Development of English Legal Positivism from Bentham to Salmond and Brown: Leading Ideas in the Context of the Common Law Tradition

Authors

  • Anton MIKHAILOV MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
  • Viktor BESPALKO Russian Customs Academy
  • Anastasia KORZHENYAK MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.669

Keywords:

legal positivism, Anglo-American tradition, command theory, J. Bentham, J. Austin, J. Salmond, W. Brown

Abstract

This article examines the peculiarities of the evolution of English legal positivism, which was the only direction of understanding law formed by professional lawyers, expressing the specifics of their legal consciousness, focused on understanding positive law and the practice of its implementation. The authors examine the key concepts that define the historical trajectory and problem field of legal positivism in the Anglo-American tradition, analyzing the legal teachings of T. Hobbes, D. Hume, J. Bentham, J. Austin, M. Hale, W. Blackstone, J. W. Salmond and W. J. Brown. The attention is drawn to the fact that Salmond lays down objections to the concept of law as a rule of the state and considers its main shortcomings. In his work “Jurisprudence or the Theory of Law”, Salmond presents the flaws and omissions of the “imperative theory of law”, among the proponents of which he names T. Hobbes, S. von Pufendorf, J. Bentham and J. Austin. Brown believes that the essence of law can be expressed by a set of three concepts: “will”, “command” and “reason”, and the just conception of law implies recognition of the elements of unity, growth and growth that is consciously directed towards the realization and achievement of the goal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anton MIKHAILOV , MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

PhD in Law, Associate Professor at the Department of Legal Theory and Com­parative Law of the International Law Faculty of MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. His areas of interest include the methodology of jurisprudence, philosophy of law, topical issues of the general theory of law, comparative law. Mikhailov is the author of over 40 scientific publications on topical issues of the general theory of law, philosophy of law, comparative law. Recent publications: “Juridical Doctrine and Legal Ideology”, “Comparative Law: Romano-Germanic Legal Dogmatics”, “Philosophy of Law: The Idea of Natural Law”.

Viktor BESPALKO, Russian Customs Academy

PhD, Doctor of Science in Law, Professor at the Department of Customs Revenue and Tariff Regulation of the Faculty of Customs Affairs of the Russian Customs Academy, Moscow, Russia. His interests include the history of law, comparative jurisprudence, religious and other social norms. Bespalko is the author of more than 150 scientific publications on topical issues of the theory and history of law, as well as criminal and customs law. Recent publications: “The Role of Customs Autho­ri­ties in Ensuring the Cultural Rights of Citizens”, “Old Testament Roots of Criminal Law in the Pentateuch of Moses”.

Anastasia KORZHENYAK, MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

Researcher at the Department of International Law of the International Law Faculty of MGIMO (University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Her areas of interest include philosophy of law, legal theory, international law, comparative law. Korzhenyak is the author of 25 scientific publications. Recent publications: “Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Law”, “William Jethro Brown’s Critique of John Austin’s Legal Theory as a Stage in the Development of Legal Positivism”, “The Legal Doctrine of John William Salmond as the Evolution of the Anglo-American Legal Positivist Tradition”.

References

Austin, J. (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined. (W. E. Rumble, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bentham, J. (1970). Of laws in general. London: Athlone Press.

Bentham, J. (1977). A comment on the commentaries and a fragment on government. London: Athlone Press.

Bentham, J. (2000). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

Blackstone, W. (1869). Commentaries on the law of England. (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bogdanovskaya, I. Yu. (1993). Pretsedentnoe pravo (Case law, in Russian). Moscow: Science. RAS. Institute of State and Law.

Brown, W. J. (1906). The Austinian theory of law being an edition of lectures I, V, and VI of Austinís ´Jurisprudenceª and of Austinís ´Essay on the uses of the study of jurisprudenceª with critical notes and excursus. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street.

Didikin, A. B. (2016). Analiticheskaya filosofiya prava: istoki, genezis i struktura (Analytical philosophy of law: Origins, genesis and structure, in Russian). Tomsk: Tomsk State University Press.

Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frame, A. (1995). Salmond. Southern jurist. Wellington, N. Z.: Victoria University Press.

Gryazin, I. N. (1983). Tekst prava (opyt metodologicheskogo analiza konkuriruyushchikh teorii) (Text of law (Experience of methodological analysis of competing theories), in Russian). Tallinn: Eesti Raamat.

Gryazin, I. N. (1988). Analiticheskaya filosofiya prava (Analytic philosophy of law, in Russian). Sovremennaya analiticheskaya filosofiya (The Modern Analytic Philosophy, in Russian), 1, 174-197.

Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hobbes, T. (1996). Hobbes: Leviathan (R. Tuck, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Houlgate, L. D. (2017). Legal positivism. In Philosophy, law and the family (pp. 35-57). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51121-4_3

Hume, D. (1960). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Isaev, M. M., & Lunts, L. A. (1947). Predislovie (Foreword, in Russian). In Jenks, E. (1947). Angliiskoe pravo (Istochniki prava. Sudoustroistvo. Sudoproizvodstvo. Ugolovnoe pravo. Grazhdanskoe pravo) (English law (Sources of law. Judiciary. Judicial procedure. Criminal law. Civil law), in Russian) (pp. 5-12). (L. A. Lunts, Trans.). Moscow: Legal Publishing House of the Ministry of Justice of the USSR.

Lloyd, D. (1987). The idea of law: A repressive evil or social necessity? London: Penguin Books.

Lobban, M. (2021). John Austin. In T. Spaak & P. Mindus (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to legal positivism (pp. 225-247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108636377.010

Mikhailov, A. M. (2015). Ocherki teorii i istorii angliiskogo prava (Essays on the theory and history of English law, in Russian). Moscow: Yurlitinform.

Postema, G. J. (2011). Analytic jurisprudence established. In A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence (pp. 3-42). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8960-1_1

Postema, G. J. (2019). Bentham and the common law tradition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Postema, G. J. (2021). The British tradition of legal positivism. In T. Spaak & P. Mindus (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to legal positivism (pp. 176-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108636377.008

Salmond, J. W. (1893). The first principles of jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Haynes.

Salmond, J. W. (1902). Jurisprudence or the theory of the law. London: Stevens & Haynes.

Wacks, R. (2014). Philosophy of law. A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

How to Cite

MIKHAILOV , A., BESPALKO, V., & KORZHENYAK, A. (2021). Development of English Legal Positivism from Bentham to Salmond and Brown: Leading Ideas in the Context of the Common Law Tradition. WISDOM, 1(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.669