Three Philosophical Pillars of the 2022 Armenian Constitutional Revision: Empowerment of Public Discourse, Theory of Justice, and Environmental Ethics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1053

Keywords:

transition from semi-presidential governance into parliamentary democracy, constitution making, constitutional change, empowerment of political discourse, political shared culture, recognition of social, economic, and cultural rights, theory of justice of John Rawls, environmental ethics

Abstract

The first chapter of this article presents the consequences of the 2015 constitutional change and the specifics of their implementation before and after the 2018 Velvet Revolution. The second chapter makes substantive considerations on the constitutional reforms launched in 2022 through the prism of the rule of law and the improvement of public discourse. It addresses the procedural democracy developed by modern political philosophy and focuses on legal mechanisms in an attempt to improve the political discourse promoted by Jurgen Habermas. It also discusses the theory of Justice developed by John Rawls and provides reflections on Environmental Ethics stemming from the philosophy of responsibility of Hans Jonas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Billier, J-C (2010). Introduction ‡ líethique. PUF.

Carranza, R. (2019). Paths to transitional justice in Armenia. International Center for Transitional Justice. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.ictj.org/news/paths-transitional-justice-armenia#:~:text=In%20designing%20transitional%20justice%20in%20Armenia%2C%20policymakers%2C%20civil,hope%20for%20a%20better%20future%20required%20a%20revolution

Carranza, R., & Abrahamyan, M. (2021). Now is the time to make transitional justice possible in Armenia. International Center for Transitional Justice. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.ictj.org/news/now-time-make-transitional-justice-possible-armenia

Chenwi, L. (2013). Unpacking ìprogressive realisation, its relation to resources, minimum core and reasonableness, and some methodological considerations for assessing compliance. De Jure, 46/3.

Concept of the reforms necessary to restore the Republic of Armenia (Roadmap) (2018, December 29). Helsinki Citizensí Assembly-Vanadzor. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://hcav.am/chanaparhayin-qartez/?fbclid=IwAR2dLKgfw-tpBqDqFfWIXLUWVdGA-SVXxfDEMbxOGuUCIPawwmfOy9GR74w

DuffrËne, M.-P. C. (2020). La reconnaissance du prÈjudice spÈcifiques en cas de catastrophe technologique. Du prÈjudice Ècologique au prÈjudice sanitaire, Revue juridique de líenvironnement. HS20 n spÈcial.

Ewald, F. (2008). Philosophie du principe de prÈcaution. In Francois Ewald, Christian Gollier, Nicolas de Sadeleer, Le principe de prÈcaution, Que suis-je, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.ewald.2008.01

Foster, K. (2019, May 29). Armeniaís Velvet Revolution: Lessons from the Caucasus. Harvard International Review. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://hir.harvard.edu/armenias-velvet-revolution/

Habermas, J. (1987). ThÈorie de líagir communicationnel. Fayard

Habermas, J. (1997). Droit et dÈmocratie, Entre fait et normes. Gaillard.

Hovhannisyan, G. (2020). Yndhanur iravagitutyun ev iravabanakan metodabanutyun (General Theory of Law and Legal Methodology, in Armenian). Public Diplomacy.

International IDEA, Non-Executive Presidents in Parliamentary Democracies, International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 6 (2017). Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/non-executive-presidents-parliamentary-democracies

International IDEA, Opposition and Legislative Minorities: Constitutional Roles, Rights and Recognition. International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 22 (2021). Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/opposition-and-legislative-minorities-constitutional-roles-rights-recognition.pdf

Jonas, H. (2013). Principe de responsabilitÈ. Paris: Flammaron.

Jouanjan, O. (2016). Constitutionnalisme, justice, justice constitutionnelle et reprÈsentation. In Le rÈgime reprÈsentatif ‡ líÈpreuve de la justice constitutionnelle, Actes du colloque organisÈ les 9 et 10 octobre 2014 par líInstitut Maurice Hauriou UniversitÈ Toulouse 1-Capitole sous la direction de StÈphan MOUTON, LGDJ.

Khalatyan, A. (2023). HH Khorhrdarani irava-qaghaqakan kargavijaki evolyucian ev amrapndman ughinery, vorosh nkatatumner (The Evolution of Legal and Political Status of the Parliament and the Ways to Strengthen It, in Armenian). Armenian Institute of International and Security Affairs. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://regst.wordpress.com/2022/12/01/amrapndman_uxinery/?fbclid=IwAR0TPMGF16T2vwhQeBSXMPEllDKNyGedp5yr948-qQpt0FN2LCGCPulvCGs

le Divellec, A. (2016). Le juge constitutionnel et les relations entre les parlements et le pouvoir exÈcutif in: StÈphan MOUTON. Le rÈgime reprÈsentatif ‡ líÈpreuve de la justice constitutionnelle, Actes du colloque organisÈ les 9 et 10 octobre 2014 par líInstitut Maurice Hauriou UniversitÈ Toulouse 1-Capitole. LGDJ.

Lord Sumption (2020). Lecture, British politics after Brexit: Reflections on the last three years and the next fifty. Oxford Martin School. University of Oxford. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVlApCfy-So&ab_channel=OxfordMartinSchool

Mommier, E. (2022). La dÈmocratie environnementale, prÈserver notre part de nature. PUF.

Ordukhanyan, E. (2022). Joghovrdavarakan ancumy Hayastanum (gnahatum QMKhCh metodov) (Democratic Transition of Political Regime in Armenia (Assessment by DMPC method), in Armenian). National Academy of Sciences of Armenia. Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law.

Rawls, J. (1987). ThÈorie de la justice. Paris: Le Seuil.

Russ, J., & Leguil, C. (2020). La pensÈe Èthique contemporaine, Que sais-je? (5th ed.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.russ.2020.01

Schmitt, C. (1988). Parlementarisme et dÈmocratie. Paris: Le Seuil.

Social and Economic Rights, International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 9 (2017). International IDEA. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/social-and-economic-rights-primer.pdf

Thibierge, C. (2004). Avenir de la responsabilitÈ, resposanbilitÈ de líavenir. D. 577.

USA Helsinki Commission, Revolution in Armenia? (2018). The Power and Prospects of the Protest Movement in Briefing of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (known As USA Helsinki Commission) of 26 April 2018. 115th Congress, 2nd Session, CSCE. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.csce.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/RevolutioninArmenia.pdf

Viala, A. (2014). Relativisme ou substantialisme: Quelle philosophie du droit pour la dÈmocratie in La dÈmocratie: mais quíen disent les juristes? Forces et faiblesses de la rationalitÈ juridique, Actes du colloque organisÈ les 24 et 25 mai 2012 a la facultÈ díÈtudes et de recherches comparatives constitutionnelles et politiques (CERCOP), sous la direction de Alexandre VIALA,†LGDJ.

Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Strategy, and Financing Plan for 2018-2030 (2018). Annex to the Governmental Protocol Decision of 15th of March.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

HAKOBYAN, D. (2023). Three Philosophical Pillars of the 2022 Armenian Constitutional Revision: Empowerment of Public Discourse, Theory of Justice, and Environmental Ethics. WISDOM, 28(4), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v28i4.1053

Issue

Section

Philosophy of Law