed.), Filosofiya nauki v informatsionnom obshchestve: Aktualínye problemy. Materialy Pervoi mezhvuzovskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Philosophy of science in the information society: Actual problems. Proceedings of the First interuniversity scientific conference, in Russian) (pp. 87-89). Saratov: Izdatel'stvo ìSaratovskiy istochnikî.

Koyre, A. (1939). Etudes Galileennes. Paris: Hermann & Cie.

Kuhn, T. (1999). Predislovie k angliiskomu perevodu (Preface to the English translation, in Russian). In L. Fleck, Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: Vvedenie v teoriyu stilya myshleniya i myslitelínogo kollektiva (Genesis and development of a scientific fact: Introduction to the theory of thought style and thought collective, in Russian) (pp. 20-21). Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noy knigi.

Kuhn, Th. S. (1963). The functions of dogma in scientific research. In A. C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific change: Symposium on the history of science, University of Oxford, 9-15 July 1961 (pp. 347-369). London: Heinemann.

Kuhn, Th. S. (2003). Struktura nauchnykh revoliutsii (The structure of scientific revolutions, in Russian). Moscow: OOO ìIzdatelístvo ACTî.

Lorenzano, C. (2004). Los ancestros de Thomas Kuhn (Homenaje a Ludwik Fleck) (The ancestors of Thomas Kuhn (Homage to Ludwik Fleck), in Spanish). In R. A. Martins, L. A. C. P. Martins, C. C. Silva, & J. M. H. Ferreira (Eds.), Filosofia e historia da ciencia no Cone Sul: 3oEncontro (pp. 91-101). Campinas: AFHIC.

Martins, A. F. P. (2020a). A obra aberta de Ludwik Fleck (Ludwik Fleckís open work, in Portuguese). Brazilian Journal of Research in Science Education, 20, 1197-1226. DOI:

Martins, A. F. P. (2020b). Terraplanismo, Ludwik Fleck e o mito de Prometeu (Flat-Earthism, Ludwik Fleck and the Myth of Prometheus, in Portuguese). Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Fisica Journal, 37(3), 1193-1216. DOI:

Meyerson, E. (1930). Identitat und Wirklichkeit (Identity and reality, in German). Leipzig: Akad. Verlagsgesellschaft.

Olesko, K. M. (2020). Ludwik Fleck, Alfred Schutz, and trust in science: The public responsibility of science education in challenging times. HoST - Journal of History of Science and Technology, 14(2), 50-72. DOI:

Parhusip, A. (2020). Modern educational philosophies. In Proceedings of the 1st International conference on education, society, economy, humanity and environment (ICESHE 2019) (pp. 22-24). Atlantis Press. DOI:

Pena-Guzman, D. M. (2020). French historical epistemology: Discourse, concepts, and the norms of rationality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 79, 68-76. DOI:

Peters, M., Neilson, D., & Jackson, L. (2022). Post-marxism, humanism and (post)structuralism: Educational philosophy and theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(14), 2331-2340. DOI:

Pozdniakov, A. A. (2014). Stilí nauchnogo myshleniya: Epokhalnaya ili distsiplinarnaya kontseptsiya? (A style of scientific thinking: An epochal or a disciplinary concept?, in Russian). Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 39(1), 191-210. DOI:

Pruzhinin, B. I. (2011). ìStilí nauchnogo myshleniyaî v otechestvennoi filosofii nauki (ìStyle of scientific thoughtî in Russian philosophy of science, in Russian). Problems of Philosophy, 6, 64-74.

Sak, J., & Pawlikowski, J. (2012). Medicine and thought-styles: On the 50th anniversary of the death of Ludwik Fleck (1896-1961). The Israel Medical Association Journal, 14(4), 214-218.

Sankey, H. (2021). Realism and the epistemic objectivity of science. Kriterion ñ Journal of Philosophy, 35(1), 5-20. DOI:

Shepetiak, O., & Shepetiak, O. (2020). Ludwik Fleck: A philosopher forgotten in Ukraine. Idei, 1(15)-2(16), 18-28. DOI:

Solska, E. (2015). Ludwik Fleck: A message to start a new discourse. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 28(1), 60-62. DOI:

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. New York: John Wiley and Sons.




How to Cite

SHADRINA, E., KULIEV, Z., & SCHASTLIVTSEVA, E. (2023). Formation of Thought Style in Organizing the Educational Process and Training of Medical Students. WISDOM, 26(2), 84–93.




Most read articles by the same author(s)