Model Of The Evolution Of Social Development In The Philosophy Of Global Constitutionalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v13i2.277Keywords:
global constitutionalism, model, evolution, universe, philosophy, social concept, features, global goal, organizational nature, political sphereAbstract
This article is devoted to the conceptual analysis of the model of the universe evolution in the philosophy of global constitutionalism.
Purpose of research: to develop and justify the construct of education and development of the surrounding reality (material and non-material world) within the framework of the social concept of global constitutionalism.
Object of research: the phenomenon of globalization of socio-political, state-legal and financial-economic development of national societies and states as an appearance of social reality, highlighted in the social concept of global constitutionalism.
Subject of research: theoretical content and stages of development of the model of the universe evolution in the philosophy of global constitutionalism in relation to its social essence.
Downloads
References
Amin, S. (2007). Virus liberalizma. Permanentnaya vojna i amerikanizaciya mira (The Virus of Liberalism. Permanent War and Americanisation of the World, in Russian). Moscow: Europe.
Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 295-310.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.
Arrighi, G. (2008). Globalizaciya i istoricheskaya makrosociologiya (Globalisation and Historical Macro-Sociology, in Russian). Prognosis 2, 57-72.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalisation: The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, U. (1998). Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (2000). Risk Society: Towards another Modern. Moscow: Progress-Tradition.
Comte, A. (2011a). Overview of Positivism. Moscow: Book House "LIBROKOM".
Comte, A. (2011b). The Spirit of Positive Philosophy: A Word about Positive Thinking. 2nd. ed. Moscow: Book House "LIBROKOM".
Dos Santos, T. (1972). Socialismo o Fascismo. El Nuevo Caracter de la Dependencia y el Dilema Latinoamericano. Santiago de Chile: Prensa Latinoamericana.
Frank, A. G. & Gills, B. K. (1996). The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? London: Routledge.
Fursov, A. I. (2008). Mir, kotoryi my pokidaem, mir, v kotoryi my vstupaem, i mir mezhdu nimi (Kapital(izm) i Modern - skhvatka skeletov nad propast'yu?) (The World we are Leaving, the World we are Entering, and the World between them (Capital (ISM) and Modern - the Battle of Skeletons over the Precipice?, in Russian). In D. A. Andreev & V. B. Prozorov (Eds.), De Futuro, or the Story of the Future (pp. 255-304). Moscow: Political Class.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Ivanov, D. V. (2016). Evolyuciya koncepcij globalizacii (Evolution of the Concepts of Globalisation, in Russian). VALS. Retrieved November 10, 2019 from: http://vals.narod.ru/glob/gl_ivanov1.htm.
Kagan, R. (1996). Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy. CARNEGIEENDOWMENT. Retrieved November 10, 2019 from: https://carnegieendowment. org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=276.
Kristol, I. (1995). Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea. New York: The Free Press. Lash, S., & Urry, J. (2002). Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781446280539.
Næss, A. (1948). Interpretation and Preciseness. II. Mimeographed. Oslo.
Næss, A. (1989). Ecology, Community, and Lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patriarch Kirill. (2016). Vystuplenie Svyateishego Patriarkha Kirilla v Kievo-Pecherskoi Lavre na vstreche s episkopami, dukho-venstvom, monakhami, miryanami, prepodavatelyami i studentami Kievskoi Duhovnoi Akademii (Speech of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill at the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra at the Meeting with Bishops, Clergy, Monks, Laity, Teachers and Students of the Kiev Theological Academy, in Russian). PATRIARCHIA. Retrieved August 10, 2019 from: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/707274.html.
Posadsky, A. (2016). Neoliberalizm i ekologizm. Podrobnye Tezisy (Neoliberalism and Ecologism. Detailed Abstracts, in Rus-sian). The Conciliar Hearings of the World Russian National Cathedral on the Topic “Economy in the Context of Globalisation. National View”. Retrieved November 10, 2019 from: http://www.vrns.ru/analytics/4197/#.V7sxs49OLIU.
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalisation: Time-Space and Homogeneity- Heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robert-son (Eds.), Global Modernities (pp. 25-42). London: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781446250563.n2.
Shashkin, P. A. (2016). Suverennaya demokratiya v konturakh novogo mirovogo poryadka. Khristianskii vzglyad na sovremennye problemy social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya (Sovereign Democracy in the contours of a New World Order. Christian View on Contemporary Problems of Socio-Economic Development, in Russian). PERSPEKTIVY. Retrieved November 10, 2019 from: http://www.perspektivy.info/print.php?ID=35961.
Sklair, L. (1991). Sociology of the Global System. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Therborn, G. (1995). European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies 1945-2000. London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Ursul, A. D., & Ursul, T. A. (2016). Ideya evolyucii i global'nogo evolyucionizma (The Idea of Evolution and Global Evolutionism, in Russian). SOCIONAUKI. Retrieved November 10, 2019 from: http://www.socionauki.ru/news/158140
Vasilyev, B. V. (2005). Filosofiya prava russkogo neoliberalizma konca XIX-nacha-la XX veka (Philosophy of Law of the Russian Neo-Liberalism in the Late XIX - Early XX Century, in Russian). (Doctoral Dissertation, Saint Petersburg).
Wallerstein, I. (2001). Analiz mirovykh sistem i situacii v sovremennom mire (Analysis of World Systems and the Situation in the Modern World, in Russian). Saint-Petersburg: University book. Weber, M. (2006). Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma (Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism, in Russian). Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.