Value and Regulatory Foundations for Digital Transformation of Modern Social Relations: Theological and Conservative Legal Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.678Keywords:
big data, blockchain, state, artificial intelligence, politics, law, religion, traditions, digitalization, evolutionAbstract
This paper examines the value-normative transformation of the modern social system and analyzes the impact of digitalization processes on social relations and their development. The content of the article substantively analyzes the key areas of digitalization of social relations; the authors mark out in each of these areas positive and negative effects on the sustainable development of the socio-cultural integrity of society. The empirical material used in this work includes expert assessments and analytical materials related to the digital transformation of traditional religious systems and the value-normative foundations of society. The research perspectives presented in this paper evaluate and interpret all the events and processes under consideration from the conservative legal point of view, from the standpoint of the significance of the socio-cultural environment, sustainable traditional institutions and values for coding and predicting the digital transformation of society in the 21st century.
In the conclusion of the study, the authors substantiate the adequacy of the doctrinal and legal model of society’s development called “digital etatism” from the perspective of ensuring stable socio-cultural development and the integrity of the social system.
Downloads
References
Akhmedov, R. M. (2021). Digital religion i traditsionnyye religioznyye tsennosti. Osobennosti sootnosheniya (po materialam elektronnykh resursov) (Digital religion and traditional religious values. Features of the correlation (based on materials from electronic resources), in Russian). Moscow: UNITY-DANA.
Avanesyan, A. (2019). Metafizika segodnya (Metaphysics today, in Russian). Moscow: V-A-C Press.
Baldwin, R. (2018). Velikaya konvergentsiya: informatsionnyye tekhnologii i novaya globalizatsiya (The Great convergence: Information technology and new globalization, in Russian). Moscow: Delo Publishing House, RANEPA.
Brockman, J. (2017). Chto my dumaem o mashinakh, kotorye dumayut: Vedushchie mirovye uchenye ob iskusstvennom intellekte (What do we think about machines that think: Todayís leading thinkers on the age of machine intelligence, in Russian). Moscow: Alpina non-fiction.
Chistov, K. V. (1986). Narodnyye traditsii i folíklor: ocherki teorii (Folk traditions and folklore: Theory essays, in Russian). Academy of Sciences of the USSR, the N. N. Miklouho-Maclay Institute of Ethnography. Leningrad: Science.
Freud, Z. (n.d.). Nedovolístvo kulíturoy (Dissatisfaction with culture, in Russian). Retrieved from https://librebook.me/civilization_and_its_discontents/vol1/1
Greenfield, A. (2018). Radikalínye tekhnologii: ustroystvo povsednevnoy zhizni (Radical technologies: The design of everyday life, in Russian). Moscow: Delo Publishing House, RANEPA.
Harari, Yu. N. (2017). Homo Deus. Kratkaya istoriya budushchego (Homo Deus. A brief history of the future, in Russian). Moscow: Sinbad.
Khabrieva, T. Ya., & Chernogor, N. N. (2020). Budushcheye prava. Naslediye akademika V. S. Stopina i yuridicheskaya nauka. (The future of law. The legacy of Academician V. S. Stepin and legal science, in Russian). Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation. Moscow: INFRA-M.
Kipshidze, V. (2017). IT-strategiya Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi (IT strategy of the Russian Orthodox Church, in Russian). Retrieved from https://www.cnews.ru/articles/2017-03-29_itstrategiya_russkoj_pravoslavnoj_tserkvi
Kruss, V. I. (2020). Lichnostnye (ìsomaticheskieî) prava cheloveka v konstitutsionnom i filosofsko-pravovom izmerenii: k postanovke problemy (Personal (ìsomaticî) human rights in the constitutional and philosophico-legal dimension: to the problem statement, in Russian). Gosudarstvo i pravo (State and Law, in Russian), 10, 43-50.
Mamychev, A. Yu., Mordovtsev, A. Yu., & Ovchinnikov, A. I. (2015). Natsionalíno-kulíturnye osnovy rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti i pravovoy politiki (National and cultural foundations of Russian statehood and legal policy, in Russian). Vladivostok: VSUES Publishing House.
Martynenko, A. (2018, June 4). Poyavilasí pervaya v mire religiya, osnovannaya na blokcheyne, na russkom yazyke (The worldís first blockchain-based religion appeared, in Russian. Tekhnokulít (High technology news, science and technology, in Russian). Retrieved from https://www.techcult.ru/technology/5386-religiya-na-baze-blokchejna
Mazin, V. (2018). Mashina vliyaniya (The machine of influence, in Russian). Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House.
Pope Benedict XVI (n.d.). Entsiklika ìKaritas v veritateî (Encyclical ìCaritas in veritateî, in Russian). Retrieved from https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/ru/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate.html
Potseluev, E. L. & Danilova, E. S. (2015). Ponyatiye i vidy lichnykh (somaticheskikh) prav cheloveka (Concept and types of personal (somatic) human rights, in Russian). Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Sostoyaniye (Electronic scientific journal. The science. Society. State, in Russian), 1(9). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-i-vidy-lichnostnyh-somaticheskih-prav-cheloveka/viewer
Schwab, K. (2019). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya (The fourth industrial revolution, in Russian). Moscow: Publishing house Exom.
Smirnov, M. Yu. (2019). Tsifrovizatsiya kak ìobnuleniyeî religiy (Digitalization as ìZeroingî of religions, in Russian). Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina (Bulletin of the Leningrad State University. A.S. Pushkin, in Russian), 3, 137-146.
Smirnov, M. Yu. (Ed.) (2017). Encyclopedic dictionary of sociology of religion. Saint Petersburg: Platonic Philosophical Society.
Sotsiokulíturnye (arkhetipicheskie i mentalínye) osnovy gosudarstvenno-vlastnoy organizatsii obshchestva (Sociocultural (Archetypal and mental) foundations of the public-power organization of society, in Russian). (2020). Moscow: RIOR: INFRA-M.
Tsentzura, K. (n.d.). Blokcheyn-propovedniki i giki-buddisty. Pyatí samykh populyarnykh tsifrovykh religii (Blockchain preachers and Buddhist geeks. The five most popular digital religions, in Russian). Retrieved from https://techno.nv.ua/it-industry/pjat-samykh-populjarnykh-tsifrovykh-relihij-2475250.html
Volodenkov, S. V., Voronov, A. S., Leontyeva, L. S., & Sukhareva, M. (2021). Tsifrovoy suverenitet sovremennogo gosudarstva v usloviyakh tekhnologicheskoi transformatsii: soderzhanie i osobennosti (Digital sovereignty of the modern state in the context of technological transformations: Content and features, in Russian). Polilog (Polylogos, in Russian), 5(1). Retrieved from https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/357578773/
Zabiyako, A. P. (Ed.). (2012). Kiberreligiya: nauka kak faktor religioznykh transformatsiy (Cyber religion: Science as a factor of religious transformations, in Russian). Blagoveshchensk: Amur State University.
Zhao, H. (2020). Kiberprostranstvo i suverenitet. Vvedenie v zakonodatelístvo o kiberbezopasnosti (Cyberspace and sovereignty. An introduction to cybersecurity legislation, in Russian). Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-History.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author and scientific journal WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
