Project of Libertarianism in the Conceptual Interpretation of Postmodernity: Microcosm vs Macrocosm and the “Inbetween Man”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.503Keywords:
hermeneutics, conceptual ambivalence, osmological postmodernism, individuation, liberty, reconceptualizationAbstract
The ambivalence of meanings in the postmodern theories accentuates the hermeneutic interpretation of concepts: the new “cosmic meanings” have changed the world picture in quite a revolutionary way. Though the views on postmodernism are contradictory, of principle importance is the idea that there are some valid “inventions”, which have given meaning to this term; in politics, it is the rise of neoliberalism and libertarianism. Thus, the paper aims to research the interrelation of the “inner” logic of the “free indi- vidual”, his/her micro-and macrocosm in libertarianism with the external political transformations and ideological discourses of postmodernity. The research results show that science and arts allow focusing on the interpretation of the consequences of those phenomena, which are going on at the level of the “political unconscious”. The theorists insist on rethinking the categories of libertarianism: the included concepts are challenging to combine in the principle of the domination of liberty. The focus on libertarianism stipulates the novelty of the research as the postmodern feature, which provides validity to the term “late postmod- ernism”. The new cosmology of the third millennium gives the possibility to use the term “cosmological postmodernism”.
Downloads
References
Aksjonova, O. (2008). Izmenenie roli politicheskogo subekta: agent ili aktor? (The change of the role of the political subject: Agent or actor?, in Russian). In A. Yu. Sungurov (Ed), Publichnoe prostranstvo, grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i vlastí (Public space, civil society and power, in Russian) (pp. 81-193). Moscow: Russian Academy of Political Science, Russian Political Encyclopedia.
Appignanesi, R., & Garratt, C. (2006). Introducing postmodernism. Cambridge: Icon books.
Bakhtin, M. (1971). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva (Aesthetics of verbal creativity, in Russian). Moscow: Iskusstvo.
Bakhtin, M. (1979). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva (Aesthetics of verbal creativity, in Russian). Moscow: Iskusstvo.
Brennan, J. (2012). Libertarianism: What everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bulatevych, M. (2019). Concept, peculiarities of constitution and functions of civil society as a structural element of the modern world-system. Interdisciplinary Studies of Complex Systems, 14, 61-80. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31392/iscs.2019.14.061
Caputo, J. (2013). Truth. Philosophy in transit. London: Penguin Books.
Charon, J. (2012). Man in search of himself. Leicester: Spastic Cat Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). Chto takoe filosofiya? (What is philosophy?, in Russian). Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt.
Derrida, J. (2007). Pismo i razlichie (Writing and difference, in Russian). Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt.
Derrida, J. (2012). Polya filosofii (Margins of philosophy, in Russian). Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt.
Drexler, J. (2008). Discovering postmodern cosmology: Discoveries in dark matter, cosmic web, big bang, inflation, cosmic rays, dark energy, accelerating cosmos. Irvine, California: Universal Publishers.
Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2016). Neoliberalism. The key concepts. London: Routledge.
Frege, G. (2012). Sense and reference - One hundred years later. New York: Springer.
Hamowy, R. (2008). The encyclopedia of libertarianism. University of Alberta. London: SAGE Publications.
Jameson, F. (2009). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New York: Verso.
Keller, C., & Daniel, A. (2002). Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernism. New York: SUNY Press.
Konstantinov, M. (2007). Vklad M. K. Petrova v novuyu institutsionalnuyu politiku (M. K. Petrovís contribution in the new institutional policy, in Russian). In S. G. Ayvazova & S. V. Patrushev (Eds), Novye napravleniya politicheskoi nauki: Gendernaya politologiya. Institutsionalínaya politologiya. Politicheskaya ekonomiya. Sotsialínaya politika (New directions of political science: Gender political science. Institutional political science. Political economy. Social politics, in Russian) (pp. 26-40). Moscow: Russian Association of Political Science, Russian Political Encyclopedia.
Kropotkin, P. (1991). Etika (Ethics, in Russian). Moscow: Publishing house of political literature.
Leier, M., & Bakunin, M. (2009). The creative passion. New York: Stories Press.
Mack, E. (2018). Libertarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1972). The German ideology. New York: International Publishers.
Rothbard, M. (2006). For a new liberty: The libertarian manifesto. California: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.
Seresova, U. (2007). Sotsialínaya politika: sotsialínaya spravedlivost vs legitimatsiya politicheskoi vlasti (Social policy: Social justice vs legitimation of the political power, in Russian). In S. G. Ayvazova & S. V. Patrushev (Eds), Novye napravleniya politicheskoi nauki: Gendernaya politologiya. Institutsionalínaya politologiya. Politicheskaya ekonomiya. Sotsialínaya politika (New directions of political science: Gender political science. Institutional political science. Political economy. Social politics, in Russian) (pp. 322-338). Moscow: Russian Association of Political Science, Russian Political Encyclopedia.
Simon, W. (1996). Postmodern sexualities. London: Routledge.
St. Claire, P. (2017). Cosmology on trial. Cracking the cosmic code. California: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.
Vallentyne, P. (2001). Left libertarianism and its critics: The contemporary debate. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yurchenko, I. (2007). Rolí politicheskogo diskursa v vosproizvodstve gosudarstvennogo stroya (The role of the political discourse in the reproduction of the state system, in Russian). In L. I. Nikovskaya (Ed), Mirovye protsessy, politicheskie konflikty i bezopasností (World processes, political conflicts and safety, in Russian) (pp. 209-220). Moscow: Association of Political Science.
Zizek, S. (2019). Like a thief in broad daylight: Power in the era of post-human capitalism. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author and scientific journal WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.