An Аxiomatic System of Philosophical Ontology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v26i2.1029Keywords:
philosophical ontology, axioms and definitions of ontology, aporias of ontology, theorems of axiomatic ontologyAbstract
For the first time in the history of philosophy, this article presents an axiomatic system of philosophical ontology intending to demonstratively solve “eternal” questions related to the most fundamental problems of human cognition of the natural (material) world. The corresponding system of axioms and definitions of philosophical ontology is proposed. Proofs of the first 20 theorems of axiomatic ontology are presented as solutions to traditional and modern aporias (incompatible alternatives) of ontology. Finally, the principles and most general laws of modern physics, including the Microworld and cosmology, are used as an empirical base of the theoretical system of philosophical ontology.
Downloads
References
Ainsworth, Th. (2020). Form vs. matter. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/form-matter/
Bricker, P. (2016). Ontological commitment. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ontological-commitment/
Djidjian, R. (2002). The secret of geniality. Yerevan: Noyan Tapan.
Djidjian, R., & Hovhannisyan, H. (2023). Axiomatic epistemology. WISDOM, 25(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.979
Durrer, R. (2011). What do we know about dark energy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0285
Easwaran, K., Hajek, ¿., Mancosu, –., & Oppy, G (2021, Winter). Infinity. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/infinity/
Hoefer, C., Huggett, N. & Read, J. (2023, Spring). Absolute and relational space and motion: Classical theories. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/spacetime-theories-classical/
Hovhannisyan, H. (2015). Meta-argumentation as an argumentation metatheory. Metaphilosophy, 46(3), 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12143
Hovhannisyan, H., & Djidjian, R. (2017). Building a general theory of meta-argumentation. Metaphilosophy, 48(3), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12242
Huggett, N. (2019). Zenoís paradoxes. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/paradox-zeno/
Maudlin, T. (2012). Philosophy of physics: Space and time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Peebles, P. J. E., & Ratra, B. (2003). The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(2), 559-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559
Tempel, E., Kipper, R., Saar, E., Bussov, M., Hektor, A., & Pelt, J. (2014, December). Galaxy filaments as pearl necklaces. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 572. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424418
Torretti, R. (2000). Space-time models for the world. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, (Part B), 31(2), 171-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(99)00036-2
Krauss, L. M., & Scherrer, R. J. (2008, March 1). The end of cosmology? Scientific American. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-end-of-cosmology/
Aristotle (n.d.). Metaphysics. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.html (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Robert DJIDJIAN, Hasmik HOVHANNISYAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
