The Aesthetic Doctrine of Law (Aesthetics of Law) in the Context of the Development of Nbics Technologies

Authors

  • Nikolai CHERNOGOR Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Alexander EMELYANOV Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Maksim ZALOILO Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.674

Keywords:

philosophy of law, law, legal order, NBICS technologies, aesthetics, aesthetics of law, intuitive social interface, beauty, expediency

Abstract

The development of NBICS technologies is one of the factors of transformation of the mechanism of social regulation, including law, which acts as a means and as an object of socio-economic modernization. The scientific search creates new contexts in the study of law, serves as a prerequisite for rethinking its es­sence and role in the life of modern society, determines the formulation of a number of questions, inclu­ding the consequences of technological progress for the legal existence of a person. In line with this kind of research, new areas of research have been identified – “legal cognitology”, “functional identify­ca­tion of law”. One of the promising ideas is an appeal to aesthetics, more precisely, to the regularities of the deve­lopment of law, which can be learned through the methodology of this field of knowledge. The sub­ject of the article is the methodology of knowledge of the law. The purpose is to establish the possibility of ex­pan­ding the methodology of knowledge of law through the methods of aesthetics and NBICS techno­lo­gies. The result is a reasonable hypothesis that the development and implementation of NBICS technolo­gies allow us to apply aesthetic methods to the establishment of the regularities of the genesis of law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nikolai CHERNOGOR, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

PhD, Doctor of Science in Law, Professor at Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Director of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. He is interested in modern problems of philosophy and theory of law. Chernogor is the developer of the general theory of legal order, the concept of legal monitoring, the functional identification of law in the conditions of increasing uncertainty in modern society, etc. Author of more than 100 scientific publications.

Alexander EMELYANOV, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

PhD, Doctor of Science in Law, Associate Professor, the Head of the Department of Administrative Legislation and Process of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. His interests include the mechanism of legal regulation, public administration, methodology of knowledge of the law, legal order, and legal responsibility. Emelyanov is the author of more than 150 scientific publications, including 14 monographs (individual and collective).

Maksim ZALOILO, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

PhD in Law, Leading Researcher at the Department of Theory of Law and Interdisciplinary Research of Legislation of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. He is interested in modern problems of the theory and methodology of law and law-making, the author of books on the general theory of legal order, artificial intelligence in law, the digital state and the digital legal environment, changes in technological structures, etc.

References

Alexy, R. (2011). Ponjatie i dejstvitelíností prava. Otvet juridicheskomu pozitivizmu (The concept and validity of law. A response to legal positivism, in Russian). Moscow: Infotropic Media.

Bergbohm, K. (1892). Jurisprudenz und Rechtsphilosophie (Jurisprudence and philosophy of law, in German) (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

Carbonnier, J. (1986). Juridicheskaja sociologija (Legal sociology, in Russian). Moscow: Progress.

Chernogor, N. N., Emelyanov, A. S., & Zaloilo, M. V. (2021a). Genezis postmoderna: k voprosu o funkcionalínoj identifikacii v prave (The genesis of postmodernity: On the question of functional identification in law, in Russian). Voprosy istorii (Issues of History, in Russian), 6(1), 185-194.

Chernogor, N. N., Emelyanov, A. S., & Zaloilo, M. V. (2021b). Gosudarstvennye gimny v mekhanizme kodirovanija pravovogo povedenija: istoricheskij opyt Rossii (National anthems in the mechanism of coding legal behavior: The historical experience of Russia, in Russian). Voprosy istorii (Issues of History, in Russian), 4(2), 43-54.

Chernogor, N. N., Emelyanov, A. S., & Zaloilo, M. V. (2021c). ìDolgovye krizisyî v mirovoj istorii i kognitivností pravoporjadka: retrospektivnaja refleksija (ìDebt crisesî in world history and the cognitiveness of the legal order: A retrospective reflection, in Russian). Voprosy istorii (Issues of History, in Russian), 5(2), 70-81.

