The Relationship of the Philosophy of Education and the History of Philosophy: A Forecast of Educational Trends 2022-2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v4i3.835Keywords:
education, philosophy of education, history of philosophy, educational trends, educational perspectivesAbstract
Education is a systemic component of the worldview picture of the world. Along with the scientific and pedagogical arsenal, the historical and philosophical component is a fundamental analytical method of educational space research. The purpose of scientific exploration is to predict educational trends in the short term through the prism of historical and philosophical analysis. Synergetic interaction between the philosophy of education and the history of philosophy forms the basis for the study of practical and theoretical dimensions of modern education. The balance of dialectical and synergetic methods in examining educational trends provides a complete analysis in both practical pedagogical and theoretical-philosophical dimensions. The results of the study allow you to analyze the development of education from a cultural and historical perspective, which allows you to predict the optimal ways of further development of this sphere of social activity. The scientific novelty of the work consists in combining the potential of philosophy, history, science, pedagogy, and culture to forecast educational trends in the coming years. Thus, historical and philosophical interpretation of education points to the demand for three key short-term trends in the modern educational space: globalization, technologization, and informatization.
Downloads
References
Barnett, R. (2021). Thought and reason ñ and their dilemmas. In The Philosophy of Higher Education (pp. 96-106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102939-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102939-11
Barrow, R., & Woods, R. (2021). An introduction to philosophy of education (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120476
Biesta, G. (2019). Obstinate education. Reconnecting school and society. Series: Educational Futures, 72. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401105
Bowden B. (2022). History as philosophy: The search for meaning. Histories, 2(2), 80-90 https://doi.org/10.3390/histories2020008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/histories2020008
Carr, W. (Ed.). (2021). The Routledge Falmer reader in philosophy of education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003209317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003209317
Gearon, L., & Wynne-Davies, M. (2018). Literature and security: CIA engagement in the arts. What philosophers of education need to know and why. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52(4), 742-761. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12333
Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Koenig, H. (2019). Enabling the individual: Simmel, Dewey and ìThe need for a philosophy of educationî. Simmel Studies, 23(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.7202/1062541ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1062541ar
Laplane, L., Mantovani, P., Adolphs, R., Chang, H., Mantovani, A., McFall-Ngai, M., Rovelli, C., Sober, E., & Pradeu, T. (2019). Opinion: Why science needs philosophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 3948-3952. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900357116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900357116
Marcos, A. (2021). Philosophy of science and philosophy: The long flight home. Axiomathes, 31, 695-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09574-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09574-3
Noddings, N. (2018). Philosophy of education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494864
Roth, K., Mollvik, L., Alshoufani, R., Adami, R., Dineen, K., Majlesi, F., Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2020). Philosophy of education in a new key: Constraints and possibilities in present times with regard to dignity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1851189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1851189
Sardoc, M., Coady, C. A. J., Bufacchi, V., Moghaddam, F. M., Cassam, Q., Silva, D., Miscevic, N., Andrejc, G., Kodelja, Z., Vezjak, B., Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2021). Philosophy of education in a new key: On radicalization and violent extremism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1861937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1861937
Schumann, C. (2018). Cosmopolitanism and globalization in education. In International Handbook of Philosophy of Education (pp. 821-831). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_59
Van Norden, B. (2019). Taking back philosophy: A multicultural manifesto. New York Chichester: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/van-18436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/van-18436
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mykhailo MARTYNIUK, Kateryna KYRYLENKO, Liudmyla KRYMETS, Tetiana MAKHOMETA, Halyna MADI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
