Philosophical Perspectives in the “Festal Homilies”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v32i2.1129

Keywords:

“Festal Homilies”, St. Gregory the Illuminator, Armenian Christian philosophy, philosophical perspectives, Christian principles, homiletic tradition, moral-didactic and apologetic discourse

Abstract

Throughout its centuries-long development, philosophy has made a significant contribution to the formation of the spiritual culture and intellectual tradition of the Armenian people. The adoption of Christianity in Armenia and the invention of the Armenian alphabet greatly facilitated the development of Armenian national philosophical thought. The earliest philosophical orientation to take shape within this tradition was Christian apologetics. Representatives of Armenian apologetic philosophy and theology acted as enlighteners and organizers of educational life, defending and substantiating the fundamental doctrines of the Christian faith.Armenian Christian apologists, while critically engaging with the materialistic and dualistic cosmological theories of ancient philosophy that denied the doctrine of creation, produced theological and philosophical works consistent with the dogmatic framework of the Armenian Church, in which the principle of monotheism was systematically articulated. In the process of substantiating Christian doctrinal positions, Armenian apologists frequently drew upon philosophical reasoning and scientific knowledge. A distinctive feature of Armenian Christian apologetics lies in the fact that theology and philosophy, faith and reason, were not perceived as mutually opposing domains but rather as components of a unified intellectual system characterized by internal coherence and interdependence.

The articale referred to the literature St. Gregory the Illuminator named extant work,which affected the further development of  Christian   and philosophical thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abeghyan, M. (1968). “Erk”, h. G (Works, in Armenian). (Vol. 3). Yerevan: Academy of Sciences.

Khachikyan, L. (1973). “O'taralezu hay grakanut'yuny' chorrord darum” (“Foreign-Language Armenian Literature in the Fourth Century”, in Armenian). Patma - Banasirakan Handes, 3(62), 27-52 .

Kyoseyan, H. (2018). Nerac'ut'yun hay ekeghecakan matenagrut'yan, xmb. G. Moy'radyan (Introduction to Armenian Ecclesiastical Literature, in Armenian) (Ed. G. Mouradian). Yerevan: Author's edition.

Martirosyan, A. (1982). Mashtoc (patmaqnnakan tesut'yun), xmb.՝ L. Xachikyan (Mesrop Mashtots (Historical-Critical Study), in Armenian) (Ed. L. Khachikyan). Yerevan: Academy of Sciences.

Pogharian, N. Bishop (1971). Hay groghner E-JhE dar Erusaghe'm (Armenian Writers, 5th–18th Centuries, in Armenian). Jerusalem: S. Hakobyans Printing House.

Sahakyan, D. Archdeacon (2022). Krkin “Hachaxapatum chareri” heghinaki u tvagrman harci shurj, Abraham Teryani mi hratarakutyan artiv (“On the Author and Dating of the Festal Homilies, in Light of Abraham Terian’s Publication”, in Armenian). Yerevan, Banber Matenadarani, 33, 184.

Terian, A. (2021). The Fathers of the Church Series. (Vol. 143). Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.

Ter-Mikelian, A. (1894). Srbo Horn Mero eranelvo Grigori Lusavorchi “Hachaxapatum charq, lusavorq” (St. Gregory the Illuminator`s Hadjakhapatum Chark, in Armenian). Echmiadzin: Printing House S. Echmiadzin.

Zarbhanalyan, G. (1932). Patmut'iun hay dprut'ean D-JhG dar, Venetik (History of Armenian Education, 4th–13th Centuries, in Armenian).Venice.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

PETROSYAN, N. (2025). Philosophical Perspectives in the “Festal Homilies”. WISDOM, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v32i2.1129

Issue

Section

Philosophy of Culture and Religion