Features of the Socio-Political and Theoretical Foundations of the Philosophical Understanding of Law from the Middle Ages to the Present

Authors

Volodymyr ORTYNSKYI Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9041-6330
Stepan SLYVKA Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1683-4363
Nadiya SCOTNA Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-8926
Oksana LEVYTSKA Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5747-1354
Ivanna SHCHERBAI Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0868-3411

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.488

Keywords:

philosophy, law, philosophical understanding of law, Middle ages, modern times

Abstract

The article aims to study the genesis of the philosophical understanding of the law, from the Middle Ages to modern times. The reason for choosing such a significant period of time is that the purpose of the article is to trace the dynamics of understanding the philosophy of law. The methodological basis of this scientific article was formed by the most important approaches, methods and principles of historical research. A study was carried out on the genesis of philosophical understanding of the law, from the Middle Ages to modern times. The understanding of the philosophy of law in different eras of time was considered. In addition, the understanding of the philosophy of law during the Renaissance was examined in detail. The main ideas of law in the philosophical spins of the thinkers of the Enlightenment are considered. The characteristic features of the modern philosophy of law are determined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr ORTYNSKYI, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Volodymyr ORTYNSKYI (PhD, Dr. of Science in Law) is the Director of the Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education of the Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine. The areas of his scientific interests include philosophy, law, philosophical understanding of the law. Ortynskyi is the author of 100 scientific articles.

Stepan SLYVKA, Lviv Polytechnic National University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Law) is Professor of the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law, Constitutional and International Law at the Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Studies, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine. His areas of interest include philosophy, law, philosophical understanding of the law. Dr Slyvka has the authored 50 scientific articles.

Nadiya SCOTNA, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Philosophy) is Professor at Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ukraine. Her areas of interest include philosophy, law, philosophical understanding of the law. Scotna is the author of 40 scientific articles.

Oksana LEVYTSKA, Lviv Polytechnic National University

(PhD, Dr. of Science in Law) is Professor of the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law, Constitutional and International Law at the Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Studies Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine. Her areas of interest include philosophy, law, philosophical understanding of the law. Levytska is the author of 30 scientific articles.

Ivanna SHCHERBAI, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD student at the Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Studies in Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine. Her areas of interest include philosophy, law, philosophical understanding of the law. Shcherbai is the author of 10 scientific articles.

References

Barac, A. (2015). Human dignity, the constitutional value and the constitutional right. Cambridge: CUP.

Bibikhin, V. V. (2002). Yazyk filosofii (Language of philosophy, in Russian). Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture.

Demidenko, V. V. (2015). Ponyatie politicheskikh tekhnologii: sushchností, formy i vidy (The concept of political technologies: Essence, forms and types, in Russian). Nauchno-politicheskii zhurnal: Vlastí (Scientific-Political Journal: Power, in Russian), 12, 140-142. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/3160

Diev, V. S. (2010). Upravlenie, Philosophiya, Obshestvo (Management. Philosophy. Society, in Russian). Voprosy filosofii, na russkom yazyke (Philosophy Issues, in Russian), 8, 35-41.

Frank, S. L. (1992). Spiritual foundations of society. Moscow: Republic.

Franklin, J. H. (1973). Jean Bodin and the rise of absolutist theory. Cambridge: University Press.

Fuller, L. L. (1956). Human purpose and natural law. The Journal of Philosophy, 53(22), 87-99.

Grotius, H., & Rabbie, E. (1995). Hugo Grotius: Ordinum Hollandiae ac Westfrisiae Pietas (Hugo Grotius: Ranks of the Piety of Holland, and the Westfrisiae, in Latin). New York: Brill.

Hegel, G. (1896). Hegelís philosophy of right. London: G.†Bell.

Hobbes, T. (2006). Thomas Hobbes : Leviathan. Published by Rogers. London: Bloomsbury.

Kant I. (1995). Osnovy metafiziki morali. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma; Metafizika morali. Immanuil Kant; per. s nim (Foundations of the metaphysics of morality. Criticism of practical reason. Metaphysics of morals, in Russian). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Kant, I. (2004). Critique of practical reason. (Th. K. Abbott, Ed.). New York: Dover Publications.

Kirkland, P. E. (2010). Nietzscheís tragic realism. The Review of Politics, 72(1), 55-78.

Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order. New York: Penguin Press.

Martinich, A. P. (2003). Thomas Hobbes. In Dictionary of Literary Biography, Volume 281: British Rhetoricians and Logicians, 1500ñ1660, Second Series (pp. 130-144). Detroit: Gale.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1955) Manifest Kommunisticheskoy partii. Kompozitsii. (Manifesto of the Communist Party. Compositions, in Russian) (2nd ed., Vol. 4). Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature.

McKim, D. K. (2003). The Cambridge companion to Martin Luther. Cambridge companions to religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nersesyants, V. S. (2005). Filosofiya prava (Philosophy of law, in Russian). Moscow: Publishing Law of RF.

Parel, A. (1972). Introduction: Machiavelliís method and his interpreters. In N. Machiavelli & A. Parel (Eds.), The political calculus (pp. 3-32). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/PARIMM

Rawls J. (1999). The law of peoples. With ëThe idea of public reason revisitedí. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rozin V. M. (2003). Genezis prava: metodologicheskiy i kul'turologicheskiy analiz (Genesis of law: Methodological and cultural analysis, in Russian). Moscow: NOTA BENE Media Trade Company.

Schiller, F. (2010). Letters upon the aesthetic education of man. Montana: Kessinger Publishing LLC.

Schopenhauer A. (1999). Sviet jak volia i ?ja?liennie: tvory ? 2 tamach (The world as will and representation: works in 2 volumes, in Ukraine) (Vol. 2). Minsk: OOO ìPotpourriî.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-25

How to Cite

ORTYNSKYI, V., SLYVKA, S., SCOTNA, N., LEVYTSKA, O., & SHCHERBAI, I. (2021). Features of the Socio-Political and Theoretical Foundations of the Philosophical Understanding of Law from the Middle Ages to the Present. WISDOM, 19(3), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.488

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2021): 3-2021

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.