Philosophical and Legal Essence of Control in Terms of Ensuring National Security
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v23i3.832Keywords:
philosophy, control, human rights, philosophy of law, national securityAbstract
The main purpose of the study is to determine the philosophical and legal essence of control in terms of ensuring national security. In modern conditions, the rethinking of the fundamental philosophical and legal approaches to the interaction between the state and the individual, the citizen, and public mechanisms is of particular importance. Outdated ideological stereotypes associated with the dominance of the state and its interests in such interaction still prevail in the public philosophy of legal consciousness, which does not contribute to the modern understanding of the legal forms of state acts as a way to ensure the priority of human rights in the sphere of public power. In this regard, great importance is attached to the substantiation of new philosophical approaches to the assessment and formation of state activity. The most important type of such activity has traditionally been controlling and oversight, especially in the context of national security. As a result of the study, the main aspects of the philosophical and legal essence of control in terms of ensuring national security were identified.
Downloads
References
Barry, B., & Wissenburg, M. (2011). The concept of the state in political philosophy. European Political Science, 10, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.56
Cholbi, M. (2022). Philosophical approaches to work and labor. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Spring 2022 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/work-labor
Collins, S., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2021). We the people: Is the polity the state? Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 7(1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2020.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2020.15
Dearey, P. (2002). Systems thinking: A philosophy of management. Philosophy of Management, 2, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20022316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20022316
Dibben, M., & Sheard, S. (2012). Reason in practice: A unique role for a ‘philosophy of management’. Philosophy of Management, 11, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom201211316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom201211316
Dobrolubova, E. I. (2016). Results and efficiency of state control in labor relations. Statistics and Economics, 6, 49-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2016-6-49-57
Erkal, H., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2021). Twenty years of philosophy of management. How has it shaped the field? Philosophy of Management, 20, 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-021-00185-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-021-00185-x
Erkılıç, T. A. (2021). A study on management philosophy in the context of philosophy and basic concepts of management. OPUS – International Journal of Society Studies, 18(40), 1984-2008. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.886009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.886009
Flanagan, B., & Hannikainen, I. R. (2020). The folk concept of law: Law is intrinsically moral. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2020.1833953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2020.1833953
Kraut, R. (2022). Socrates and the state. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691242927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv25wxcqv
Leshchenko, M. P., Kolomiiets, A. M., Iat-syshyn, A. V., Kovalenko, V. V., Dakal, A. V., & Radchenko, O. O. (2021). Development of informational and research competence of postgraduate and doctoral students in conditions of digital transformation of science and education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012057
Machery, E. (2017). Philosophy within its proper bounds. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807520.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807520.001.0001
Manomano, T., & Mundau, M. (2017). Preserving human dignity: Promises and Pit-falls – a South African perspective. International Social Work, 60(6), 1358-1369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817712567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817712567
Novikov, D. (2016). Cybernetics, control philosophy and control methodology. In Cybernetics. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 47, pp 21-26). Springer: Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27397-6_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27397-6_2
Poel, I. (2020). Three philosophical perspectives on the relation between technology and society and how they affect the current debate about artificial intelligence. Human Affairs, 30(4), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0042
Winston, C. (1993). Economic deregulation: Days of reckoning for microeconomists. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1263-1289.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Roman KOLISNICHENKO, Marat TSUMARIEV, Nadiia MELNYK, Iryna GORBAN, Nadiia MARUSHKO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