Durkheim, E. (1996). O razdelenii obshhestvennogo truda (On the division of social labor, in Russian). Moscow: Kanon.

Gurvich, G. D. (2004). Filosofija i sociologija prava. Izbrannye sochinenija (Philosophy and sociology of law. Selected essays, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: Izdatelískij Dom S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta, Izdatelístvo juridicheskogo fakulíteta S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1990). Filosofija prava (Philosophy of law, in Russian). Moscow: Izdatelístvo ìMyslíî.

Kazimirchuk, V. P. (1970). Socialínyj mekhanizm dejstvija prava (The social mechanism of the law, in Russian). Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo (Soviet State and Law, in Russian), 10, 37-44.

Khabrieva, T. Y. (2016). Konstitucionnaja reforma v sovremennom mire (Constitutional reform in todayís context, in Russian). Moscow: RAS Nauka.

Khabrieva, T. Y., & Chernogor, N. N. (2020). Budushhee prava. Nasledie akademika V.S. Stepina i juridicheskaja nauka (The future of law. The legacy of academician V.S. Stepin and legal science, in Russian). Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences; The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation; INFRA-M.

Kudryavtsev, V. N. (1978). Pravo i povedenie (Law and behavior, in Russian). Moscow: Juridicheskaja literatura.

Lazarev, V. V. (2004). Poisk prava (Pursuit of law, in Russian). Zhurnal rossijskogo prava (Journal of Russian Law, in Russian), 7, 3-14.

Lazarev, V. V. (2016). Tolkovanie prava: klassika, modern i postmodern (Interpretation of law: classics, modern and postmodern, in Russian). Zhurnal rossijskogo prava (Journal of Russian Law, in Russian), 8, 15-28.

Losev, A. F. (2017). Jestetika Vozrozhdenija (Aesthetics of the Renaissance, in Russian). Moscow: Kulítura: Akademicheskij proekt.

Losev, A. F., & Shestakov, V. P. (1965). Istorija jesteticheskih kategorij (History of aesthetic categories, in Russian). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Maenchen-Helfen, O. (2014). Istorija i kulítura gunnov (History and culture of the Huns, in Russian). Moscow: Centrpoligraf.

Nersesyants, V. S. (2002). Filosofija prava: libertarno-juridicheskaja koncepcija (The philosophy of law: A libertarian-legal concept, in Russian). Voprosy filosofii (Issues of Philosophy, in Russian), 3, 3-15.

Petrazhitsky, L. I. (1908). Vvedenie v izuchenie prava i nravstvennosti. Osnovy emocionalínoj psihologii (Introduction to the study of law and morality. Fundamentals of emotional psychology, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: Tipografija Ju.N. Jerlih.

Petrazhitsky, L. I. (1909). Teorija prava i gosudarstva v svjazi s teoriej nravstvennosti (The theory of law and the state in connection with the theory of morality, in Russian) (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Saint Petersburg: Tip. T-va ìEkateringofskoe Pechatnoe Deloî.

Petrovskaya, E. V. (2021). Fotogenija revoljucii (The photogeny of revolution, in Russian). Filosofskij zhurnal (Philosophy Journal, in Russian). 2(14), 111-122.

Tyurin, A. (1994). I. Brodskij. ìJstetika ñ matí etikiî. Intervíju (I. Brodsky. ìAesthetics is the mother of ethicsî. Interview, in Russian). Zerkalo nedeli (Mirror of the week, in Russian), 11. Retrieved from http://noblit.ru/node/1298

Yavich, L. S. (1976). Obshhaja teorija prava (General theory of law, in Russian). Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

How to Cite

CHERNOGOR, N., EMELYANOV, A., & ZALOILO, M. (2021). The Aesthetic Doctrine of Law (Aesthetics of Law) in the Context of the Development of Nbics Technologies. WISDOM, 1(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.674

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Special Issue: Philosophy of Law

Section

Philosophy of Law

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Author and scientific journal WISDOM

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC