On the Importance of Philosophical Principles to the Social Concept of Global Constitutionalism

Authors

  • Vitaliy GONCHAROV Kuban State Agrarian University Named after I. T. Trubilin
  • Jacek ZALESNY University of Warsaw
  • Sergey BALASHENKO Belarusian State University
  • Grigory VASILEVICH Belarusian State University
  • Artem PUKHOV Belarusian State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.332

Keywords:

global constitutionalism, social concept, development, philosophical principle, ontological, epistemological, axiological, methodological, person, philosophical law

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the role and place that philosophical principles play in the formation and development of the social concept of global constitutionalism.

The objective defined is to analyze the significance of philosophical principles in global constitutionalism as a social concept.

In the research, the author concretized and substantiated the concepts (1) of philosophical principles in social concept, (2) basic philosophical principles of the social concept of global constitutionalism (of development; of cognizability of the world; of the material unity of the world; of the unity of the historical and logical; of ascent from the abstract to the concrete), (3) global constitutionalism as the dominant interpretation of social reality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vitaliy GONCHAROV, Kuban State Agrarian University Named after I. T. Trubilin

(PhD in Law) is Associate Professor of Department of State and International Law, Kuban State Agrarian University Named after I. T. Trubilin, Krasnodar, Russia, member of the editorial board of the journal Culture and Art. His areas of interest include philosophy, theoretical economics, political science, constitutional law. Goncharov is the author of 10 monographs and 180 scientific articles. The list of recent publications involves “View of the Social Concept of Global Constitutionalism on the Legal System”, “Model of the Evolution Social Development in the Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism”, “Global Constitutionalism: Social and Philosophical Analysis”.

Jacek ZALESNY, University of Warsaw

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Law) is Professor at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland, Scientific Secretary of the journal Studia Politologiczne. His areas of interest include philosophy, political science, constitutional law. Zalesny is the author of a large number of monographs and scientific articles. Recent publications: “View of the Social Concept of Global Constitutionalism on the Legal System”, “Model of the Evolution Social Development in the Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism”, “Parlamentaryzm w świecie współczesnym. Między ideą a rzeczywistością” and “System konstytucyjny Białorusi”.

Sergey BALASHENKO, Belarusian State University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Law) is Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Republic of Belarus. His areas of interest include philosophy, law. Ba­la­shen­ko is the author of a large number of monographs and scientific articles. Recent publications: “Dispute Resolution Mechanism for the Belt and Road”, “Legal Guarantees and Implementation of the Principles of Gender Equality”, “Environmental Law of the European Union. General Part”, “Legal Regulation of the Use of Renewable Energy Sources in the Republic of Belarus”.

Grigory VASILEVICH, Belarusian State University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Law) is Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional Law, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Republic of Belarus. His areas of interest include philosophy, law. Vasilevich is the author of a large number of monographs and scientific articles. Recent publications: “Right. Person. State”, “Current Trends in Combating Corruption in the Republic of Belarus at the Present Stage”, “Ideological Component of the Legal Policy of Belarus”, “Citizens and Civil Society Institutions as Subjects of Anti-Corruption Measures”.

Artem PUKHOV, Belarusian State University

(PhD in Law) is Associate Professor, Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Law. Belarusian State University, Minsk, Republic of Belarus. His areas of interest philosophy, law. Pukhov is the author of a large number of monographs and scientific articles. Recent publications: “Criminal Law Protection of Veterinary and Sanitary Safety”, “Criminal Law Course”.

References

Bashkatova, A. (2011). Globalizm s chelovecheskim licom. “Vashingtonskii consensus” ne vyderzhal ispytaniya ekonomicheskim krizisom (Globalism with a Human Face. “Washington Consensus” Could Not Stand the Test of the Economic Crisis, in Russian). Independent Newspaper. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from: http://www.ng.ru/economics/2011-04-06/1_globalizm.html.

Bibikhin, V. V. (2002). Yazyk filosofii (Language of Philosophy, in Russian). Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture.

Brzezinski, Z. (1998). China is a Regional, Not a World Power. Pro et contra, 1(3), 127-141.

Brzezinski, Z. (2014). Strategicheskii vzglyad: Amerika i global’nyji krizis (Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power, in Russian). Moscow: AST.

Buzgalin, A. V. (2008). Al’terglobalizm: v poiskakh pozitivnoi al’ternativy novoi imperii (Alter-Globalization: In Search of a Positive Alternative to a New Empire, in Russian). Age of Globalization, 1, 120-127.

Chernavsky, M. Yu. (2009). Liberalizm i konservatizm: social’no-filosofskii analiz: dissertaciya doktora filosofskikh nauk (Liberalism and Conservatism: Social and Philosophical Analysis: Thesis of Doctor of Philosophy, in Russian). Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical Univer-sity.

Chernyshkov, D. V. (2012). Globalizaciya kak mifologema obshchestvennogo soznaniya: social’no-filosofskii analiz: dissertaciya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk (Globalization as a Mythologeme of Social Consciousness: Social and Philosophical A-nalysis: Thesis of Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, in Russian). Barnaul: Altai State Technical University.

Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order. New York, London: Seven Stories Press.

Chomsky, N. (2003). Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global. AMERICANEM-PIREPROJECT. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from http://americane-mpireproject.com/chomsky/hegemonynotes.pdf.

Clifford, J. (1996). After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist (The Jerusa-lem-Harvard Lectures). Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Demidenko, V. V. (2015). Ponyatie politicheskikh tekhnologii: sushchnost’, formy i vidy (The Concept of Political Technologies: Essence, Forms and Types, in Russian). Power, 12, 140-142.

Duchrow, U., & Hinkelammert, F. J. (2004). Property for People, Not for Profit: Alternatives to the Global Tyranny of Capital. London: Zed Books.

Glazyev, S. Yu. (2016). Perekhod k novoi ideologii upravleniya global’nym ekonomicheskim razvitiem (Transition to a New Ideology of Management of Global Economic Development, in Russian). Problems of Theory and Practice of Management, 6, 9-16.

Guattari, F., & Deleuze, J. (2009). What is Philosophy? Moscow: Academic Project.

Guryanov, A. S. (2013). Princip voskhozhdeniya ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu kak osnova teoret-icheskogo myshleniya (The Principle of Ascent from the Abstract to the Concrete as the Basis of Theoretical Thinking, in Russian). In the World of Scientific Discoveries, 3-4(39), 264-282.

Hegel, G. V. F. (1997). Nauka logiki (Science of Logic, in Russian). Saint-Petersburg: Science.

Kanke, V. A. (2009). Filosofiya ekonomicheskoi nauki (Philosophy of Economic Science, in Rus-sian). Moscow: INFRA-M.

Kant, I. (1994). Kritika chistogo razuma (Critique of pure reason, in Russian). Moscow: Thought.

Kissinger, H. (2011). On China. New York: Penguin Press.

Kissinger, H. (2012). Predely universalizma. O konservatizme Berka (The Limits of Universalism. On Burke’s conservatism, in Russian). Russia in Global Politics, 4, 32-37.

Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order. New York: Penguin Press.

Kuzub, O. S. (2012). Filosofskij princip kak skhema videniya mira (Philosophical Principle as a Scheme of Vision of the World, in Russian). Proceedings of Young Scientists of the Altai State University, 9, 280-282.

Larrain, J. (1994). Ideology and Cultural Identity: Modernity and the Third World Presence. London: Polity Press.

Lebedev, S. A. (2004). Filosofiya nauki: slovar’ osnovnykh terminov (Philosophy of Science: Dic-tionary of Basic Terms, in Russian). Moscow: Academic Project.

Lenin, V. V. (1953). Tri istochnika i tri komponenta marksizma (mart 1913 g.) (Three Sources and Three Components of Marxism (March 1913), in Russian). Moscow: Book.

