Philosophical Discourse for the Development and Improvement of the Intellectualization of Human Nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v20i4.559Keywords:
philosophy, philosophical discourse, human nature, human, intellectualizationAbstract
The principal goal of the study is to characterize the philosophical discourse of the development and improvement of human nature in the context of its intellectualization. The article uses a set of methods that make it possible to reveal a philosophical analysis of the development and improvement of human nature in the context of its intellectualization, in particular: general scientific methods; logical methods of theoret- ical analysis; technical analysis, clarification. Because of the study, the philosophical aspects of the devel- opment and improvement of human nature in the context of its intellectualization were characterized. The needs of the modern economic, political, spiritual development of society require further, deeper research of the actual problems of the doctrine of man. Therefore, interest in man and humanity is becoming espe- cially acute, prompting to justify social and cultural transformations.
Downloads
References
Barkow, Jh., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.) (1995). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beunaflor, L. E. (2006). The meaning of human existence: A historical approach to philosophy of persons. Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp. Publishing Corp.
Castro, F. C. (2005). Philosophy of the human person: A phenomenological approach. Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp. Publishing Corp..
Chibeni, S. S. (2005). Chelovecheskiy analiz nauchnogo realizma (A human analysis of scientific realism, in Russian). In L. Guimaraes (Ed.), Essays on Hume (pp. 89-108). Moscow: Belo Horizonte, Segrac Editora.
Estlund, D. (2011). Human nature and the limits (if any) of political philosophy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39, 207-237.
Hancock, T. (1993). Health, human development and the community ecosystem: Three ecological models. Health Promot Int, 8, 41-46. doi:10.1093/ heapro/8.1.41
Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). Philosophy of right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hull, D. L. (1986). On human nature. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 3-13.
Hume, D. (2002). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, R, & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press
Machery, E. (2008). A plea for human nature. Philosophical Psychology, 21(3), 321-329.
Max-Neef, M. A. (1992). Human scale development: Conception, application and further reflections. London: The Apex Press
McKeon, R. (Ed.) (1966). The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House. The classic collection of Aristotleís key works in English.
Mendoza, C., & Edgar, M. A. (2008). Philosophy of man: Towards perfection. Mandaluyong City: National Book Store, Inc.
Noonan, J. (2003). Critical humanism and the politics of difference. Montreal: McGill-Queenís University Press.
Stevenson, L. (Ed.) (1999). The study of human nature: A reader (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ventegodt, S. (2003). The life mission theory. A theory for a consciousness based medicine. International Journal. Adolescent Medicine Health, 15, 89-91.
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 scientific journal WISDOM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
