The Principle of Deliberation as a Key Basis of Statehood in Modern Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.664Keywords:
Russian statehood, deliberative democracy, deliberation principle, self-regulationAbstract
The development of statehood is predetermined by a great variety of factors. In modern society, citizens are developing an increasing willingness to fully participate in political and legal processes jointly with the state. Today the ideas of deliberative democracy attract the close attention of legal theorists in this aspect. The subject of the research is the key aspects of the philosophical and legal treatment of social relations in the sphere of realisation of the principle of deliberation in modern Russia. The purpose of this study is a multilevel analysis (general legal, philosophical, technical/legal) of the principle of deliberation, with substantiation of its significance as a key foundation of statehood in modern Russia. The research results confirm the initial hypothesis and evidence that the goal of the study has been achieved. The correlation of state and public interests in terms of deliberative interaction is of fundamental importance for the development of Russian statehood.
Downloads
References
Baranov, P. P. (2003). Instituty grazhdanskogo obshchestva v pravovom prostranstve sovremennoi Rossii (Civil society institutes in the legal space of modern Russia, in Russian). (Synopsis of thesis for the degree of PhD in Law, Rostov Law Institute MVD of Russia, Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Bashkarev, A. A. (2008). Electronnaya demokratiya kak forma politicheskoi kommunikatsii (Electronic democracy as a form of political communication, in Russian). Isvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeny A. I. Gercena (Proceedings of Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, in Russian), 69, 25-29.
Bessette, J. M. (2011). Tikhiy golos razuma. Deliberativnaya democratiya i amerikanskaya systema gosudarstvennoi vlasty (The mild voice of reason: Deliberative democracy and american national government, in Russian). Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopaedia Publishing House.
Habermas, J. (1992). Demokratiya. Rasum. Nravstvennost (Democracy, reason, morality, in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.
Habermas, J. (2010). Problemy legitimatsii pozdnego kapitalizma (The problem of late capitalism legitimation, in Russian). (L. V. Voropai, Trans; O. V. Kildyushov, Ed.).Moscow: Pracsis.
Jouvenel, B. (2011). Vlast. Estestvennaya teoriya ee vozrastaniya (On power: Its nature and the history of its growth, in Russian). (B. de Jouvenel, Ed.; V. P. Gaidamak & A. V. Mateshuk, Trans). Moscow: IRISAN: Mysl.
Kayshev, A. V. (2005). Ugolovno-pravovoe znacheniye kompromissov i pooshchreniy (Significance of compromises and incentives in terms of criminal law, in Russian). (Synopsis of PhD Thesis). Retrieved from http://lawtheses.com/ugolovno-pravovoe-znachenie-kompromissov-i-pooschreniy#ixzz32o6sYfPi
Kurdyumov, S. P., & Malinetsky, G. G. (1989). Synergetyca ñ teoriya samoorganisatsii: idei, metody, persrectivy (Synergetics ñ self-organisation theory: Ideas, methods, prospects, in Russian). Moscow: Znanye.
Lapaeva, V. (n.d.). Politiko-pravovaya kontseptsiya U. Habermasa (s positsii libertarnogo pravoponimaniya) (J. Habermasí political legal concept (From the perspective of libertarian legal views), in Russian). Retrieved from http://igpran.ru/public/articles/ Lapaeva.Polit_prav_konc_Xabermasa.pdf
Lyakhovich-Petrakova, N. V. (2011). Idei deliberativnoi demokratii kak kontseptualnaya basa obshchestvennoi ekspertizy v otsenke publichnoy politiki (Ideas of deliberative democracy as a conceptual basis of public expertise in evaluation of public policy, in Russian). Uchenyie zapiski Brestskogo gosudarstvennogo universitena imeny A. Pushkina (Proceedings of Brest State A. Pushkin University, in Russian), 7, 33-39.
Makoveev, N. I. (2000). Kompromiss kak politico-kulturnyi fenomen (Compromise as a politico-cultural phenomenon, in Russian). (PhD Thesis). Retrieved from http://www.dissercat.com/content/kompromiss-kak-politiko-kulturnyi-fenomen#ixzz32o7nMOXp
Maltsev, G. V. (2007). Sotsialnoye osnovaniye prava (Social foundation of law, in Russian).Moscow: Infra-M.
Mochalov, A. N. (n.d.). Deliberativnaya demokratiya v mestnykh soobshchestvakh: rossiyskiy I sarubezhnyi opyt (Deliberative democracy in local communities: Russian and foreign experience, in Russian). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/38708846/
Morley, J. (2010). O kompromisse. V sashchitu svobody mysli (About a compromise: In defence of freedom of thought) (3rd ed.). Moscow: Publication LKI.
Nikiforuk, V. P. (2001).Mobilisatsyonnyi tip rasvityia: osobyi put Rossii (Mobilisation Type of Development: A Special Way of Russia). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 12. Polititcheskiye nauki (Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science, in Russian), 6. 104-108.
Osvetimskaya, I. I. (2014). Kommunikatsyya kak konstitutsionnyi priznak gosudarstva (v contecste globalisatsii) (Communication as a constitutive feature of the state (In the context of globalisation), in Russian). In M. V. Antonov, & I. L. Chestnov (Eds.), Kommunikativnaya teoriya prava i sovremennye problem jurisprudentsii: k 60-letiyu Andreya Vasilyevicha Polyakova: kollektivnaya monographiya: v 2 tomakh (Communicative theory of law and modern problems of jurisprudence: dedicated to the 60th anniversary of Andrey Vasilyevich Polyakov. Collective monograph: in 2 volumes. V. 2. Topical Issues of Philosophy of Law and Legal Science in the Context of Communicative Theory of Law, in Russian) (pp. 160-172). Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press.
Pashentsev, D. A. (2019). Rossiyskaya sakonotvorcheskaya traditsiya pered vysovom tsifrovisatsii (Russian lawmaking tradition facing the challenge of digitalisation, in Russian). Journal of Russian Law, 2(266), 5-13.
Polyakov, A. V. (2014). Normativnost pravovoi kommunikatsii: Kommunikativnoe pravoponimaniye. Izbrannye trudy (Regulatory character of legal communication, in Russian). Communicative legal consciousness: Selected works. Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press.
Prigozhin, I., & Nicholis, G. (1990). Samoorganisatsiya neravnovesnyh system: ot disspativnykh system k uporyadochennosty cherez fluktuatsii (Self-organization of nonequilibrium systems: From dissipative systems to orderliness through fluctuations, in Russian). Moscow: Myr.
Sorokin, V. V. (2007). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava perekhodnogo perioda (Theory of the state and law in the transition period, in Russian). Barnaul: Publication AltGU.
Uglov, D. V. (2010). Rol diskursa sotsialnoy spravedlivocty v formirovanii obshchestva deliberativnoy demokratii (Role of discourse of social justice in the formation of deliberative democracy society, in Russian). (Synopsis of thesis for the degree of PhD in Law). Moscow: Bauman Moscow State Technical University.
Zaitsev, A. V. (2013). Deliberativnaya demokratiya kak institutsionalny dialog vlasty i gragdanskogo obshchestva (Deliberative democracy as an institutional dialogue of power and civil society, in Russian). Sociodinamica (Sociodynamics, in Russian), 5, 29-44. doi: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.5.689
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author and scientific journal WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
