Human dignity - the basis of human rights to social protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.404Keywords:
human rights, legal regulation, dignity, social protection, welfare state standardsAbstract
We argue that using human dignity as a criterion for determining social protection measures is an effective method. Although the concept of human dignity used in the constitutions of individual countries and international documents is vague and contradictory, it can be taken as a basis when justifying the human right to such a level of social protection that guarantees life with human dignity. That is, we adhere to the widespread opinion that human rights are justified by human dignity. We discuss how the concept of human dignity can influence the coercion of state authorities in Kazakhstan to fulfil their obligations to citizens on social assistance, how this concept can influence state social policy. Thus, the submissions can serve as a basis for the improvement of the regulatory legal framework in rights and freedoms protection.
Downloads
References
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2009). Predicting Social Security Numbers from Public Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(27), 10975-10980.
Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). An Index of Child Well-Being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 80(1), 133-177.
Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. (1997). The Effects of Poverty on Children. Future of Children, 7(2), 55-71.
Cousins, L. H. (2013). Deservingness, Children in Poverty, and Collective Well Being. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(8), 1252-1259.
Duncan, G. J., & Brooks?Gunn, J. (2000). Family Poverty, Welfare Reform, and Child Development. Child Development, 71 (1), 188-196.
Fuller, B., Kagan, S. L., Caspary, G. L., & Gauthier, C. A. (2002). Welfare Reform and Child Care Options for Low-Income Families. The Future of Children, 12(1), 96-119.
Hofmannová, H. (2018). Comments on the Approach to Human Dignity in Case Law. The Lawyer Quarterly, 8(3), 284-294.
Hook, J. L., Romich, J. L., Lee, J. S., Marcenko, M. O., & Kang, J. Y. (2016). Trajectories of Economic Disconnection among Families in the Child Welfare System. Social Problems, 63(2), 161-179.
Huston, A. C., McLoyd, V. C., & Coll, C. G. (1994). Children and Poverty: Issues in Contemporary Research. Child Development, 65(2), 275-282.
Khaitan, T. (2011). Dignity as an Expressive Norm: Neither Vacuous nor a Panacea. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 32(1), 1-19. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqr024
Khamzina, Z. A., Buribayev, Y. A., Oryntayev, Z. K., & Kuttygalieva, A. (2015). Problems of Overcoming Poverty in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 169-176.
Lee, M. (2008). Universal Human Dignity: Some Reflections in the Asian Context. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 3, 1-33. doi:10.1017/S2194607800000211
Luban, D. (2009). Human Dignity, Humiliation, and Torture. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 19(3), 211-230.
Manomano, T., & Mundau, M. (2017). Preserving Human Dignity: Promises and Pitfalls – a South African Perspective. International Social Work, 60(6), 1358-1369. doi: 10.1177/0020872817712567
McCrudden, C. (2008). Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655-724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043
Mink, G. (1995). Wage Work, Family Work, and Welfare Politics. Feminist Economics, 1(2), 95-98.
Moffitt, R. A. (2015). The Deserving Poor, the Family, and the US Welfare System. Demography, 52(3), 729-749.
Mukhamadiyeva, G. N., Mukaldyeva, G., Karasheva, Z. T., Khamzin, A. S., Buribayev, Y. A., & Khamzina, Z. A. (2017). Modernization of Social Security System Legal Regulation in Kazakhstan: Experience and Standards of the OECD Members Implementation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(8), 2498-2503.
Omarova, A. B., Taitorina, B. A., Yermekov, A. T., Doszhanov, B., Buribayev, Y. A., & Khamzina, Z. A. (2017). Application of International Rules Ensuring Social Rights of Families and Children in Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(1), 153-163.
Patrick, R., & Simpson, M. (2020). Conceptualising Dignity in the Context of Social Security: Bottom?Up and Top?Down Perspectives. Social Policy & Administration, 54(3), 475-490.
Raadschelders, J. C. (2008). Understanding Government: Four Intellectual Traditions in the Study of Public Administration. Public Administration, 86(4), 925-949.
Rao, N. (2011). Three Concepts of Dignity in Constitutional Law. Notre Dame Law Review, 86(1), 183-271.
Roth, K. (2004). Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization. Human Rights Quarterly, 26, 63-73.
Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Devereux, S. (2007). Transformative Social Protection: The Currency of Social Justice. In Gabriele Koehler (Ed.), Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest (pp. 64-84). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith-Carrier, T. (2020). Charity Isn’t Just, or Always Charitable: Exploring Charitable and Justice Models of Social Support. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 5(3), 157-163.
United Nations. (2017). Manual on the Measurement of Poverty. New York and Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2018/ECECESSTAT20174_ru.pdf.
Unser, A., Döhnert, S., & Ziebertz, H. G. (2018). Attitudes Towards Refugee Rights in Thirteen Countries. A Multi-level Analysis of the Impact and Interaction of Individual and Socio-cultural Predictors. Political and Judicial Rights through the Prism of Religious Belief, 3, 275. doi: 10.1080/13617672.2016.1188500.
Waldfogel, J. (2004). Welfare Reform and the Child Welfare System. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(10), 919-939.
Waldron, J. (January 2013). Is Dignity the Foundation of Human Rights? NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 12-73. Retrieved from https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/36335655X.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.