Dialectics of Philosophical Pillars of the Law and Development Doctrine

Authors

  • Alexei MALINOVSKY MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
  • Pavel DOBROTVORSKY MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.668

Keywords:

Law and Development doctrine, liberal legalism, post-development, postmodernism, sustainable development

Abstract

This article analyses the philosophical foundations of the Law and Development doctrine, which has been used as a practical tool since the 1950s in many countries in an attempt to improve their socio-economic conditions. Since the adoption of the UN Resolution on Sustainable Development Goals in 2015, most countries have been making efforts to achieve it. We emphasize two philosophical-legal traditions in Law and Development under consideration, which in many respects display antagonistic attitudes to each other: liberal legalism and the ideas of postmodernism philosophy, in particular, the ideas of post-development. The dialectics of this contradiction is revealed in an attempt by liberal legalism to spread itself beyond the western legal systems. Postmodernism, which has been influenced by left-wing political and legal doctrines (neo-Marxism), is aimed at taking into account the interests of local cultures and more equitable distribution of global public goods as a development priority. Following the logic of G. F. Hegel, the evolution of Law and Development can be presented as the spiral reflecting the interaction of law and development theories that began to unwind in the second half of the XX century and continues its upward movement to the present moment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alexei MALINOVSKY, MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

PhD, Doctor of Science in Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Legal Theory and Comparative Law of Faculty of International Law of MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. His areas of interest include criminal law of foreign countries, history and methodology of jurisprudence, legal anthropology. Malinovsky is the author of over 100 scientific publications on topical issues of comparative law and the general theory of law. Recent publications: “International Treaty Rulemaking as a Political Process: History and Theory Issues”, “Digitalization of Higher Legal Education in Russia in the Age of Covid-19”.

Pavel DOBROTVORSKY, MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

Postgraduate Researcher at the Department of Legal Theory and Comparative Law of Faculty of International Law of MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. His areas of interest include legal theory, empirical legal studies, law and development, law and economics. Dobrotvorsky is the author of over ten scientific articles. Recent publications: “Advanced Theories and Models of Interaction between Law and Socio-Economic Development in Western Jurisprudence”, “Law and Development Reflections in Russia: Perspectives of the Theory and Field Policy”, “Legal Development Modelling in the Context of Global Issues”.

References

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse. Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics. The real and the possible. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine. ìDevelopment,î depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Foreign Assistance Act (2003). Legislation on Foreign Relations through 2002. Vol. 1-A. U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved from https://www.usaid.gov/

Kashnikov, B. N. (2004). Liberalnye teorii spravedlivosti I politicheskaya practika Rossii (Liberal theories of justice and political practice, in Russia). V. Novgorod: Novgorod State Univer-sity Press.

Kuzmenko, I. V. (2009). Neokolonialism v mezduanarodnikh institutah podderzki slaborazvityh gosudarstv (na primere Vsemirnogo Banka) (Neocolonialism in international institutions supporting underdeveloped states (On the World Bank data), in Russian). Philosophy of Law Journal, 2, 86-88.

Latouche, S. (2004). Survivre au dÈveloppement. De la dÈcolonisation de líimaginaire Èconomique a la construction díune sociÈtÈ alternative (Survive development. From the decolonization of the economic imagination to the construction of an alternative society, in French). …ditions Mille et une Nuits, department de la Librairie Arthe`me Fayard.

Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to growth. Polity Press.

Law and Development (1974). The future of law and development research. Report of the research advisory committee on law and development. New York: International Legal Center.

Lee, Y. S. (2020). New general theory of economic development: Innovative growth and distribu-tion. Review of Economic Development, 24(2), 1-33.

Rahnema, M. (1998). The post-development reader. Zed Books. London & New York.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Rist, G. (2008). The history of development. From western origins to global faith (3rd ed.). London & New York: Zed Books.

Sachs, W. (2010). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (2nd ed.). London & New York: Zed Books.

Trubek, D., & Galanter, M. (1974). Scholars in self-estrangement: Reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review, 4, 1062-1104.

Truman, H. S. (1949). Harry Truman inaugural address. American rhetoric. Online Speech Bank. Retrieved from https://www.americanrhetoric.com/

United States Agency of International Development History (2021). Celebrating Fifty Years of Pro-gress. USAID Today. Retrieved from https://www.usaid.gov/

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

How to Cite

MALINOVSKY, A., & DOBROTVORSKY, P. (2021). Dialectics of Philosophical Pillars of the Law and Development Doctrine. WISDOM, 1(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.668