The Development of Creative Organization Potential in the Context of Intelligent Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v2i1.776Keywords:
interaction of components of the creative potential, intellectualization of production, multiple intelligence, assessment of the creative potential of the organization, the structure of creativityAbstract
This study aims to determine, from the standpoint of the philosophy, the creativity of approach to measuring and specifying the components of the creative potential of an organization to assess its level and further development in the conditions of the intellectualization of modern production. The subject of the study is the interaction of the components of creative potential. The study's hypothesis builds on the problem of the multi-aspect nature of the industrial activity, what in the conditions of digitalization and the use of artificial intelligence requires creativity in various subject areas.
Research objectives: to reason the scientific approach of structural and logical ‘dissection’ of creative potential to identify its key components; to develop the structure of the creative potential; to determine methods for measuring the components of the creative potential of the organization. The authors proposed a structural and logical model to form and develop creative potential. The integrating module of this model is a four-component creative group of interacting subpotentials, selected by subject-functional areas: subject-functional: intellectual-innovative, industrial-technological, organizational-economical and socio-cultural since the results of creativity are concentrated in these areas and can be measured in specially selected indicators.
Downloads
References
Amabile, T., Barsade, S., Mueller, J., & Staw, B. (2005). Affekt i tvorchestvo na rabote (Affect and creativity at work, in Russian). Adminiostrativnaya nauka Ezhekwartalíno (Administartive Science Quarterly, in Russian), 50, 367-403.
https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
Basic, M. Y. (2017). Social technologies for the development of individual creative potential of managers in a Russian commercial organization. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 11, 246-251.
Boginsky, A. I., Zelentsova, L. S., & Tikhonov, A. I. (2019). Intelligent monitoring as the basis for improving the competitiveness of high-tech production. In A. Bogoviz, Y. Raguina (Eds.), Industry competitiveness: Digitalization, management, and integration (pp. 436-443, Vol. 115). ISCI Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer, Cham.
Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.-B., & Adam-Troian, J. (2021). Creative individuals are social risk-takers: Relationships between creativity, social risk-taking and fear of negative evaluations. Creativity, 7(2), 309-320.
Brizhak, O. V., & Romanets, I. I. (2021). Creative potential in the development of national ecosystems. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 689(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/689/1/012004
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2018). Views on creativity, environmental sustainability and their integrated development. Creative Education, 9(5), 719-743.
Chiaradonna, R. (2009). Physics and philosophy of nature in Greek Neoplatonism. Proceedings of the European science foundation exploratory workshop. Leiden - Boston: Brill.
Ermakova, L., & Sukhovskaya, D. (2016). Evolution of understanding of creative (creative) potential of personality in classical philosophical thought. Philosophical Sciences, 10(72), 89-92.
Gorlacheva, E., Gudkov, A., Omelchenko, I., Drogovoz, P., & Koznov, D. (2018). Knowledge management capability impact on enterprise performance in Russian high-tech sector. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (pp. 1-9). ICE/ITMC, Stuttgart.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Kaufman, J. C., & Glaveanu, V. P. (2019). A review of creativity theories: What questions are we trying to answer? In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 27-43) (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loseva, O. V., & Abdikeev, N. M. (2020). Sistema ocenki organizacionnogo, chelovecheskogo i potrebitel'skogo kapitala dlya effektivnogo upravleniya intellektual'nym kapitalom vysokotekhnologichnyh cifrovyh kompanij (A system for assessing organizational, human and consumer capital for the effective management of intellectual capital of high-tech digital companies, in Russian). Upravlenceskie nauki (Management Sciences, in Russian), 10(3), 33-47.
Mikhailov, A., Tikhonov, A. & Margarov, G. (2022). The value potential of an engineer in a hightech environment and digitalization of the economy. WISDOM, 21(1), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.24231/wisdom.v21i1.611
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Sternberg, R. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98.
Taylor, C. (1988). Various approaches to and Definitions of creativity. The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zelentsova, L. & Tikhonov, A. (2018). Metodologiya i instrumentarij kompleksnoj ocenki konkurentoustojchivosti naukoemkoj organizacii s ispol'zovaniem cifrovyh tekhnologij (Methodology and tools for integrated assessment of competitiveness of a high-tech organization using digital technologies, in Russian). Moscow: GUU Publishing House.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 scientific journal WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
