Fallacies in Argumentation and Discoveries: Methodological Analysis

Authors

  • Hasmik HOVHANNISYAN Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University
  • Robert DJIDJIAN Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v29i1.1108

Keywords:

Meta-argumentation, fallacies, discoveries, “evident facts”, uncritical assumptions, erroneous preconceptions, “crazy ideas", the First Mover, natural selection, Darwinism, crazy ideas

Abstract

This article discusses and suggests solutions to a number of issues related to the problem of main causes of fallacies arising in the history of scientific discoveries like the role of “evident facts”, uncritical assumptions, erroneous preconceptions and “crazy ideas”. Special attention is given to particular cases of Aristotelian idea of the First Mover, Charles Darwin’s non-Darwinian principles advocated in many occasions on pages of Origin of Species, the mechanical explanation of the physical world by the nineteenth century science. The issue of “crazy ideas” is presented in its relation to the notion of “absurdity”. Authors of the article invite its readers to a well-known  fact of history of science that scientists can suggest incongruous concepts while the scientific community and wide circles of men of learning could accept these absurd concepts as a respectful and true theory for long centuries of whole epochs.

Discussions of the problems and their solutions in this article are undertaken in the light of the concept of meta-argumentation developed by authors of the article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle (1996). Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00262105

Bohr, Niels (1985/1949). The Bohr-Einstein Dialogue. In French, A. P.; Kennedy, P. J. (Еds.), Niels Bohr: A Centenary Volume (pp. 121–140). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Darwin, Ch. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (1st ed.). London: John Murray. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68064

Darwin, Ch. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. (1st ed.). London: John Murray. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12293-000

de Broglie, L. (1973) The beginning of wave mechanics. In Wave mechanics. The first fifty years. London: Butterworths.

Djidjian, R. (2002). The secret of geniality. Yerevan: Noyan Tapan Publishing.

Djidjian, R. (2004). Your way to great discoveries. Yerevan: Yerevan State University Publishing.

Eiseley, L. (1958). Darwin’s Century: Evolution and the Men Who Discovered It. (1st ed). NY: Ancor Books

Heisenberg, W. (1973). Erinnerungen an Niels Bohr aus den Jahren 1922-1927. In W. Heisenberg, Schritte über Grenzen. Munchen.

Hovhannisian, H., & Djidjian, R. (2017). Building the general theory of meta-argumentation. Metaphilosophy, 48(3), 345-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12242

Hovhannisyan, H. (2014). Metaargumentation from the perspective of metaphilosopy. WISDOM, 2(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v2i1.47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i2.47

Hovhannisyan, H. (2015). Meta-argumentation as an argumentation meta-theory. Metaphilosophy, 46(3), 479-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12143

Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A treatise on electricity and magnetism. (2 vols). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Planck, M. (1949). The theory of heat radiation. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/40030.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-25

How to Cite

HOVHANNISYAN, H., & DJIDJIAN, R. (2024). Fallacies in Argumentation and Discoveries: Methodological Analysis. WISDOM, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v29i1.1108

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>