Psychological Study of the Environmental Factors of Personal Creativity Manifestation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v26i2.992Keywords:
creativity, person, barriers of creativity, relationship, manifestation, study, modelAbstract
The manifestation of a person's creativity is determined by the complex interaction of the conducive and obstructive factors of the environment. We propose a model for the study of creativity, which takes into account the conducive and obstructive factors. The purpose of the article is to study the ratio of conducive and obstructive factors to the manifestation of a person’s creativity. The characteristics of the creativity of modern managers are determined by a unique ratio of conducive and obstructive factors, according to which the impossibility of making independent decisions is an obstructive factor for them; and the freedom to express their thoughts is an conducive factor, the fear of making mistakes and the fear of criticism are obstructive factors; and the spark of new thoughts and ideas, the inspiration and enthusiasm to create new ideas are considered to be conducive factors. Such a correlation of contributing and hindering factors of personal creativity is the basis for developing a new model of studying and developing personal creativity. Thus, the creativity study model is built from the level of creativity, standards, personal qualities of creativity, the relationship between them, the factors contributing to and hindering creativity, their unique relationship.
Downloads
References
Abel, G. (2009). The riddle of creativity: Philosophy's view. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds), Milieus of creativity. Knowledge and space (Vol. 2, pp. 53-73). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_5
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. Journal of creativity Behavior, 46(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, S. G., & Staw, M. B. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
Andriopoulos, C. (2001, December). Determinants of organisational creativity: A literature review. Management Decision, 39(10), 834-841. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740110402328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740110402328
Briskman, L. (1980). Creative product and creative process in science and the arts. Inquiry: An In-terdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 23, 83-106, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748008601892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748008601892
Cropley, A. (2006, July). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2015). Kreativnost', Potok i psihologija otkrytij i izobretenij (Creativity, flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, in Russian). Moscow: Career Press.
Edmondson, A. (1999, June). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adminis-trative Science Quarterly, 44(2),350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understand-ing complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch, & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solv-ing: The European perspective (pp. 3-25). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806723
Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418809534284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418809534284
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco, & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143-170). London: Sage Publica-tions.
Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & Engelen, J. M. L. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Tech-nology Management, 20, 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5
Lubart, T. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07
Mackinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17(7), 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046541
Maslow, A. (2022). Dalnie predeli chelovecheskoy psixiki (Far beyond the human psyche, in Rus-sian). Saint Petersburg: Piter.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
Meusburger, P. (2009). Milieus of creativity: The role of places, environments, and spatial contexts. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds), Milieus of creativity. Knowledge and space (Vol. 2, pp. 97-155). Dordrech: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2
Neumann, C. J. (2007). Fostering creativity. A model for developing a culture of collective creativi-ty in science. EMBO Reports, 8(3), 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400913
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634. doi: 10.2307/256657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256657
Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 21-30). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-002
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity as a constrained stochastic process. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 83-101). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-006
Stein, M. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311-322, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897
Sternberg, R. (2009). Domain-generality versus domain-specificity of creativity. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds). Milieus of creativity. Knowledge and space (Vol. 2, pp. 25-39). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_3
Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth-grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626801200401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626801200401
Tunik, E. E. (2003). Williams modified creative tests. Saint Petersburg: Rech.
Williams, F. (1986). The cognitive and affective interaction model for enriching gifted pro-grams.Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented, pp.461-483
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational crea-tivity. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321. doi:10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sona POGHOSYAN, Ruben AGHUZUMTSYAN, Ani KHACHATRYAN, Khachatur GHAZEYAN
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.