Typical Expression Of Cognitive Dissonance And Consonance In The Course Of Argumentation Among Primary-School Children Playing Chess
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v13i2.281Keywords:
cognitive consonance, cognitive dissonance, psychometric personality tests, personality dimension tests, chess, children, chess teachers, school psychologistsAbstract
The research aims to reveal the typical expressions of cognitive dissonance and consonance among the primary-school children by their argumentations upon their deed. The relevance of the research stems from the applicability of the study of the phenomena of dissonance and consonance, which inherently emerge in the sphere of argumentation among the children who study how to play chess. Cognitive dissonance and consonance in the sphere of argumentation in the course of the game of chess are gradually transforming both into the respective reference points – relevant to the situation given, and into the emotional and behavioural manifestations – either adequately or inadequately expressed and, by the logical and inner conflict, are observed as the result of juxtaposition of the realms of emotions and logic.
The present research evidences that, in the case of similar chess skills, the manifestation of cognitive dissonance, and the own argumentation as well are detectable within the domain of extroversion – emotional instability. Such children, even more than the introverts, need the school psychologist’s support. The cognitive consonance is typical of those of the children involved who are ready to gain new experience and appear to be more positively charged towards their rivals or opponents.
Downloads
References
Carnap, R. (1936). Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3(4), 419-471.
Goldberg, L. (1990). An Alternative «Description of Personality»: The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.
Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1976). Know your Own Personality. Penguin Books.
Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (2000). Kak izmenit’ lichnost’ (How to Change a Personality, in Russian) (A. Belopolski, Trans.). Moscow: OOO “Kogito-Tsentr”.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Karapetyan, V. S. (2012). Self-Development of Transforming Society as a Process of Identification of New Paradigm. News and Views, 4(2-3), 154-158.
Karapetyan, V., Gevorkyan, S., & Petrosyan, R. (2014). Target-Oriented Research of the Strategic Programmes on Chess Activities as Specialised Experimental Platform for Dynamic Development of Public Education. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Chess in Schools” (pp. 41-49). Yerevan, Armenia.
Karapetyan, V. S. (2016). Research as a Deliberate Chess Software Testing Platform for Profession-al Dynamic Development of the Education Sector. Management Studies, USA, 4(4), July–August, 161-167.
Nepryakhin, N. Yu. (2010). Ubezhdai i pobezhdai. Sekrety effektivnoi argumentatsii (Convince and Conquer. Secrets of Effective Reasoning, in Russian). Moscow: Alpina Publisher.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, and providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.