Anthropology of Smells: History and Modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v15i2.363Keywords:
human, culture, anthropology of smell, the process of civilization, cultural practices, computer technologiesAbstract
Smell, as evidenced by modern science, is one of the most significant factors influencing human consciousness and behavior. This is due not only to the biological aspects of its origin and the actualization of the bodily being of a human, but also to deeply rooted in culture and society stereotypes and patterns of perception that determine the value system, cognitive attitudes and social structure of each particular culture. This is the essence of relevance of the project of historization and anthropologization of smell, based on the original model of describing the transformation of human cultural practices, which equally takes into account the natural and social aspects of human life and can identify the regulatory mechanisms, order and principles of sociocultural changes. Although a modern man does not fully realize the power of olfactory area of his sense empire, this does not free him from the power of reflex reactions, cultural norms and social demarcations, originating in the olfactory receptivity. Perhaps, that is why the rationalistic ideal of deodorization has not been achieved by modern perfumers, who only mask, but not destroy smells, that are, in some sense, completely indestructible, because they can effectively shape a person’s cultural identity, historical memory and even self-awareness.
Downloads
References
Barthes, R. (1992). Incidents. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Barthes, R. (1997). Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
Baudelaire, Ch. P. (1936). The Flowers of Evil. The Perfume Flask. Selection of Poems. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Baudelaire, Ch., P. (2019). Belgium Stripped Bare. New York: Contra Mundum Press Edition.
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma: the Cultural History of Smell. London & New York: Routledge.
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (2010). Znacheniye i vlast’ zapakha (The Meaning and Power of Smell, in Russian). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Corbin, A. (1986). The Foul and the Fragrant: Odor and the French Social Imagination. New York: Berg Publishers.
Gergilov, R. E. (2007). Problema individualizatsii v sotsiologii Maksa Vebera i Norberta Eliasa: sravnitel’nyi analiz (Problem of Individualization in Max Weber’s and Norbert Elias’s Sociology: Comparative Analysis, in Russian). Sociological Journal of Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3, 108-123.
Ghinea, G. & Ademoye, O. (2012). The Sweet Smell of Success: Enhancing Multimedia Applications with Olfaction. Journal of ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 8(1), 1-17.
Harris, J. M. (1979). Oral and Olfactory Art. The Journal of Aesthetic Education. University of Illinois Press, 13(4), 5-15.
Kabakova, G. (2010). Aromaty i zapakhi v russkoi cul’ture (Scents and Smells in Russian Culture, in Russian). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Kaye, J. N. (2001). Symbolic Olfactory Display. Thesis for the Degree of Master of Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Klimova, Y. A. (2014). Atributivnaya kartina mira v yazyke: lingvokognitivnyi analiz russkikh prilagatel’nykh, oboznachaushchikh zapakh (The Attributive Picture of the World in Russian Language: Linguistic and Cognitive Analysis of Russian Adjectives with the Meaning “Smell”, in Russian). Kazan Monthly Scientific Journal of Young Scientist, 3(62), 827-829.
Kolupaeva, A. A. (2009). Kontsept “zapakh” i sposoby ego reprezentatsii v russkom yazyke (The Concept “Smell” and Ways of its Representation in Russian Language, in Russian). (PhD Dissertation Abstract). Retrieved June 13, 2020, from: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01-003471822.
Kreydlin, G. E. (2002). Neverbal’naya semiotika: yazik tela i estestvennyi yazyk (Non-Verbal Semiotics: Body Language and Natural Language, in Russian). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Laporte, D. (1993). History of Shit. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Levinson, A. G. (2000). Povsyudu chem-to pakhnet (It Smells Something Everywhere, in Russian). Philosophical Literary Journal Logos, 1(22), 24-41.
McLuhan, H. M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge.
Plessner, H. (1975). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Proust, M. (1992). In Search of Lost Time. Swann’s Way. (Vol. 1). New York: The Modern Library.
Rassadina, S. A., & Surova K. E. (2009). Novye traditsii. (New Traditions, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: ID “Petropolis”.
Rassadina, S. A. (2010). Germenevtika udovol'stviya: Naslazhdeniye vkusom. (Hermeneutics of Pleasure: Enjoying the Taste, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: ID “Petropolis”.
Rindisbacher, H. J. (1992). The Smell of Books: A Cultural-Historical Study of Olfactory Perception in Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ryazantsev, S. V. (1997). V mire zapakhov i zvukov. (In the World of Smells and Sounds, in Russian). Moscow: Terra Knizhny’j klub.
Serres, M. (2008). The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker Humblot.
Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The Ultimate Display. Proceedings of IFIP Congress, May 24-29, 1965, in New York, 506-508. Retrieved June 27, 2020, from: https://worrydream.com/refs/Suther-land%20%20The%20Ultimate%20Displa y.pdf
The Holy Bible. (1975). King James Version. New York: HarperCollins Publisher.
Warhol, A. (1975). The Philosophy of Andy Warhol (from A to B and back again). New York: Harcourt Publishing Company.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 WISDOM
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.