Gender Egalitarianism as a Value of International Labor Relations

Authors

  • Zhanna KHAMZINA Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Department of Law, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0913-2002
  • Saulegul YERMUKHAMETOVA Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of Law
  • Kuralay TURLYKHANKYZY Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Department of Law
  • Ainur YESSENGAZIEVA Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of Law
  • Zhambyl ORYNTAYEV M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University
  • Yermek BURIBAYEV Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Department of Law https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0433-596X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.921

Keywords:

international law, human rights, employment standards, gender equality, discrimination

Abstract

Gender philosophy, issues of gender identity and gender inequality are topical issues of the philosophical and legal scientific direction. The manuscript presents an approach that includes understanding gender issues in labor relations from the standpoint of the social state, relations of equality, justice and the common good. Only by gaining a foothold in theory and practice, constantly rising to the level of its philosophical generalization, the ideas of gender equality provide a mechanism for their real implementation, and the gender approach serves to effectively solve problems and preserve social peace. The principle of gender equality acts as a goal that must be taken into account in lawmaking and law enforcement. The purpose of the study is to determine the place and role of international legal instruments in the formation of national methods for ensuring gender equality and processes related to the improvement of mechanisms for protection against discrimination. The study is based on the assumption that international labor agreements have the necessary leverage over national legal systems and that it is in the public interest to effectively implement and enforce them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139979696

Baccini, L., & Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2014). Why do states commit to international labor standards? Interdependent ratification of core ILO conventions, 1948-2009. World Politics, 66(3), 446-490. doi: 10.1017/S0043887114000124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887114000124

Baldez, L. (2011). The UN convention to eliminate all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW): A new way to measure womenís interests. Politics and Gender, 7(3), 419-423. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X11000183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000183

Beitz, C. R. (2013). Human dignity in the theory of human rights: Nothing but a phrase? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 41(3), 259-290. doi:10.1111/papa.12017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12017

Beregovskaya, T., GrishaevA, S., & Smbatyan, S. (2022). Gender and career: Trends in digital society. WISDOM, 2(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v2i1.778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v2i1.778

Boyle, E. H., & Kim, M. (2009). International human rights law, global economic reforms, and child survival and development rights outcomes. Law and Society Review, 43(3), 455-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00379.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00379.x

Buribayev, Y., Khamzina, Z., Belkhozhayeva, D., Meirbekova, G., Kadirkulova, G., & Bogatyreva, L. (2020). Human dignity-the basis of human rights to social protection. WISDOM, 16(3), 143-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.404

Cole, W. M. (2013). Government respect for gendered rights: The effect of the convention on the elimination of discrimination against women on womenís rights outcomes, 1981-2004. International Studies Quarterly, 57(2), 233-249. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12000

Connell, R. (2006). Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 837-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00652.x

Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., & Simmons, B. (2013). Getting to rights: Treaty ratification, constitutional convergence, and human rights practice. Harvard International Law Journal, 54(1), 61-95.

Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2013). Socializing states: Promoting human rights through international law. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199300990.001.0001

Gray, M. M., Kittilson, M. C., & Sandholtz, W. (2006). Women and globalization: A study of 180 countries, 1975-2000. International Organization, 60(2), 293-333. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060176

Hill Jr., D. W. (2010). Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1161-1174. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000599

Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Ronald, I. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550362

Jenkins, T., & Reardon, B. A. (2007). Gender and peace: Towards a gender-inclusive, holistic perspective. In Handbook of peace and conflict studies (pp. 225-247). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203089163-23

Kireyeva, A. A. (2019). Gender pay gap. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://narxoz.edu.kz/research/institutes/gerc/publications

Natsional'nyy doklad ìRynok truda Kazakhstana: razvitiye v novoy real'nostiî (National report ìLabor market of Kazakhstan: Development in a new realityî, in Russian) (2021). Center for the Development of Labor Resources. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/enbek/press/news/details/254450?lang=ru

Nielsen, R. A., & Simmons, B. A. (2015). Rewards for ratification: Payoffs for participating in the international human rights regime? International Studies Quarterly, 59(2), 197-208. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12142

Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Womenís progress and womenís human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 38(3), 589-622. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2016.0043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0043

Prosecutorís Office (2021). Reports on the work of the courts of first instance in civil cases on the information service of the Committee for Legal Statistics and Special Accounting of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://qamqor.gov.kz/portal/page/portal/POPageGroup/Services/Pravstat

Shaffer, G., & Ginsburg, T. (2012). The empirical turn in international legal scholarship. American Journal of International Law, 106(1), 1-46. doi: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.1.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.1.0001

Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811340

Supreme Court (2021). Otchety o rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh del sudami pervoy instantsii (Reports on the consideration of civil cases by the courts of first instance, in Russian). Statisticheskiye dannyye o rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh del Verkhovnym Sudom Respubliki Kazakhstan (Statistical data on the consideration of civil cases by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, in Russian). Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://sud.gov.kz/rus/content/statisticheskie-dannye-o-rassmotrenii-grazhdanskih-del

Tleubayev, A. (2020). Gender (in)equality in Kazakhstan before Covid-19 Pandemic. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://narxoz.edu.kz/research/institutes/gerc/publications

Downloads

Published

2022-12-25

How to Cite

KHAMZINA, Z., YERMUKHAMETOVA, S., TURLYKHANKYZY, K., YESSENGAZIEVA, A., ORYNTAYEV, Z., & BURIBAYEV, Y. (2022). Gender Egalitarianism as a Value of International Labor Relations. WISDOM, 24(4), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.921

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)