Socio-Adaptive Thinking of Searching for an Architectural Connection to Improve the Lives of Students with Special Physical Needs as a Special Kind of Philosophical Communication

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v18i2.491

Keywords:

socio-adaptive, physical needs, philosophical communication, architectural environment, persons with disabilities

Abstract

An analysis of the spiritual situation in the modern, in particular the Western, world prompts the idea that a person's place in it is becoming increasingly uncertain and contradictory. This is especially evident in the context of various conflicts arising among people with disabilities due to infrastructure problems in educational institutions. It is obvious that disabled people and various categories of mentally and physically weakened people are a very significant part of our society, for which accessible and comfortable conditions of life and rehabilitation should be created. This requirement should be considered among the fundamental, and it should apply to many significant objects of the social infrastructure of modern cities, including their higher educational institutions. The major purpose of this article is to determine the ways of adapting the architectural environment of higher education institutions to the needs of persons with disabilities. The object of the research is the buildings and structures of higher education institutions. To achieve the goal of our research we have used a IDEF0 model in the context of achieving social adaptation and improving communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Galyna HNAT, National University "Lviv Polytechnic"

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Architecture) is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Architectural Design and Engineering National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine. Her areas of interest include philosophy, socio-adaptive, physical needs, philosophical communication, architectural environment, persons with disabilities. HNAT is the author of 70 scientific articles.

Ihor HNES, National University "Lviv Polytechnic"

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Architecture) is a Professor at the Department of Architectural Design and Engineering National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine. His areas of interest include philosophy, socio-adaptive, physical needs, philosophical communication, architectural environment, persons with disabilities. Ihor HNES is the author of 50 scientific articles.

Liubov SOLOVII, Lviv Polytechnic National University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Architecture) is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Architectural Design and Engineering National University “Lviv Polytechnic”. Her areas of interest include philosophy, socio-adaptive, physical needs, philosophical communication, architectural environment, persons with disabilities. Liubov SOLOVII is the author of 40 scientific articles.

Lyudmyla HNES, Lviv National Agrarian University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Architecture) is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Architecture and Planning of rural settlements Lviv National Agrarian University, Dublyany, Ukraine. Her areas of interest include philosophy, socio-adaptive, physical needs, philosophical communication, architectural environment, persons with disabilities. Lyudmyla HNES is the author of 40 scientific articles.

Volodymyr BABYAK, Lviv Polytechnic National University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Architecture) is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Architectural Design and Engineering National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine. His areas of interest include philosophy, socio-adaptive, physical needs, philosophical communication, architectural environment, persons with disabilities. Volodymyr BABYAK is the author of 30 scientific articles.

References

Alrashidi, A. M. (2010). University education and students’ perceptions of physical disabilities at Kuwait University. Kuwait: ProQuest Publishing.

Azeri Gorji, A. A. & Shirzad Nazarloo, Z. (2018). Hashmandamneri iravunk’neri dirk’y k’aghak’ayin iravunk’i volortum (The position of rights of the disabled in the field of urban law, in Persian). Journal of Strategic Studies in Public Policy, 8(26), 137-163.

Boyer, E. L., & Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building community: A new future for architecture education and practice: A special report. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space: Critique and classification, part one: Critique. Journal of Urban Design,15(1), 123-148.

Francis, L. (2018). Understanding disability civil rights non-categorically: The Minority Body and the Americans with disabilities act. Philosophical Studies,175(5), 1135-1149.

Froehilich, D. E., Beausaert, S. A. J., & Segers, M. (2015). Great expectations: The relationship between future time perspective, learning from others, and employability. Vocation and Learning, 8, 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9131-6

Hallgrimsdottir, B., Wennberg, H., Svensson, H., & Ståhl, A. (2016). Implementation of accessibility policy in municipal transport planning-progression and regression in Sweden between 2004 and 2014. Transport Policy, 49, 196-205.

Kamp, A. (2016). Engineering education in the rapidly changing World. Rethinking the vision for higher engineering education. Delft: TU Delft / 4TU Centre for Engineering Education.

Kurath, M. (2015). Architecture as a science: Boundary work and the demarcation of design knowledge from research. Science & Technology Studies, 28, 81-100.

Lisy, K., Campbell, J. M., Tufanaru, C., Moola, S., & Lockwood, C. (2018). The prevalence of disability among people with cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, and/or diabetes: A systematic review. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare,16(3), 154-166.

Milner, P., & Kelly, B. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability & Society, 24, 47-62

Mitra, S., & Sambamoorhi, U. (2006). Employment of persons with disabilities: Evidence from the National Sample Survey. Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 4022-4026.

Rijst, R., Baggen, Y., & Sjoer, E. (2018). University teachers’ learning paths during technological innovation in education. International Journal for Academic Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2018.1500916

Rosano, A., Mancini, F., & Solipaca, A. (2009). Poverty in people with disabilities: Indicators from the capability approach. Social Indicators Research, 94, 75-82.

Salmela, J. (2019). Research & Development project concerning the inclusion of students with special needs. Malmö: ProQuest Publishing.

Segrest, R. (1997). The architecture of architectural education. Assemblage, 33, 76-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/3171382

Shahraki, A. A., Ebrahimzadeh, I., & Kashefidoost, D. (2016). Distributional planning of educational places in developing cities with case studies. Habitat International, 51, 168-177.

Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2009). The public and its university: Beyond learning for civic employability? European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 204-217.

Steen, M., Manschot, M. A. J., & de Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53-60.

Townsend, P. (1985). A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: A rejoinder to Professor Amartya Sen. Oxford Economic Papers, 37, 659-668.

Van Dooren, E., Boshuizen, E., van Merriënboer, J., Asselbergs, T., & van Dorst, M. (2014). Making explicit in design education: Generic elements in the design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 53-71.

Vermeersch, P., & Heylighen, A. (2012). Blindness and multi-sensoriality in architecture. The case of Carlos Mourão Pereira. In R. Hayes, & V. Ebbert (Eds), The place of research, the research of place. ARCC/EAAE 2010 international conference on architectural research (pp. 393-400) Washington DC: Architectural Research Centers Consortium (ARCC).

White, H., Saran, A., & Kuper, H. (2018). Evidence and Gap Map of studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions for people with disabilities’. New Delhi and London: Campbell Collaboration and International Centre for Evidence and Disability.

Wirth, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Fuenschilling, L., & Coenen, L. (2018). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainable transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895

Downloads

Published

2021-06-25

How to Cite

HNAT, G., HNES, I., SOLOVII, L., HNES, L., & BABYAK, V. (2021). Socio-Adaptive Thinking of Searching for an Architectural Connection to Improve the Lives of Students with Special Physical Needs as a Special Kind of Philosophical Communication. WISDOM, 18(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v18i2.491

Issue

Section

Articles