Makarychev, A. S. (2008). Bezopasnost’ i vozvrashchenie politicheskogo: kriticheskie debaty v Evrope (Security and the Return of the Political: Critical Debates in Europe, in Russian). Public Index, 4(14), 25-40.

Rosenthal, M. M. (1960). Principy dialekticheskoi logiki (Principles of Dialectical Logic, in Russian). Moscow: Publishing House of Socio-Economic Literature.

Schmitt, K. (2006). Diktatura: ot istokov sovremennoi idei suvereniteta do proletarskoi klassovoi bor’by (Dictatorship: from the Origins of the Modern Idea of Sovereignty to the Proletari-an Class Struggle, in Russian). Saint-Petersburg: Science.

Schultz, E. E. (2014). Technologies of Revolt: “Color” Revolutions and “Arab Spring”. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 19, 46-54.

Schutz, A. (2003). Semanticheskaya struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki fenomenologicheskoi sociologii (Semantic Structure of the Everyday World: Essays on Phenomenological Sociology, in Russian). Moscow: Institute of the Fund “Public Opinion”.

Simons, J. (2010). From Agamben to Zizek: Contemporary Critical Theorists. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Stiglitz, J. (2011). Svobodnoe padenie: Amerika, svobodnye rynki i padenie mirovoi ekonomiki (Free-fall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy, in Russian). Moscow: Eksmo.

Tokareva, S. B. (2011). Metodologiya social’nogo konstruktivizma i social’nyi konstruktivizm kak metodologiya (Methodology of Social Constructivism and Social Constructionism as Methodology, in Russian). Vestnik of Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, 2, 113-118.

Wallerstein, I. (2001). Analiz mirovykh sistem i situacii v sovremennom mire (Analysis of World Sys-tems and the Situation in the Modern World, in Russian). Saint-Petersburg: University Book.

Wallerstein, I. (2019). When Will the End of Bush Come? SCEPSIS. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from: http://scepsis.net/library/id_255.html.

Zalesny, J., & Goncharov, V. (2019). Ontological Core of the Social Concept of Global Constitu-tionalism: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis of Content and Evolution. Future Human Image, 12, 129-142. doi.org/110.29202/fhi/12/12.

Zalesny, J., Goncharov, V., & Savchenko, M. (2019), Model of the Evolution of Social Develop-ment in the Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism. Wisdom, 2(13), 51-61.

Zhilina, A. V. (2009). Ontologicheskaya osnova ideologicheskikh processov razvertyvaniya ob”ektivirovannykh form mirovozzreniya (Ontological Basis of Ideological Processes of Deployment of Objectified Forms of Worldview, in Russian). Vestnik Severo-Vostochny Federal University. K. Ammosova, 2(6), 112-117.

Zizek, S. (2014). Shchekotlivaya tema: otsutstvuyushchii centr politicheskoi ontologii (The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology, in Russian). Moscow: Publishing House “Delo”.

Zolotarev, S. P. (2012). Ideologiya liberalizma kak faktor transformacii rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti: teoriya i praktika: dissertaciya doktora filosofskikh nauk (Ideology of Liberalism as a Factor of Transformation of the Russian Statehood: Theory and Practice: Thesis Doctor of Philosophy, in Russian). Krasnodar: Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.

Zyuganov, G. A. (2002). Globalizaciya i sud’ba chelovechestva (Globalization and the Fate of Man-kind, in Russian). Moscow: Young Guard.

Wisdom

Downloads

Published

2020-12-25

How to Cite

GONCHAROV, V., ZALESNY, J., BALASHENKO, S., VASILEVICH, G., & PUKHOV, A. (2020). On the Importance of Philosophical Principles to the Social Concept of Global Constitutionalism. WISDOM, 16(3), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v16i3.332

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2020): 3-2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 WISDOM

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)