Philosophical and Psychological Approach to Self-Development of Scientific and Pedagogical Workers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v20i4.560Keywords:
philosophy, psychological approach, self-development, pedagogy, pedagogical workersAbstract
The study?s main purpose is to highlight the philosophical and psychological aspects of the self- development of scientific and pedagogical workers in the context of the development of the education sys- tem. The article uses various methods to conduct research, namely general scientific methods: formal- logical, systemic, structural-functional, concrete-historical. The pedagogical synergetics is considered as part of the research. Pedagogical synergetics, which explains the development of a complex system, edu- cation, is a new philosophy of the educational process. Pedagogical synergetics makes it possible to ap- proach the development of problems of the development of pedagogical systems and the pedagogical pro- cess in a new way, considering them primarily from the standpoint of openness, co-creation and orienta- tion towards self-development. As a result, philosophical, psychological and pedagogical approaches to self-improvement are characterized.
Downloads
References
Bakker, A,. Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
Bauer, J., Park, S., Montoya, R., & Wayment, H. (2015). Growth motivation toward two paths of eudaimonic self-development. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 185-210.
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J., & Quinn, R. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Frederickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
Frunz„, S.. (2018). Philosophy, spirituality, therapy. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 17(51), 162-178.
Halliwell, E., & Dittmar, H. (2009). The role of self-improvement and self-evaluation motives in social comparisons with idealized female bodies in the media. Body Image, 2(3), 249-261.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695-706.
Mascall ?., & Rolheiser, ?. (2006). Pedagogical synergy: Linking assessment, curriculum, and instruction. Brock Education Journal, 16(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v16i1.78
Kryshtanovych, M., Golub, V., K?zakov V., Pakhomova , T., & Polovtsev, O. (2021). Socio-Ecological Effect of Public Management of Green Development in the Context of the Philosophy of Modern Ecology. WISDOM, 19(3), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.493
Mes·roöov·, M. (2014). The relationship of self-care, self-efficacy, and self-development among university students. In J. Benka, R. äebeÚa, & L. Hricov· (Eds.), Health promotion - Self-care - Risk-taking behavior prevention (pp.59-69). Koöice: Pavol Jozef äaf·rik University in Koöice, Faculty of Arts.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893-917.
Smirnov, E. I., Smirnov, N. E., & Uvarov, A. D. (2017). Stages of technological support of the self-organization process in mathematical education of the future teacher. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 3, 102-111.
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behaviour: A new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-28.
Taylor, S. E., Neter, E., & Wayment, H. A. (1995). Self-evaluation processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1278-1287.
Tenner, M., Affleck, G., & Greshman, K. (1986). Self-blame among parents of infants prenatal complications: the role of self-protective motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 690-696.
Tims, M., Bakker, A., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-Being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230-240.
Vavricov·, M. & Lovaö, L. (2013). Self-regulation in the sphere of self-care. Abstracts from International Conference Motivation in Social Context: Theory and Practice (pp 32-33). Krakow: Jagiellonian University.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.
Yushko, E. N. (2012). Use of synergetic approaches for the organization of effective independent work of students. Fundamental Research, 6(1), 77-81.
Zawadzka, A. M. (2014). Readiness for self-improvement questionnaire - tool reliability and accuracy analysis. Acta Neuropsychologica, 12(1), 73-84.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological development, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 scientific journal WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.