Language Features in Modern Social and Cultural Space and Personal Dimension

Authors

Elena KRIVOSHEEVA Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0622-3566
Natallia ZHABO Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-5738
Marina AVDONINA Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-5738
Anna BOBUNOVA Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.701

Keywords:

language, society, culture, synergy, postmodernism, cross-cultural communication, way of thinking, spirituality

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the study of language features in modern social and cultural space, identifying the mechanisms of its transformation (methodological aspect), interrelation and reciprocal influence of language and society, language and culture (postmodernism), language and way of thinking, and human spirituality.

The authors have analyzed modern tendencies of language development, the levels of transformation and unification of linguistic variety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batkin, L. (2001). Neuyutnost' kul'tury (Lack of comfort in culture, in Russian). Metropol: Moscow.

Epshtein, M. (2019). Budushchee gumanitarnykh nauk. Tekhnogumanizm, kreatorika, erotologiya, elektronnaya filologiya i drugie nauki XXI veka (The future of humanities. Techno humanism, erotology, electronic philology and other sciences of XXI century, in Russian). Ripol Classic.

Fedorova, L. (2021). Adaptaciya kak simptom. Russkaya klassika na postsovetskom ekrane (Adaptation as a symptom. Russian classics on the post-Soviet screen, in Russian). Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoye obozrenie.

Gumpertz, G. (1975). Tipy yazykovykh obshchestv (Types of language societies, in Russian). Novoe v lingvistike. Sociolingvistika (New in Linguistics. Sociolinguistics, in Russian), 7, 182-198.

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Ilyin, I. P. (1996). Postmodernism (Postmodernism, in Russian). In Sovremennoe zarubezhnoe literaturovedenie: Strany Zapadnoj Evropy i SSHA: Koncepcii. Shkoly. Terminy (Modern foreign literature studies: Countries of Western Europe and USA: Concepts. Schools. Terms, in Russian (pp. 269-270). Moscow: Intrada.

Jelinek, E. (1975). Die Liebhaberinnen (Women as lovers, in German). Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, Germany.

Kecskes, I. (2004). Lexical merging, conceptual blending and cultural crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2004.005

Keen, K. (1992). Competence: What is it and how can it be developed? In J. Lowyck, P. de Potter, & J. Elen (Eds.), Instructional design: Implementation issues (pp. 111-122). Brussels: IBM Education Center.

Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). The University of Chicago, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001

Kuritsyn, V. P. (2000). Russkij literaturnyj postmodernism (Russian literature postmodernism, in Russian). Moscow: OGI.

Lapin, N. I., &Tosunyan, G. A. (2011). Obzornyj doklad o modernizacii v mire i Kitae (2001-2010) (The review report on modernization in the world and China (2001-2010), in Russian). Moscow: Ves Mir.

Levi-Strauss, K. (1985). Strukturnaya antropologiya (Structural anthropology, in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.

Lotman, Yu. M., & Uspensky, B. A. (1977). Rol' dual'nykh modelej v dinamike russkoj kul'tury (do konca XIX veka) (The role of dual models in dynamics of Russian culture (till the end of the XIX century), in Russian). Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of Tartu State University, in Russian), 414, 3-36.

Mol, A. (1973). Sociodinamika kul'tury (Sociodynamics of culture, in Russian). Moscow: Progress.

Molchanova, G. G. (2006). Sinergiya, kak osnovnoj tipoobrazuyushchij parametr yazykovykh i mezhkul'turnykh innovacij (Synergy as the main type-forming parameter of language and cross-cultural innovations, in Russian). Vestnik MGU Seriya 19 Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikaciya (Bulletin of MSU Series Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Communication, in Russian), 4, 1-21.

Seabrook, J. (2012). Nobrow: Kul'tura marketinga. Marketing kul'tury (Nobrow: The culture of marketing. The marketing of culture, in Russian). Moscow: Marginem Press.

Shapir, M. I. (2000). Universum versus: YAzyk ñ stikh ñ smysl v russkoj poezii XVIII-X vekov (Universum versus: Language ñ poetry ñ meaning in the Russian poetry of XVIII-X centuries, in Russian). In Yazyki russkoj kul'tury (Languages of russian culture, in Russian). (Book 1, VIII). Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture.

Stepin, V. S. (2011). Civilizaciya i kul'tura (Civilization and culture, in Russian). Saint-Petersburg: SpBGUP.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-25

How to Cite

KRIVOSHEEVA, E., ZHABO, N., AVDONINA, M., & BOBUNOVA, A. (2023). Language Features in Modern Social and Cultural Space and Personal Dimension. WISDOM, 25(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.701

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023): 1-2023

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.