Limitations of Classical Logic and Capabilities of Non-Classical Systems from the Point of View of Artificial Intelligence Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v30i2.1116Keywords:
classical and non-classical logic systems, transformational logic, artificial intelligenceAbstract
The article analyzes the differences between classical and non-classical logical concepts. The features and possibilities of transformational logic are considered. Specific details and proposals are analyzed, including using the example of the functioning of ChatGPT, where the use of transformational logic tools, namely rules that clarify the meaning of explicit forms of thought and derive new judgments from explicit forms of thought, as well as complex rules with the help of which it is possible to simultaneously solve the two problems mentioned, would significantly expand the possibilities and improve the operation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
Non-classical logical systems, partly critical of classical logic systems, not only open up new prospects for studying thought structures, but also consider issues that go beyond the subject area of classical logical systems, adding the possibilities of logical science.
In terms of interpreting the phenomenon of complementarity of logical concepts, the conception of polylogic by G. Brutian is valuable and the application of his ideas will give positive results from the point of view of further development of artificial intelligence tools.
Downloads
References
Aristotle (2016). The Organon. Edited by Roger Bishop Jones. https://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/philos/classics/aristotl/obook_draft.pdf
Arnauld, A., & Nikole, P. (1996). Logic or the Art of Thinking. (J. V. Buroker, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Transferred to digital printing 2003). https://homepages.uc.edu/~martinj/History_of_Logic/Port_Royal_Logic/Arnauld%20and%20Nicole%20-%20LAP%20-%20ed.%20Buroker.pdf
Bacon, F. (1620). The New Organon or True Directions Concerning the Interpretation of Nature. https://philo-labo.fr/fichiers/Bacon%20-%20Novum%20organum%20(en%20anglais).pdf
Brutian, G. (1968). On the Conception of Polylogic. Mind, 77(307), 351-359․ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXVII.307.351
Brutian, G. (1983). Transformatsionnaya logika (Transformational Logic, in Russian). Yerevan: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the RA.
Burgess, J. P. (2009). Philosophical Logic. Princeton University Press https://books.google.am/books?id=k32w3_wjBoYC&pg=PA1&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Descartes, R. (1953a). Rules for the Direction of the Mind. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great Books of the Western World (Vol. 31). (E. S. Haldane, & G. R. T. Ross, Trans). The University in Chicago. https://ia801401.us.archive.org/2/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.547481/2015.547481.Rules-for_text.pdf
Descartes, R. (1953b). Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason and Seeking for Truth in the Sciences. . In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great Books of the Western World (Vol. 31). (E. S.Haldane, & G. R. T. Ross, Trans). The University in Chicago. https://ia801401.us.archive.org/2/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.547481/2015.547481.Rules-for_text.pdf
Haak, S. (1974). Deviant Logic: Some Philosophical Issues. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.am/books?id=ANg8AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The sciense of logic. Cambridge Univesity Press. https://www.google.am/books/edition/Georg_Wilhelm_Friedrich_Hegel_The_Scienc/hvFzyR3mNpQC?hl=ru&gbpv=1&dq=hegel+g.+science+of+logic+download+free&printsec=frontcover
Hobbes, T. (1989). Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh (Works in 2 volumes, in Russian). (Vol. 2). Moscow: Publishing House “Mysl’”.
Hovhannisyan, H. O. (2008). Phokhakerpakan tramabanut’yan metodabanakan ev kirarakan tesankyunnery (Methodological and Applied Aspects of Transformational Logic, in Armenien). In Transformational Logic. (Book 2, pp. 617-626). Yerevan: International Academy for Philosphy Press.
Kant, I. (1787). The Critique of Pure Reason. Preface to the Second Edition. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4280/4280-h/4280-h.htm#chap02
Leibniz, G. (1948). The Monadology and other Philosophical Writings. (R. Latta, Trans.). Oxford University Press, London: Geoffrey Cumberledge. https://archive.org/details/monadologyotherp00gott/page/226/mode/2up
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hovhannes Hovhannisyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
